Archive for November, 2008

Divesting the FDA of Food Authority

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

From the Vitamin Lawyer Health Freedom Blog
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/2008/11/divesting-fda-of-food-authority.html

Updated Action eAlert posting: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=1601

Action Item: Divesting the FDA:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26314

Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Divesting the FDA of Food Authority

It’s been a year since an official government study of the FDA said:

1) The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak.
2) The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific workforce does not have sufficient capacity and capability.
3) The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its information technology (IT) infrastructure is inadequate.
4) FDA does not have the capacity to ensure the safety of food for the nation.
5) The development of medical products based on “new science” cannot be adequately regulated by the FDA.
6) There is insufficient capacity in modeling risk assessment and analysis.
7) The FDA science agenda lacks a coherent structure and vision, as well as effective coordination and prioritization.
8) The FDA has substantial recruitment and retention challenges.
9) The FDA has an inadequate and ineffective program for scientist performance.
10) The FDA has not taken sufficient advantage of external and internal collaborations.
11) The FDA lacks the information science capability and information infrastructure to fulfill is regulatory mandate.
12) The FDA cannot provide the information infrastructure support to regulate products based on new science.

From: the November 2007 Report of the Subcommittee on Science and Technology, “FDA Science and Mission at Risk.”

The FDA is a failed agency that, in Dr. Ron Paul’s words engages in “abuse of power.”

Even the FDA’s own scientists are complaining about the corruption that pervades the agency: http://www.naturalnews.com/z024910.html

I believe that due to its focus on the drug industry (80% of its funding comes from Big Pharma “user fees”) and its failure to protect the safety of the food supply, while engaging in international “HARMonization” that degrades organic standards and allows ever-increasing levels of toxins (including antibiotic residues) in the food supply, the FDA is incapable of administering food regulations.

The FDA’s prejudice against nutrient supplementation and traditional, natural remedies means these advanced healthcare alternative competitors to pharmaceuticals are denigrated, marginalized and regulated against.

See also the Natural Solutions Foundations recent comments to the FDA condemning the agency’s latest moves against nutrients: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=1449

What is the answer? It is to, in the immortal words of John Galt, “Get out of the way.” We need to engage market forces to stimulate advanced alternatives to a medical system that is now the major source of death in our society. We need to divest the FDA of any authority over foods. Maybe then it can focus on the dangers of pharmaceuticals, including the uninsurable risks of vaccinations.

We need to free Foods (including nutrients and natural remedies) from the deadly hands of the FDA.

US Vaccine Compensation Court a Failure?

Monday, November 24th, 2008

Barbara Loe Fisher is a strong and consistent voice in the vaccine debate: protect children, give parents the deciding vote on whether their children are vaccinated and tell the public the truth about vaccines and vaccine injury.

She writes well and compellingly about the many intertwined issues involved in vaccination and vaccination compulsion. The article that follows is an excellent review of the reasons that the US special Vaccine Injury Compensation program may now be considered a failure.

Vaccines are increasingly becoming mandatory for workers, students, children attending camp, home schooled children, college students, and more and more groups as well. The constitutional dangers and the physical dangers are enormous.

The Natural Solutions Foundation’s No-Forced-Vaccine Yahoo! Forum is a vigorous community of active and informed people sharing information and strategies for local and larger focus action.
Please visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/no-forced-vaccination/join to become a member of this active and informative group. And, remembering that compulsory vaccination as a public mandate is looming on the horizon, according to both the Health and Human Services and Homeland Security Departments, for every man, woman and child in the US — starting with those who want it (July 23 and 24, 2008, respectively), I urge you to take a moment to take the following actions:
1. Download a copy of the highly informative Vaccine Exemption Handbook, http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=699
2. Sign the Tiburon Declaration, http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=460, to join other health freedom advocates in making your opposition to forced vaccination and drugging clear
3. Forward this email to others on your list, tell them that this issue needs to concern them, too, and ask them to take the actions above and
4. Join the Distribution List for the Natural Solutions Foundation’s safe, secure and private Health Freedom eAlerts, http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=187.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv

DONATE NOW http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189 All deductions are tax deductible if you pay taxes in the US.

