Archive for the ‘Hall of Shame’ Category

Shame on You, FDA: Pyridoxamine and Health Freedom… and Truth!

Sunday, June 14th, 2009

Natural Solutions Foundation
wwwHealthFreedomUSA.org

My nominee for the Hall of Shame: FDA with reference to its banning of Pyridoxamine, a form of Vitamin B-6.

Read on and see if you agree with me.

Big Pharma is part of a mega-cartel that makes its money when you are sick. We might want to call it “Big Sick.” The FDA serves the needs of that super cartel without so much as a second thought; it’s built into the bureaucratic structure. It is an agency that Dr. Ron Paul says engages in “abuses of power.” It is increasingly blatant about it, though, as if there is nothing that can be done to stop it.

Well, there is, but it takes a lot of effort. Push-back works. We’ve proven it!

The FDA has, for a long time, banned truthful claims and information about the health benefits you can expect from foods and nutrients. Nutrient benefits will cut into the drug pushers’ market substantially, after all. Unless you do not know the good things you can expect from those items, leaving you all the more vulnerable to the drug pushers who are permitted to sell their deadly wares to you over the TV, in magazines and through your doctor’s prescription pads.

Remember that the 1994 law which gives us the right to nutrients in whatever dose we want them, the Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act (DSHEA) also gives us the right to truthful information about nutrients, herbs and food components. In clear violation of that law, and the First Amendment of the Constitution, however, the FDA uses a variety of powers, real and assumed, to suppress both science and facts. Take away the information and you effectively kill the alternatives to the deadly drugs the Big Pharma cartel pushes…

To make matters worse, this same gag rule on truthful speech concerning nutrient health benefits has been brought — by the FDA, of course, to Codex Alimentarius (the “world food code”) where it has been globalized through the efforts of the US delegate (previous Hall of Shame “Honoree” Dr. Barbara Schneeman, head of the FDA’s Department of Dietary Supplements, no less!) and approved by the Codex Committee on Food Labeling and then by the Codex Commission.

Codex says that any information offered to consumers about the health benefits of food or food components is illegal because it is advertising as if advertising were banned. The whole thing lacks logic, but has reason: the reason is to kill nutritional medicine in favor of drugs. This process has gone dangerously far in the EU and is advancing through FDA “HARMonization” of US rules with Codex restrictions.

Remember, our video “Nutricide” is called that for two reasons.

First, “Nutricide” means the death of the body of knowledge of the relationship between health and food components

Second, “Nutricide” means the death of a large number of people through the manipulation of the food supply. You can watch this important lecture by going to www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and scrolling down the video section. It is well worth your time.

This effort to kill nutrients is blatant as blatant can be.

How blatant? This blatant. Read the excellent article below which discusses the absurd ban on a form of activated B6, Pyradoxamine, to see just how shameless this organization is. This form of B6 has been available for decades. Then remember that when we, in our numbers, push back against the FDA, experience shows that we deflect their plans. Yes, they come back again, but we do push them away from the brink time and time again. With your magnificent help.

We thank you for your activism. After reading this article, I am sure that you will agree that eternal vigilance is the price of protecting high potency nutrients and information about them, from those who want to take away our right to access natural health options, including foods that heal!

The Natural Solutions Foundation continues to fight for your health. Please “stay tuned” for action items to oppose the evil that FDA’s bureaucrats seek to perpetuate. Remember to open our Health Freedom Action eAlerts when we send them to you! Please give generously so that we can continue that fight, with you by our side.

Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=189) to make your tax deductible recurring donation – large or small. Both help enormously.

Dr. Rima E. Laibow, MD

PS – Our Counsel and Co-Trustee, Ralph Fucetola JD blogged about this sordid story this past January:
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/2009/01/change-fdas-plan-to-destroy-dshea.html

————————————-
Big Pharma and the FDA: Suppress the Science, Ban the Natural Substances, Sell the Drugs!

Michael D. Ostrolenk
Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:31 AM

In 2005, an up-and-coming pharmaceutical company made a big mistake: they invested millions of dollars into developing a drug only to discover that the only active ingredient of the drug, pyridoxamine, was really a common, naturally occurring substance that has been sold for decades at low cost to consumers in the form of a dietary supplement, and has always been available in commonly consumed foods such as chicken and brewer’s yeast.

We’re taught as children that when you make a mistake, you should own up to it and face the consequences. Apparently the pharmaceutical company in question, Biostratum, Inc., has yet to learn that lesson. Instead of owning up to their mistake, Biostratum tried to game the system to their advantage by asking the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to declare supplements containing pyridoxamine “adulterated” and effectively ban anyone but Biostratum from selling pyridoxamine.

Sadly, Biostratum’s desperate ploy to save their investment worked. Earlier this year the FDA agreed to ban companies from selling pyridoxamine as a dietary supplement. They denied the request to declare products containing pyridoxamine “adulterated,” but instead they declared that such products are not dietary supplements at all—claiming they are excluded from the definition of dietary supplements under the “prior market clause” [21 U.S.C. 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)] and so may not be marketed as such.

