This important peer reviewed article says what we all know: exposure to environmental toxins, especially during life in the womb, drives the development of later disease through impact on the genes. Consider, then, those most concentrated of toxins found in vaccines given to pregnant women. REL
Developmental reprogramming of cancer susceptibilityAbstract Excerpt: “Gene–environment interactions have been traditionally understood to promote the acquisition of mutations that drive multistage carcinogenesis, and, in the case of inherited defects in tumor suppressor genes, additional mutations are required for cancer development. However, the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHAD) hypothesis provides an alternative model whereby environmental exposures during development increase susceptibility to cancer in adulthood, not by inducing genetic mutations, but by reprogramming the epigenome. We hypothesize that this epigenetic reprogramming functions as a new type of gene–environment interaction by which environmental exposures target the epigenome to increase cancer susceptibility.”
http://www.nature.com/nrc/journal/v12/n7/abs/nrc3220.html
Cheryl Lyn Walker1 & Shuk-mei Ho
How do we all know it? because there is no mother on the planet who does not know in her bones that healthy food while she is pregnant and nursing will help her baby to thrive.
There is no pregnant woman who does not find herself avoiding noxious odors (even if they did not bother her at all before her pregnancy!)
There is no concerned parent or husband or partner who does not seek out clean options for air, food, water and environment when a child is being formed and birthed.
Tragically, many mothers, father, parents, sisters and brothers do not have the option to avoid chemical and radiological contamination.
Years, and scientific epochs ago, the one gene, one effect dogma held sway and none dared question it lest they be fools or worse, not get grants.
But dogma decays, as it should, and we now understand that genes are fluid actors, impacted by what neighborhood they reside in, what is in the brine they soak in and what expectations the receptors at the cell boundaries are programed by. So chemical exposure, we now begin to understand, changes genetic expression, capability and adaptability. Each changed gene, of course, changes the function of its neighbors.
You have only to think about the impact of foreign, alien, DNA introduced into our bacteria and our cells through the consumption of GMO “PHUDE” to imagine the chaos wrought in the genetic material of every cell through that hideous technology.
But even without invoking the astounding, unstudied and uncontrolled dangers of GMOs in our world, chemical contamination during the susceptible developmental periods of growth has the potential for life long damage, even creating lethal changes in genes.
If vaccines were helpful (which they are not), fought disease (which they do not), protected populations (which they do not) or had any other advantage (which they do not), there would be excellent reason in this article and the rest of the large body of literature which shows the flexibility of genetic expression in the face of toxic inputs to never, never vaccinate pregnant or nursing woman.
Never.
That is what this article, and all of the others like it, makes abundantly clear.
Yet, in our mad rush to damage and destroy immunological competence for immediate profit (the vaccine profitability picture) and the after market (cancer, diabetes, immune and auto immune disorders, sterility, infertility, etc., etc.) profits, we target pregnant and nursing women with an exuberance of pseudo-scientific absurdity.
Enough.
No more.
Protect women, children and their fragile immune systems.
Oh, and for the sake of equal protection under the law, how about protecting men, children and adolescents, as well as the elderly.
Works for me. I hope it works for you, too!
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
The General Bert MultiSensor™