For donations in multiples of $25, we’ll say “Thanks” with a 1/2 lb bag of our full bodied Valley of the Moon(TM) Coffee: Shade Grown, GMO and Chemical Free Coffee from the Chiriqui Highlands of Panama, it’s Friendly Food Certified: Friendly to Your Health, Friendly to the Workers and Friendly to the Environment http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=1130

Why Vaccine Injured Kids are Rarely Compensated

by Barbara Loe Fisher

On Nov. 14, 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 into law, instituting first-time vaccine safety reforms in the U.S. vaccination system and creating the first no-fault federal vaccine injury compensation program alternative to a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers and pediatricians. Twenty-two years later, on Nov. 18, 2008, I made a statement to the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) and questioned whether the compensation program is fatally flawed and so broken that it should be repealed. Many parents are wondering whether it would be better to return to civil court without restrictions to sue vaccine manufacturers and doctors for injuries and deaths their children suffered after receiving federally recommended vaccines.

During its two-decade history, two out of three individuals applying for federal vaccine injury compensation have been turned away empty-handed even though to date $1.8 billion has been awarded to more than 2,200 plaintiff’s out of some 12,000 who have applied. Today, nearly 5,000 vaccine injury claims are sitting in limbo because they represent children, who suffered brain and immune system dysfunction after vaccination but have been diagnosed with regressive autism, which is not recognized by the program as a compensable event. There is $2.7 billion sitting in the Trust Fund which could have been awarded to vaccine victims.

At the time of the law’s creation in 1986, Congress said they were committed to setting up a fair, expedited, non-adversarial, less traumatic, less expensive no-fault compensation mechanism alternative to civil litigation. But Congress also acknowledged that any legislation providing liability protection must also be equally committed to preventing vaccine harm. The Act contains strong safety provisions, including first-time mandates for doctors to record and report serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths after vaccination and give parents written benefit and risk information before a child is vaccinated.

But few of the safety provisions have been enforced and, as I testified in Congress in 1999 and again at the Nov. 18 ACCV meeting, there has been a betrayal of the promise that was made to parents about how the compensation program would be implemented. Obtaining compensation has become a highly adversarial, time-consuming, traumatic and expensive process for families of vaccine injured children and far too many vaccine victims have been denied compensation while vaccine makers and doctors have enjoyed liability protection and dozens of doses of nine new vaccines have been added to the childhood vaccine schedule.

I pointed out that federal court judges are beginning to look back at the legislative history of the Act, which so clearly affirms the intent of Congress when creating it. In recent court decisions, judges have agreed with parents and their attorneys that the compensation program has become far too difficult for plaintiffs. A recent state Supreme Court ruling also reiterated that Congress never intended to shield vaccine manufacturers from ALL liability for vaccine injuries and deaths when it could be demonstrated that a safer product could have been marketed.

In a Supreme Court of Georgia ruling on October 6, 2008 in American Home Products v. Ferrari, the justices unanimously held that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act does not give a vaccine manufacturer blanket immunity from vaccine injury lawsuits if it can be proven that the company could have made a safer vaccine. Georgia Supreme Court Justice George Carley wrote that the 1986 law and “the congressional intent behind it shows that the Vaccine Act does not pre-empt all design defect claims.” He added that Congress did not “use language which indicates that use of the compensation system is mandatory” but only “an appealing alternative” to the courts.

Justice Carley wrote that there is no evidence that “FDA approval alone renders a vaccine unavoidably safe” and said “We hesitate to hold that a manufacturer is excused from making changes it knows will improve its product merely because an older, more dangerous version received FDA approval,” adding that to do so would have “the perverse effect” of granting complete immunity from liability to an entire industry and he concluded that “in the absence of any clear and manifest congressional purpose to achieve that result, we must reject such a far-reaching interpretation.”