Please note that nowhere in the FDA’s response letter is anything said about safety concerns. In fact, the FDA’s letter specifically says that “to allow such an article to be marketed as a dietary supplement would not be fair to the pharmaceutical company that brought, or intends to bring, the drug to market.” Fair to the pharmaceutical companies? What about fairness to consumers, some of whom rely on affordable pyridozxamine supplements to provide the levels of vitamin B-6 required for their survival? Is it fair to force those consumers to pay for expensive prescription drugs and doctors’ visits to supply their B-6 needs when they could get the exact same thing for a fraction of the cost in the form of a supplement? Isn’t this why our health care system is so ineffective?

This is hardly the first time the FDA has attacked naturally occurring substances. On October 17, 2005, the FDA banned information about the health benefits of cherries from appearing on websites—scientifically proven benefits, such as tart cherries’ ability to reduce the risk of colon cancer because of the anthocyanins and cyanidin contained in the cherry. Cherries, according to the latest research, help ease the pain of arthritis and gout; reduce risk factors for heart disease and diabetes; help regulate the body’s natural sleep patterns, aid with jet lag, prevent memory loss, and delay the aging process; and helps lower body fat and cholesterol—risk factors associated with heart disease. Moreover, Scientists at Johns Hopkins have found that tart cherry anthocyanins reduced painful inflammation as well as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, indomethacin.

When the 2005 ban was instituted, the FDA sent warning letters to twenty-nine companies that market cherry products. In these letters, they ordered the companies to stop publicizing scientific data about cherries. According to the FDA, when cherry companies disseminate this peer-reviewed scientific information, the cherries become “unapproved new drugs” and are subject to seizure. The FDA warned that if those involved in “cherry trafficking” continue to inform consumers about these scientific studies, criminal prosecutions would ensue.

But fresh fruit and vegetables are not the FDA’s only target: As we reported in this newsletter recently, General Mills was recently issued a warning letter by the FDA for illegally marketing Cheerios Toasted Whole Grain Oat Cereal. The problem was the claim on the cereal box that Cheerios can lower cholesterol 4% in six weeks, and the statement on their website that “diets rich in whole grain foods can reduce the risk of heart disease.” The letter, dated May 5, 2009, called the above claims “serious violations” of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and applicable regulations. FDA stated that based on the claims made, Cheerios is now an unapproved drug, and must go through FDA new drug approval process. Note that the FDA isn’t disputing the claim. It’s disputing the company’s right to make the claim.

As one newspaper columnist humorously put it, “One of these things is not like the others: morphine, penicillin, aspirin, Cheerios. Most drugs, if taken improperly, will kill the consumer or cause substantial bodily harm. An entire bottle of aspirin at one sitting will harm or kill. If Cheerios is a drug, therefore, one should be able to commit suicide by consuming the entire box.”

For years, the FDA barred health claims about the benefits of fish oil for heart, cancer, depression, body pain, and various other conditions until a drug company paid a great deal of money to go through the approval process. This type of enforcement effectively censors scientific information and greatly restricts consumer access to scientific studies that provide valuable information.

In the case of pyridoxamine, the FDA did not act out of concern for public safety. This is about money, and about a profit-seeking corporation taking advantage of what is supposed to be a public health organization in order to save their skins.

http://aahf.nonprofitsoapbox.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=798&Itemid=

No Surprise: Plastics Industry Plans Campaign to Keep You Purchasing Toxic Materials

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

Natural Solutions Foundation
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

The Dangers of Estrogen Mimicking Compounds in Certain Plastics

Bis Phenol A (BPA) is bad for you, especially if you have not been born yet. Moms who are exposed to BPA during their pregnancies (or before it) give birth to male babies whose sex organs and anatomy have been feminized. That is just one of the dangers of xeno-estrogens (which mimic the effect of estrogen on the body) like BPA. There is no known way to reverse these changes.

Breast and prostate cancer, of course, are other known hazards. Why is it permitted in our food chain both by the US and by Codex Alimentarius (the “World Food Code”). Well, as the Narrator says in Cabaret, “Money makes the world go ’round, the world go ’round, the world go ’round!”

Money certainly makes the FDA go ’round and the FDA makes Codex go ’round. But, when you read the notes of the meeting held recently by the industry interests which want to keep BPA going ’round because it brings them SO much money, prepared to be horrified at the way the “real world” works. Watch for their definition of the “Holy Grail” spokesperson on the wonderful benefits [sic!] of BPA and be prepared to change your buying habits to real, whole, uncontaminated foods – exclusively, and water in glass bottles – exclusively.

BPA has long been known to be both dangerous and ubiquitous in prepared foods. Leeching from the lining of cans and plastic bottles, the US Government has chosen not to set upper limits of any kind for it.