During the ACCV meeting, longtime plaintiff’s attorney Sherry Drew gave a moving description of the suffering that families with vaccine injured children endure and, during public comment at the end of the meeting, Jim Moody, of SafeMinds, and Vicky Debold, RN, PhD joined me in urging the Committee to recommend to the new Secretary of DHHS that more vaccine injured children be compensated. This was echoed by outgoing parent ACCV member Tawny Buck, of Alaska, who has a DPT vaccine injured daughter and new ACCV parent member Sarah Hoiberg, of Florida, who has a DTaP vaccine injured daughter.

In the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, the Institute of Medicine was directed to review the medical literature for scientific evidence that vaccines can cause injury and death, which resulted in landmark reports to Congress in 1991 and 1994 providing that evidence. IOM announced at the ACCV meeting that it has recently been contracted by the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) to assemble a Committee of scientific experts to review of the medical literature for evidence regarding the biological mechanisms for injury and death in association with varicella zoster (chicken pox), hepatitis B, meningococcal and HPV vaccine. There will be several public workshops during the Committee’s two-year study.

NVIC has been calling for basic science research into the biological mechanisms of vaccine injury and death for more than two decades. Without understanding how and why vaccines can cause brain and immune system dysfunction, there will be no way to develop pathological profiles to help scientifically confirm whether or not an individual has been injured or died from vaccination.

The truth about vaccine risks lies in the science, properly designed and conducted. The upcoming IOM review may be hampered by a lack of biological mechanism studies published in the medical literature but the review is also an opportunity to point the way to fill in those gaps in knowledge and the need for additional research that could become part of a national vaccine safety research agenda.

In the absence of scientific certainty, all children who regress into poor health after vaccination should be given a fair hearing in the federal vaccine injury compensation program and generously compensated when no other plausible cause can be found for what happened to them after vaccination. Congress intended the vaccine injury compensation program to be non-adversarial, fair, generous and humane. If it cannot function the way it was intended to function, then parents have every right to call for its repeal and a return to unrestricted lawsuits.
http://v.mercola.com/blogs/public_blog/Vaccine-Injury-Compensation–A-Failed-Experiment-in-Tort-Reform–72617.aspx

Soy – OY!

Monday, November 24th, 2008

The Weston A Price Foundation is an important source of nutritional information whose article on soy and its negative impact on the brain and the thyroid is worth reading.

If you do decide to eat soy products, please make sure that they are strictly organic since most soy beans grown in the US are Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and carry serious potential dangers in addition to those listed here.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv
Soy Alert!Soy and the Brain

By John MacArthur http://www.westonaprice.org/soy/soyandbrain.html

“Tofu Shrinks Brain!” No science fiction scenario, this sobering soybean revelation is for real. But how did the “poster bean” of the ’90s go wrong? Apparently, in many ways–none of which bode well for the brain.

In a major ongoing study involving 3,734 elderly Japanese-American men, those who ate the most tofu during midlife had up to 2.4 times the risk of later developing Alzheimer’s disease. As part of the three-decade long Honolulu-Asia Aging Study, 27 foods and drinks were correlated with participants’ health. Men who consumed tofu at least twice weekly had more cognitive impairment than those who rarely or never ate the soybean curd.1, 2

“The test results were about equivalent to what they would have been if they were five years older,” said lead researcher Dr. Lon R. White from the Hawaii Center for Health Research. For the guys who ate no tofu, however, they tested as though they were five years younger.

What’s more, higher midlife tofu consumption was also associated with low brain weight. Brain atrophy was assessed in 574 men using MRI results and in 290 men using autopsy information. Shrinkage occurs naturally with age, but for the men who had consumed more tofu, White said “their brains seemed to be showing an exaggeration of the usual patterns we see in aging.”
Phytoestrogens–Soy Self Defense

Tofu and other soybean foods contain isoflavones, three-ringed molecules bearing a structural resemblance to mammalian steroidal hormones. White and his fellow researchers speculate that soy’s estrogen-like compounds (phytoestrogens) might compete with the body’s natural estrogens for estrogen receptors in brain cells.