Treehugger.com points out:

“17% of the American diet comes out of cans, and many of those have an epoxy liner made with Bisphenol A, a chemical which can mimic human estrogen and which is linked to breast cancer and early puberty in women. While the leaching of BPA from Nalgene water bottles and other polycarbonate bottles is a concern, the danger from canned food may be greater. The Environmental Working Group tested canned food bought across America and found BPA in more than half of them, at levels they call “200 times the government’s traditional safe level of exposure for industrial chemicals.” There are no standards for BPA; it is allowed to be put in anything, and billions of pounds are produced each year.”

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/04/bpa-danger-from-cans.php

The Environmental Working Group found, in a study of canned food,

“Of all foods tested, chicken soup, infant formula, and ravioli had BPA levels of highest concern. Just one to three servings of foods with these concentrations could expose a woman or child to BPA at levels that caused serious adverse effects in animal tests.”

Their results are staggering: 33% of all infant food is seriously contaminated with BPA while 1/10 of all canned food is, too.

Baby Food and Canned Food Highly Contaminated with BPA

While the Chemical Industry, in the guise of the American Chemical Council, continues to opine, in the absence of any meaningful substantiation, “”Human exposure to BPA from can coatings is minimal and poses no known risk to human health.”, the facts are quite different. There are literally hundreds of peer reviewed studies which show the biological and reproductive hazards associated with BPA exposure at low levels.

BPA is an approximately $6 Billion per year business. Recognizing its bad behaviors as an additive or as a substance that the public is ingesting would be very bad for that business, indeed. So recently the main actors in the BPA scenario met together to figure out has to make this problem – the rejection of BPA by the public – go away.

Following, you find the purported notes of that meeting. I say “purported” because I have no certain knowledge that this meeting took place, that these notes were, in fact the output of that meeting or that this document represents a slice of reality. I believe, however, based on the internal consistency and content, that they were taken at that meeting and that the contents of this document bear careful examination. The contents should induce anger and extreme caution in you.

Anger because of the blatant assumption that you are so easily led and mislead and that your well-being is of no consequence in the dollar game (it is not of consequence to anyone in this meeting, apparently) and caution because if you are eating or drinking anything out of plastic or cans, you might want to stop doing so NOW.

I know that General Bert and I have.

The use of the phrase “prolong the life of BPA” in the notes suggests that these people know that the truth about BPA will eventually be recognized and that it will be forced off the market. Very much like the tobacco-death industry during recent decades, these people are willing to endanger public health to extend their profits a few more years. They expect that you will do nothing about their disinformation plans to fool you… but we know the power of pushback. Now that you know, what will you do?

Please remember to make your on-going tax deductible donation to http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=189 to keep health freedom free and keep information coming to you which you need.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
(the website for the Valley of the Moon(TM) Eco Demonstration Project, Volcan Panama)
http://www.Organics4U.org
http://www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv
www.Youtube.com/naturalsolutions

PS: A quick note about baby food: when my son, now 34 years old, was a baby, I took the food that we ate at the table (all of it organic, free of added sugar or salt, artificial colors or flavors, additives and other contaminants, of course) and put it into a “Happy Baby Food Mill” which I carried with us wherever we went.

It was basically a fine grinder, easily cleaned, which put out a puree of whatever I put into it. Voila! Instant fresh baby food at any moment I wanted it. I knew EXACTLY what went into it, whether there were additives (I would have had to have put them there myself if there were any) and my baby was eating fresh, wholesome food exactly as I was. A quick rinse under a water faucet and the mill was ready to slip into a plastic bag until it was needed again on our excursion or until I got it home to a sink of hot soapy water. I see no reason why ANYONE needs commercial baby food, based on my happy experience with the Happy Baby Food Mill!

Did I mention? No BPA’s! REL

These alleged minutes follow an invitation from a major food trade association to its
members requesting their attendance at a communications strategy meeting on
Thursday, May 28, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Obtained by the Environmental Working Group

Meeting Minutes
North American Metal Packaging Alliance, Inc.

May 28, 2009 – 10:00 a.m. – 3:10 p.m. EDT

RE: BPA Joint Trade Association Meeting on Communications Strategy

Meeting Goal: Develop potential communication/media strategies around BPA

Discussion Topics: Consideration of available web-based communication
options, including targeted geographies, as well as mainstream media response

Attending Companies: Coca-Cola, Alcoa, Crown, North American Metal
Packaging Alliance, Inc., Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), American
Chemistry Council, Del Monte

Summary: Attendees discussed the need to be more proactive in
communications to media, legislators, and the general public to protect industries
that use BPA, prolong the life of BPA, put risks from chemicals in proper
prospective, and transcend the media and the blogosphere. Attendees believe a
balance of legislative and grassroots outreach (to young mothers ages 21-35 and
students) is imperative to the stability of their industry; however, the association
members continue to struggle to initiate research and develop a clear-cut plan to
defend their industry. The committee will spend approximately $500,000 to
develop a survey on consumer BPA perceptions and messaging and eventually
content and outreach materials. Overall, the committee seemed disorganized,
and its members frustrated. Lack of direction from the committee and these
associations could continue to allow other associations and environmental
groups to push BPA out.

Other Points: Attendees suggested using fear tactics (e.g. “Do you want to have
access to baby food anymore?”) as well as giving control back to consumers
(e.g. you have a choice between the more expensive product that is frozen or
fresh or foods packaged in cans) as ways to dissuade people from choosing
BPA-free packaging. Attendees noted, in the past, the different associations
have had a reactive strategy with the media, with very limited proactive outreach
in reaching out to journalists. The committee agrees they need to promote new,
relevant content to get the BPA perspective into the media mix. The committee
believes industry studies are tainted from the public perspective.

The committee doubts social media outlets, such as Facebook or Twitter, will
work for positive BPA outreach. The committee wants to focus on quality instead
of quantity in disseminating messages (e.g. a young kid or pregnant mother
providing a positive quote about BPA, a testimonial from an outside expert,
providing positive video, advice from third party experts, and relevant messaging
on the GMA website). Members noted traditional media outreach has become
too expensive (they have already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars) and
the media is starting to ignore their side. The committee doubts obtaining a
scientific spokesperson is attainable. Their “holy grail” spokesperson would be a
“pregnant young mother who would be willing to speak around the country about
the benefits of BPA.”

Eventually, the committee concluded before deciding on the tactics to spread
their messages, they need to develop the messages. The committees plan to
fund a joint survey and message testing—what new messages they need to
sell—before implementing a website and creating materials. Another task group
will be implemented to finalize how to develop messages and aggressively use
electronic media to deliver those messages.

Members noted the industry needs research on how perceptions of BPA are
translating into consumer behavior—Is it translating into most moms not buying
canned products or just a minority of moms? They hope to form messages
relevant to how people live their lives—What does not having BPA mean to your
daily lifestyle? Focusing on the impact of BPA bans on minorities (Hispanic and
African American) and poor is also important. The members want to put the
danger of BPA into perspective.

Legislatively, the committee is focusing on Connecticut and California.
Committee members are meeting with as many representatives on the Health
Committee as possible. The members are focusing on more legislative battles
and befriending people that are able to manipulate the legislative process. They
believe a grassroots and legislative approach is favorable because the legislators
worry about how the moms will react. If the Connecticut bill goes through, the
committee believes it will be a good opportunity to talk about the negative impact
that ban will have on businesses and employment—How will it affect the union
workers? The committee wants to put a proposal together for the right way to
deal with legislative issues in each state.

The committee discussed Prop 65 in California—requiring the Governor to
publish, at least annually, a list of chemicals known to the state to cause cancer
or reproductive toxicity. The committee will form a coalition to write a submission
about the benefits of using BPA by the deadline for submissions on June 30,
2009. Members will also build up their contact base in Sacramento. The
committee does not want to win at the legislative level and then not have anyone
to buy the product.

The committee questioned whether or not trade associations should challenge
what is being said about BPA. Other trade associations for plastics have begun
writing letters in response to “lies” being told about BPA. The committee
proposed to be involved in the dialog and comment electronically and directly
back to reporters. Attendees noted it does not matter what the next material is,
there will be issues with it, and the committee wants to work to make people feel
more comfortable with BPA and “BPA2” or whatever chemical comes next.

The committee suggested dividing the costs of the work and research equally by
the members. The members are guesstimating it will cost at least $200,000 for
the message testing and the survey and $500,000 for the entire project. The
committee is also looking for new members to help with costs and outreach.

— End of Purported Notes —

Letters of Support and Further about the Cyber Attack

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Natural Solutions Foundation
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

UPDATED INFORMATION – May 26, 2009

Link to the Emergency Appeal about the attack against the Foundation: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2726

We continue to receive letters of support and help from the members of the Health Freedom Action eAlert team. Here are two letters and my response, giving more details of the cyber attack and what we are doing to stem it.

Letter of Support
Letter from Cyber Expert
Response from Counsel
Report to US CERT (Computer Emergency Response Team)

——————————————————

From RS to his contact list:

“> I must ask you a favor, if you are willing, as I know you have quite a few
> readers, and we need as many as possible to respond as quickly as possible.
> If you have friends with their own large readership, please immediately tell
> them too. We have next to NO TIME on this one.
>
> I am writing to you because of what I consider to be a national
> emergency that is real, and in fact in my mind it is a global emergency.
> You are on my growing list of heroes, which I started to keep the attention
> on those that are doing so much good, instead of the spotlight always being
> only on the criminals attempting to run the planet and those below them who
> are aspiring to the same, on their own level. Well, there is a great lady
> who is also on my heroes list. Her name is Rima Laibow. She is a medical
> doctor, one of the small minority that is a real doctor not a drug dealer.
> She had a great practice in natural healing that was doing very well, but
> gave it up to pursue, along with her husband (retired General Bert Stubblebine) the
> defeat of CODEX worldwide. This program is one of the deadliest of attacks
> (among many that are proceeding in parallel against us), and Rima’s work
> worldwide is critical to our current and future well being. To our shame,
> her organization is running on a ridiculously small budget, and now that is
> being attacked because of the amazing work she is doing. I am attaching her
> latest email to all those on her list. It needs to go EVERYWHERE, and it
> needs to go everywhere NOW. She only has about 250,000 on her email list,
> and many many more are needed immediately to prevent her work from being
> stopped according to the wishes of our Rulers.
>
> If you are not already familiar with her work, please catch up on it
> right away, few things are more important, more positive, or more
> inspiring. This is really important. As much money as
> possible needs to be pumped into her account NOW and it needs to continue,
> but far too few are aware of her, or aware of the stakes.
>
> Please help. I am copying and pasting her appeal below. If you need
> a nutshell recap of CODEX, call me, I’ll be pleased to fill you in as
> needed. Thank you very much.”