Plants have evolved many different strategies to protect themselves from predators. Some have thorns or spines, while others smell bad, taste bad, or poison animals that eat them. Some plants took a different route, using birth control as a way to counter the critters who were wont to munch.

Plants such as soy are making oral contraceptives to defend themselves, says Claude Hughes, Ph.D., a neuroendocrinologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. They evolved compounds that mimic natural estrogen. These phytoestrogens can interfere with the mammalian hormones involved in reproduction and growth–a strategy to reduce the number and size of predators.
Toxicologists Concerned about Soy’s Health Risks

The soy industry says that White’s study only shows an association between tofu consumption and brain aging, but does not prove cause and effect. On the other hand, soy experts at the National Center for Toxicological Research, Daniel Sheehan, Ph.D., and Daniel Doerge, Ph.D., consider this tofu study very important. “It is one of the more robust, well-designed prospective epidemiological studies generally available. . . We rarely have such power in human studies, as well as a potential mechanism.”

In a 1999 letter to the FDA (and on the ABC News program 20/20), the two toxicologists expressed their opposition to the agency’s health claims for soy, saying the Honolulu study “provides evidence that soy (tofu) phytoestrogens cause vascular dementia. Given that estrogens are important for maintenance of brain function in women; that the male brain contains aromatase, the enzyme that converts testosterone to estradiol; and that isoflavones inhibit this enzymatic activity, there is a mechanistic basis for the human findings.” 3

Although estrogen’s role in the central nervous system is not well understood, White notes that “a growing body of information suggests that estrogens may be needed for optimal repair and replacement of neural structures eroded with aging.”

One link to the puzzle may involve calcium-binding proteins, which are associated with protection against neurodegenerative diseases. In recent animal studies at Brigham Young University’s Neuroscience Center, researchers found that consumption of phytoestrogens via a soy diet for a relatively short interval can significantly elevate phytoestrogen levels in the brain and decrease brain calcium-binding proteins.4
Concerns About Giving Soy to Infants

The most serious problem with soy may be its use in infant formulas. “The amount of phytoestrogens that are in a day’s worth of soy infant formula equals 5 birth control pills,” says Mike Fitzpatrick, a New Zealand toxicologist. Fitzpatrick and other scientists believe that infant exposure to high amounts of phytoestrogens is associated with early puberty in girls and retarded physical maturation in boys.5

A study reported in The Lancet found that the “daily exposure of infants to isoflavones in soy infant-formulas is 6-11 fold higher on a bodyweight basis than the dose that has hormonal effects in adults consuming soy foods.” (This dose, equivalent to two glasses of soy milk per day, was enough to change menstrual patterns in women.6 In the blood of infants tested, concentrations of isoflavones were 13,000-22,000 times higher than natural estrogen concentrations in early life.7 )
Soy Interferes with Enzymes

While soybeans are relatively high in protein compared to other legumes, they are a poor source of protein because other proteins found in soybeans act as potent enzyme inhibitors. These “anti-nutrients” block the action of trypsin and other enzymes needed for protein digestion. Trypsin inhibitors are large, tightly folded proteins that are not completely deactivated during ordinary cooking and can reduce protein digestion. Therefore, soy consumption may lead to chronic deficiencies in amino acid uptake.8

Soy’s ability to interfere with enzymes and amino acids may have direct consequence for the brain. As White and his colleagues suggest, “isoflavones in tofu and other soyfoods might exert their influence through interference with tyrosine kinase-dependent mechanisms required for optimal hippocampal function, structure and plasticity.”2

High amounts of protein tyrosine kinases are found in the hippocampus, a brain region involved with learning and memory. One of soy’s primary isoflavones, genistein, has been shown to inhibit tyrosine kinase in the hippocampus, where it blocked “long-term potentiation,” a mechanism of memory formation.9
Tyrosine, Dopamine, and Parkinson’s Disease

The brain uses the amino acids tyrosine or phenylalanine to synthesize the key neurotransmitters dopamine and norepinephrine, brain chemicals that promote alertness and activity. Dopamine is crucial to fine muscle coordination. People whose hands tremble from Parkinson’s disease have a diminished ability to synthesize dopamine. An increased incidence of depression and other mood disorders are associated with low levels of dopamine and norepinephrine. Also, the current scientific consensus on attention-deficit disorder points to a dopamine imbalance.

Soy has been shown to affect tyrosine hydroxylase activity in animals, causing the utilization rate of dopamine to be “profoundly disturbed.” When soy lecithin supplements were given throughout perinatal development, they reduced activity in the cerebral cortex and “altered synaptic characteristics in a manner consistent with disturbances in neural function.”10

Researchers at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute and at the National Institutes of Health are finding a connection between tyrosine hydroxylase activity, thyroid hormone receptors, and depleted dopamine levels in the brain–particularly in the substantia nigra, a region associated with the movement difficulties characteristic of Parkinson’s disease.11,12,13
Soy Affects the Brain via the Thyroid Gland

Tyrosine is crucial to the brain in another way. It’s needed for the body to make active thyroid hormones, which are a major physiological regulator of mammalian brain development. By affecting the rate of cell differentiation and gene expression, thyroid hormones regulate the growth and migration of neurons, including synaptic development and myelin formation in specific brain regions. Low blood levels of tyrosine are associated with an underactive thyroid gland.

It is well known that isoflavones in soy products can depress thyroid function, causing goiter (enlarged thyroid gland) and autoimmune thyroid disease. In the early 1960s, goiter and hypothyroidism were reported in infants fed soybean diets.14 Scientists at the National Center for Toxicological Research showed that the soy isoflavones genistein and daidzein “inhibit thyroid peroxidase-catalyzed reactions essential to thyroid hormone synthesis.”15

Japanese researchers studied effects on the thyroid from soybeans administered to healthy subjects. They reported that consumption of as little as 30 grams (two tablespoons) of soybeans per day for only one month resulted in a significant increase in thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), which is produced by the brain’s pituitary gland when thyroid hormones are too low. Their findings suggested that “excessive soybean ingestion for a certain duration might suppress thyroid function and cause goiters in healthy people, especially elderly subjects.”16
Thyroid Hormones and Fetal Brain Development

Thyroid alterations are among the most frequently encountered autoimmune conditions in children. Researchers at Cornell University Medical College showed that the “frequency of feedings with soy-based milk formulas in early life was significantly higher in children with autoimmune thyroid disease.”17 In a previous study, they found that twice as many diabetic children had received soy formula in infancy as compared to non-diabetic children.18

Recognizing the risk, Swiss health authorities recommend “very restrictive use” of soy for babies. In England and Australia, public health agencies tell parents to first seek advice from a doctor before giving their infants soy formula. The New Zealand Ministry of Health recommends that “Soy formula should only be used under the direction of a health professional for specific medical indications. . . Clinicians who are treating children with a soy-based infant formula for medical conditions should be aware of the potential interaction between soy infant formula and thyroid function.”19

Thyroid hormones exert their influence during discrete windows of time during development of the infant. Inappropriate hormone levels can have a devastating effect on the developing human brain, especially during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy when the fetus depends on the mother’s thyroid hormones for brain development. After that, both maternal and fetal thyroid hormone levels affect the central nervous system.