More on Codex Alimentarius (the World Food Code):
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=161

About our accomplishments:
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=195
———————————————————-

And this from a cyber-attack expert:

“> > I work for a company called located in Los Angeles, CA and we have a great
> > deal of experience in fraud, embezzlement, ponzi schemes,
> > etc. I would like to catch the people that have caused you a
> > great deal of harm. My biggest concern is you continuing to use your
> > computer system on a daily basis which makes it a lot harder to track dates
> > and times that emails were sent or payments received or to track when these
> > attacks took place.
> >
> > I would suggest you do a Penetration Test on your system immediately.
> >
> > If you are interested in getting real help with a problem that seems to go
> > on frequently (as I have gathered since reading your emails for the last
> > year) then give me a call. I think it is time to put a stop to this nonsense
> > and make your system stronger and less prone to attacks from outside sources.
> >
> > We charge $325/hour and we can get started right away (as early as next
> > week) to get you on the road to recovery.
> >
> > Please call me and let me know if you would be able to afford our services
> > now or in the near future. I understand that you have lost a lot of money.
> > But you can catch these people and make them pay for their wrongdoing. We
> > are very successful in winning cases.”

——————————————————————————

And here is what I wrote back:

“Thank you for your concern. We are considering all of our options. Your
advice, based on the below, would be appreciated.

Please understand that in the fine print of the authorize.net contract is
language that the company interprets to allow them to charge us for attempts
to “donate” to us even when those attempts are fraudulent. We paid extra for
their fraud protection, but they still wanted to charge us for the cyber
attack.

We asked them to “donate” their charges to us, so they would have a tax
write-off instead and we could tell the world what a public-spirited company
they were. Instead, we got stonewalled and they back-charged our account for
their claimed fees.

The criminal behavior was whoever placed those about one hundred thousand fake
“donations” — authorize.net was just acting as a bad corporate citizen, not
as a criminal. However, their inability to protect us from the attack is
something anyone should consider who might want to use their services.

We told authorize.net about the attack (you would have thought they would have
noticed a hundred thousand transaction attempts…)

Here is what our investigation has shown so far:

1. They allowed huge numbers of fraudulent or suspicious charges through
despite clear indications that they were “bot” activity.

2. They permitted the charges to continue after we notified them.

3. They sold us a “Fraud Detection Suite” which did not detect the obvious
fraud.

4. They continued to allow the charges despite the fact that they had been
notified.

5. They took money from our bank account without notification.

6. They continue to send us settlement statements despite the fact that we
have officially closed the account BUT it is no longer possible to access our
data.

7. Legitimate charges were blocked while over 100,000 suspicious ones were
allowed through.

8. We received no notification of any problem from them – even after we
notified them of the fact that there was a problem, they took no apparent
action.

What authorize.net did drained our account of the funds we needed to catch-up
with Democracy in Action (DiA) – the platform we use for our eblasts. All the
nonprofits are hurting right now and DiA’s members (of which we are one of
several hundred) have all fallen behind, so the people who run that
organization felt they had to get tougher with its members, us included.

The two problems hit at the same time, leaving us at risk of being shut down.

We can recover from the attack. We will not be shut down.

The people on the Health Freedom Action eAlert list have responded with great
generosity, so much so that we can cover the funds taken by authorize.net,
catch up with DiA and Bert and Rima will be able to attend the next Codex
meeting!

We are in deep gratitude for the extraordinary response to the emergency appeal.

Ralph Fucetola JD, Trustee”

And we do need all the support we can get.

Please donate here:

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=189

—————————————————–

Report to US Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT)

May 26, 2009

Form at: https://forms.us-cert.gov/report/ – Report No. 2009-USCERTv31SJFG6
Phone: +1 888-282-0870 – Email: soc@us-cert.gov – Web: http://www.us-cert.gov/
From: Ralph Fucetola – ralph.fucetola@usa.net

Are you reporting as part of an Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC)?

No, this is not an ISAC report

What type of organization is reporting this incident?

Private Sector

What is the impact to the reporting organization?

High

What type of follow-up action are you requesting at this time?

Contact

Describe the current status or resolution of this incident.

Contained

From what time zone are you making this report?

(GMT-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

What is the approx time the incident started? (local time)

May 20, 2009 17:57

When was this incident detected? (local time)

May 24, 2009 17:57

Please provide a short description of the incident and impact

Natural Solutions Foundation is a recognized nongovernmental organization in the US and several other countries. Over a several day period some persons unknown to us attempted to \”donate\” $1.00 over 100,000 times. Our merchant banker, authorize.net, charged us for each item in this fraudulent cyber attack — they had no incentive to stop it since they profited from it. Even their \”Fraud Detection Suite\” for which we paid extra did nothing to stop it. Finally we had to cancel the account. We wonder how many other NGOs and companies have been victims of similar cyber attacks not stopped by authorize.net? We believe this cost us over $8,000 in fees. We\’ve posted information about this on our blog:

Letters of Support and Further about the Cyber Attack

Ralph Fucetola JD Natural Solutions Foundation Trustee All rights reserved.

A Message of Hope from Dr. Laibow: Reclaiming Food & Farming Freedom

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

Natural Solutions Foundation
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

The following is an email written by Dr. Laibow to a leading advocate of sustainable farming. It is a request for an endorsement of part of our International Decade of Nutrition, namely our Green Eco Demonstration Project in Panama, the Valley of the Moon™ – see: www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org. We are publishing this email as it is a comprehensive review of what we seek to do, and specifically regarding our application with the semi-official Panamanian foundation, Ciudad Sabor (City of Knowledge). We need letters of endorsement for the Project from ‘persons of international status’ and if you or someone you know can provide us with such letters, please contact me at ralph.fucetola@usa.net. For the residential aspect of the Project, please see: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2476

Ralph Fucetola JD
Foundation Trustee

———————————

I am writing to ask a favor of you which I hope you will grant and which will lead, I believe, to a new and strong position for our shared passion to keep clean food – and freedom – ubiquitously available to everyone on the planet.

As the Medical Director of the Natural Solutions Foundation, www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org , I would like to introduce our Foundation, then myself, and the Valley of the Moon™ Eco Demonstration Project, www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org , a Seed Community and Teaching Project that we are creating in the Highlands of Panama for the purpose of helping to spread the techniques and technologies necessary to reclaim food production from the industrial forces which are attempting to hijack it on a global basis.

First, the Natural Solutions Foundation is a private NGO with no corporate or government ties of any kind. We are a tax exempt humanitarian charity registered in the United States, active on a world-wide basis and registered as a Private Interest Foundation in Panama. Our compass is the entire range of health freedom rights including –

* Open access to clean, unadulterated food;

* Food sovereignty for every human being on the planet, unrestricted by government or corporate intervention;

* Unfettered access to information about the relationship of food and health (currently restricted under both US regulation and Codex Alimentarius standards and guidelines;

* Open access to natural health options and products (currently under severe attack by bodies such as the EU, governments like the US and Australia and organizations like Codex Alimentarius);

* Self-determination about procedures and treatments such as vaccination, compulsory “screening” and coerced drugging, etc;

* Open access to natural health treatment options for health maintenance as well as disease treatment, prevention and cure;

* Total medical privacy without any government or corporate intrusion into the relationship between health care provider and patient;

* Total banning of products, “food” and ingredients from biotechnology;

* Creation of a Pro Health alliance of countries willing and able to abandon the dangerous (and potentially lethal) standards and guidelines of the Codex Alimentarius Commission by following the legal process we have identified which will protect them from WTO trade sanctions (“The Codex Two Step Process”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QNg3MD6BxM&). We have traveled to numerous potential members of this alliance including India where we had the opportunity to meet with President Dr. Abdul Kalam in a private briefing on this topic;

* Attending Codex meetings for the purpose of supporting that pro-health alliance, providing scientific data on pro-health positions and briefing delegates, Ministers of Health and Agriculture and others on the implications of positions intended for ratification (driven, of course, by the US and its Multinational Corporate directors who literally sit on the US delegation).

In analyzing the strategic point of greatest global and local impact, we came to the conclusion that nothing would have more global impact on the widest possible number of factors than reclaiming the production of food by wresting it from corporate/statist control and returning it to the hands of farmers and non-farmers alike. To do this, we initiated the Natural Solutions Foundation’s International Decade of Nutrition (September 2005) and created a series of programs like our Agricultural Programs in Benin, Africa where we installed clean, safe, chemical free, inexpensive and intuitive technology designed to increase crop production by 200-600%, increase nutrient density by the same amount, decrease water usage by up to 25% and increase storage life by a similar amount.

After a global search, we decided to create the first of our teaching communities in the Chiriqui Highlands of Panama and created the Valley of the Moon™ Eco Demonstration Community, www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org.

Our first project was to purchase an coffee farm which was heavily infested with the devastating fungus Mycena citricolor (locally known as “ojo de gallo” or “rooster’s eye”) and create a foliar spray using bacteria and nutrients to cure the disease. This was so successful that the Natural Solutions Foundation intends to build a small factor, teach local farmers how to use this product and, in so doing, replace the toxic fungicides which perviously have been the coffee farmer’s only tool against this enormously costly problem.