A 1999 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that pregnant women with underactive thyroids were four times more likely to have children with low IQs if the disorder were left untreated. The study found that 19 percent of the children born to mothers with thyroid deficiency had IQ scores of 85 or lower, compared with only 5 percent of those born to mothers without such problems.20
Thyroid, Brain, and Environmental Toxins

Children exposed prenatally and during infancy to common environmental toxins like dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can suffer behavioral, learning, and memory problems because these chemicals may be disrupting the normal action of thyroid hormone.21

Soybeans grown in the United States contain residues of the pesticide dieldrin, an organochlorine similar to DDT. Although both chemicals were banned in the 1970s, dieldrin still persists in soils and is absorbed through the roots. Today it is the most toxic residue found on domestic soybeans.22 In Silent Spring, Rachel Carson warned that dieldrin is nearly 50 times as poisonous as DDT. In addition to disrupting hormones, it can have long delayed neurological effects, ranging from loss of memory to mania.23 Chinese aphids were recently discovered in fields scattered across Wisconsin, so increased pesticide applications are likely.

Combinations of insecticides, weed killers, and artificial fertilizers–even at low levels–have measurable detrimental effects on thyroid and other hormones as well as on the brain.24 EPA scientists now want to upgrade the commonly used herbicide, atrazine, to a “likely carcinogen.” In animal tests, atrazine attaches to sites on the hypothalamus, a crucial brain region involved with regulating levels of stress and sex hormones.25

Individuals newly diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease were more than twice as likely to have been exposed to insecticides in their home, compared to those without the disease.26 In September 2000, The Lancet reported that farmers and gardeners regularly exposed to pesticides may have more than five times the risk of developing mild cognitive dysfunction.

Soy formulas for infants can contain other neurotoxins: aluminum, cadmium, and fluoride. Studies found that aluminum concentrations in soy-based formulas were a 100-fold greater compared to human breast milk,27 while cadmium content was 8-15 times higher than in milk-based formulas.28 In an Australian study, the fluoride content of soy-based formulas ranged from 1.08 to 2.86 parts per million. The authors concluded that “prolonged consumption (beyond 12 months of age) of infant formula reconstituted with optimally-fluoridated water could result in excessive amounts of fluoride being ingested.”29 A study of Connecticut children revealed that mild to moderate fluorosis was strongly associated with soy-based infant formula use.30

In May 2000, Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility released their report, “The Toxic Threats to Child Development.” In the section on neurotoxins, they concluded, “Studies in animals and human populations suggest that fluoride exposure, at levels that are experienced by a significant proportion of the population whose drinking water is fluoridated, may have adverse impacts on the developing brain.”31
Iodine versus Fluorine

The thyroid gland uses tyrosine and the natural element iodine to make thyroxine (T4), a thyroid hormone containing four iodine atoms. The other, much more biologically active thyroid hormone is tri-iodothyronine (T3), which has three iodine atoms. Lack of dietary iodine has long been identified as the problem in diminished thyroid hormone synthesis.

According to the International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders: “Iodine deficiency has been called the world’s major cause of preventable mental retardation. Its severity can vary from mild intellectual blunting to frank cretinism, a condition that includes gross mental retardation, deaf mutism, short stature, and various other defects. . . The damage to the developing brain results in individuals poorly equipped to fight disease, learn, work effectively, or reproduce satisfactorily.”

This crucial role of iodine is another reason why the thyroid gland is especially vulnerable today. Canadian researcher Andreas Schuld has documented more than 100 studies during the last 70 years that demonstrate adverse effects of fluoride on the thyroid gland.32 Schuld says, “Fluorine, being the strongest in the group of halogens, will seriously interfere with iodine and iodine synthesis, forcing more urinary elimination of ingested iodine as fluoride ingestion or absorption increases.” (See page 21.)
Soy Inhibits Zinc Absorption

The high phytic-acid content in soy may also have adverse effects on brain function. Phytic acid is an organic acid present in the outer portion of all seeds which blocks the uptake of essential minerals in the intestinal tract: calcium, magnesium, iron, and especially zinc. Soybeans have very high levels of a form of phytic acid that is particularly difficult to neutralize and which interferes with zinc absorption more completely than with other minerals.