Our following projects include –

* A BeyondOrganic BioDynamic Zero Emissions Farm and Farm School in the remote and beautiful town of Portrerillos Arriba. Since Panama holds most of the growing climates in which food is produced by most of the world’s farmers, segments of the school will be created on pieces of land at different altitudes and conditions to allow farmers from around the world to participate in this education for sustainable, net energy-producing farming techniques. We will be following the procedures elaborated by Fr. Godfrey Nzamajo Songhai Foundation’s Zero Emissions Research Initiative (Benin).

* Intensive Urban Agriculture, similar to “Square Foot Gardening” will be taught to children, mothers and others to disseminate the techniques of growing clean, unadulterated food on a family-by-family basis using, and saving, heirloom organic seeds and providing the nutritional components necessary to reverse the deadly trends of demineralized and devitalized, GMO and contaminated food.

* A Natural Health Center where natural medicine, including traditional herbal strategies for health, acupuncture, acupressure, homeopathy, detoxification, neurobiofeedback, massage and a host of other natural medical strategies will be taught and employed.

* A medical service for local and indigenous people will be created so that economic and sociological conditions are no bar to access to these medical options.

* A seminar center will be available to allow people to come to the Valley of the Moon for intensive educational opportunities in both long and short courses.

* A small hotel for guests and tourists.

* A cutlural center for performing and teaching music, dance, the plastic and visual arts.

* A residential area for long-term participants.

By using Zero Emissions Farming, no pollution will be produced and our only outputs will be 1.) energy from methane gas and 2.) energy from clean, unadulterated food.

Valley of the Moon™ Eco Demonstration Village is applying for affiliation with the unique Panamanian semi-private Foundation know as the City of Knowledge, http://www.ciudaddelsaber.org/, which provides interlinking relationships between organizations and programs bringing best practices, including sustainable agriculture, to Panama.

We believe that we could create our program, designed for international application, more efficiently and effectively with City of Knowledge affiliation than without it it.

One of the things City of Knowledge seeks is the endorsement, support or approval of persons with “International Presence”. You are certainly such a person and your work in sustainability and GMO free agriculture is of enormous importance and has been an inspiration to the Natural Solutions Foundation and to me personally.

I would be very grateful if you would consider writing a letter in support of our efforts for health freedom. I will be happy to supply any information or particulars to assist you in that effort.

If you would like more information, or personal contact for an in depth discussion about our organization and efforts, I would be pleased to meet with you electronically at your leisure.

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. I remain,
Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Eater’s Guide to Produce Contamination and the Law

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

Natural Solutions Foundation
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.NaturalSolutionsEurope.org

Once again, the Natural Solutions Foundation wants to thank the Environmental Working Group for their outstanding work. For 5 years the EWG has published a list of the safest, and most dangerous, types of produce, focusing on pesticide levels.

Here is this year’s list. Numbers in front of the item indicate how bad it is (higher is worse), numbers after the item indicate its pesticide load. So eat from the bottom of the list if you are not buying organic. If you are eating organic, you can enjoy the whole bounty of spring’s harvest.

But think for a moment, before you begin to plan your shopping this season, what it means to have foods like peaches, apples and sweet peppers so contaminated that eating them is, quite literally, taking your life onto your fork and into your hands.

That is what the industrialized food producers have done so far: introduced, with the blessings of our weak and dangerous government regulators who allegedly are keeping our food safe, chemicals and genetic alterations, irradiation and other degredations which have made our food not only unwholesome, but downright dangerous.

But WAIT!! There’s more. HR 875, S 425 and the associated bills working their way rapidly through our clueless (or worse!!!) Congress are fixing to make the current level of contamination look like Grandma’s home grown goodies. Click here to tell Congress in no uncertain terms that this set of bills must not pass and, if pass, MUST be ammended to protect home and organic food production, growing and farming.

HR 875 and S 425 (and their associated bills) provide for a level of industrial control of our food supply that will, not might, may, could or can, but WILL guarantee that you and your family WILL get sick from even more poisoned food. Maybe not this week, maybe not until a few years down the road, but nutritional under supply (from foods grown in soil fertilized with synthetic fertilizers and depleted from de mineralization never really corrected) and toxic overload WILL weaken your immune system, divert you from your life pursuits with chronic and often lethal illness. Freedom? You’ll be too sick to care.

Your food WILL be genetically modified. GMO crops require 4 times more pesticide than conventional ones and a great many of them require huge amounts of herbicides (like glyphosate or Roundup(C), a wildly dangerous chemical which is associated with cancer, infertility, auto immune diseases and more.

Roundup(C) is, of course, just one of a wide variety of horrifically toxic chemicals whose regulation these new laws put into the hands of unelected bureaucrats whose discretion is breathtaking. Their interest is not in food safety. Their interest is in serving the needs of their corporate masters, and their corporate masters’ masters.

If that does not ring right with you, take a look at the lethal mess our food supply is in today. And then consider that it is the US FDA and USDA, again serving their corporate masters, who run the show at Codex Alimentarius, bringing us horrific standards and guidelines which have the potential to degrade the health, and shorten the life, of every man, woman and child on the planet who eats food grown inside the corporate corral. Of course, for you and me, NOT doing so will be a crime. Saving seeds will be a crime. Growing pristine organic food (or better) will, if the laws currently under consideration are implemented, quickly become a criminal act. The SWAT teams who raided the Ohio family organic cooperative a couple of months ago, the raw milk farmer in Pennsylvania who was taken to jail for selling his clean product and a host of other food atrocities will look, I am afraid, like the “Good Old Days” should these laws reach their logical – and lethal – consequences.

Remember, the law is one thing. Contaminated food is quite another.

Government regulatory agencies regulate for the sake of corporate interests. Yours are nowhere to be seen, unless, of course, you are Monsanto. In fact, the Representative who introduced HR 875 is married, as was a previous, and deeply destructive long-time US Codex delegate, to a Monsanto lawyer. No accident.

The proposed new food agency and the new food powers (under these laws) are nothing short of cataclysmic and over the line insane from a health perspective. The Natural Solutions Foundation proposes removing ALL food regulatory power from the federal government which has, for about 80 years now, proven itself to be increasingly unable to push back the demands of industry, whether Big Pharma, Big Agribiz or Big Chema (or Big Medica, for that matter) weighed against the public good. Deadly drugs, deadly food, deadly environmental contamination and an unrelenting, accelerating assault on health aids like supplements and Nano silver are the result.

Click the link below to tell Congress that, while you want the FDA, USDA, EPA and other inept and dangerous government agencies stripped of their food regulatory powers and those powers returned to newly constructed agencies at the State level controlled by consumers, statutorily devoid of corporate impact or connection, with harsh penalties for any breech of the perimeter keeping industry out of food regulation, we oppose the pending bills, HR875 and S425 which do not contain language to protect family farms and ranches; organic and natural products.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26714

More about this at: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2287

When an agency or program has failed, the typical political situation is to throw money at it to “reform it”, making it bigger, giving it more powers and then watch it fail worse – followed by more money and more power.

This is precisely what has happened with the latest FDA modernization and revitalization bills. More money, more power, more curruption, less safety of either food or drugs.

Drugs you can avoid voluntarily. Food you cannot.

The Natural Solutions Foundation has been warning for several years that home grown and produced food, and organic food, would be coming under sustained and terminal attack. Unfortunately, we were right and that attack is being mounted now. Therefore, the counter thrust must be mounted now, and it must be swift, effective and decisive.

Food MUST be taken out of the hands of the corrupt federal agencies and given back to the people. And saved seed, a corner stone of liberty, along with clean, unadulterated food, MUST not be taken out of your hands and mine.

If you love fascism, sit back and do nothing. If you want to see farmers forced to leave their land and their livlihoods, unable to produce clean food for you, sit back and do nothing. If you want to be forbidden to grow, can, preserver or share your own good food in the US of farmland from sea to shining sea, sit back and do nothing.

If you want the laws of the US “HARMonized” with the draconian food laws of Europe, where a cucumber cannot be sold unless its curvature is correct and where the hundreds of seed companies that once flourished have been reduced to a rapidly dwindling handful, please, sit back and do nothing.

But if you, like me, are aghast at these options, then stand up and be counted. Start disseminating and rousing support for the following action items as if your very life (and that of your children and grandchildren) deepened upon it. Your life and their does depend upon it.

Click below to read a detailed analysis of HR 875 and S 425 and their frighteningly (and absurdly) vague permissiveness giving industry full reign over your food and therefore, your health.

Alarm Bells Ringing in Europe and the UShttp://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2349

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org

The Full List: 47 Fruits & Veggies
RANK Lower numbers are worse
SCORE Higher numbers are worse

1 (worst) Peach 100 (highest pesticide load)
2 Apple 93
3 Sweet Bell Pepper 83
4 Celery 82
5 Nectarine 81
6 Strawberries 80
7 Cherries 73
8 Kale 69
9 Lettuce 67
10 Grapes – Imported 66
11 Carrot 63
12 Pear 63
13 Collard Greens 60
14 Spinach 58
15 Potato 56
16 Green Beans 53
17 Summer Squash 53
18 Pepper 51
19 Cucumber 50
20 Raspberries 46
21 Grapes – Domestic 44
22 Plum 44
23 Orange 44
24 Cauliflower 39
25 Tangerine 37
26 Mushrooms 36
27 Banana 34
28 Winter Squash 34
29 Cantaloupe 33
30 Cranberries 33
31 Honeydew Melon 30
32 Grapefruit 29
33 Sweet Potato 29
34 Tomato 29
35 Broccoli 28
36 Watermelon 26
37 Papaya 20
38 Eggplant 20
39 Cabbage 17
40 Kiwi 13
41 Sweet Peas – Frozen 10
42 Asparagus 10
43 Mango 9
44 Pineapple 7
45 Sweet Corn – Frozen 2
46 Avocado 1
47 (best) Onion 1 (lowest pesticide load)