The soy industry acknowledges the problem with the admission that while “one-half cup of cooked soybeans contains one mg of zinc

. . . zinc is poorly absorbed from soyfoods.” As for iron, “both phytate and soy protein reduce iron absorption so that the iron in soyfoods is generally poorly absorbed.”33

According to unpublished documents, researchers testing soy formula found that it caused negative zinc balance in every infant to whom it was given.34 Even when the diets were additionally supplemented with zinc, there was a strong correlation between phytate content in formula and poor growth.
Zinc and the Brain

Relatively high levels of zinc are found in the brain, especially the hippocampus. Zinc plays an important role in the transmission of the nerve impulse between brain cells. Deficiency of zinc during pregnancy and lactation has been shown to be related to many congenital abnormalities of the nervous system in offspring. In children, “insufficient levels of zinc have been associated with lowered learning ability, apathy, lethargy, and mental retardation.”35

The USDA references a study of 372 Chinese school children with very low levels of zinc in their bodies. The children who received zinc supplements had the most improved performance–especially in perception, memory, reasoning, and psychomotor skills such as eye-hand coordination. Three earlier studies with adults also showed that changes in zinc intake affected cognitive function.36

New research has identified a specific contingent of neurons, called “zinc-containing” neurons, which are found almost exclusively in the forebrain, where in mammals they have evolved into a “complex and elaborate associational network that interconnects most of the cerebral cortices and limbic structures.” This suggests the importance of zinc in the normal and pathological processes of the cerebral cortex.37 Furthermore, age-related tissue zinc deficiency may contribute to brain cell death in Alzheimer’s dementia.38
Not a Good Idea

High levels of phytoestrogens and zinc-blocking phytic acid, plus additional neurotoxic compounds such as dieldrin, aluminum, fluoride and cadmium combine in soy to yield a veritable witches’ brew that can have adverse effects on the brain during development and throughout life.

Unfortunately, many American are now consuming soy foods in high amounts as infant formula, soy milk and tofu-based products, usually as a substitute for nourishing animal foods. In Asia, soy is consumed in small amounts as a fermented condiment and not as a substitute for animal foods.

Asians recognize the need for “brain foods” like eggs and fish and realize that large amounts of soy can cause thyroid problems and inhibit growth. They know that for optimum mental function, soy foods are not a good idea.

References

1. White LR, Petrovich H, Ross GW, Masaki KH, Association of mid-life consumption of tofu with late life cognitive impairment and dementia: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Fifth International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease, #487, 27 July 1996, Osaka, Japan.

2. White LR, Petrovitch H, Ross GW, Masaki KH, Hardman J, Nelson J, Davis D, Markesbery W, Brain aging and midlife tofu consumption. J Am Coll Nutr 2000 Apr;19(2):242-55.

3. Doerge and Sheehan, Letter to the FDA, Feb 18, 1999. (http://abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_000609_soyfdaletter_feature.htm)

4. Lephart ED, Thompson JM, Setchell KD, Adlercreutz H, Weber KS, Phytoestrogens decrease brain calcium-binding proteins… Brain Res 2000 Mar 17;859(1):123-31.

5. Soy Infant Formula Could Be Harmful to Infants: Groups Want it Pulled. Nutrition Week, Dec 10, 1999;29(46):1-2; See also www.soyonlineservice.co.nz

6. Cassidy A, Bingham S, Setchell KD, Biological effects of a diet of soy protein rich in isoflavones on the menstrual cycle of premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 1994 Sep;60(3):333-40.

7. Setchell KD, Zimmer-Nechemias L, Cai J, Heubi JE, Exposure of infants to phyto-oestrogens from soy-based infant formula. Lancet 1997 Jul 5;350(9070):23-27.

8. Fallon SA, Enig MG, Tragedy and Hype, The Third International Soy Symposium. Nexus Magazine, Vol 7, No 3, April-May 2000.

9. O’Dell TJ, Kandel ER, Grant SG, Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus is blocked by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Nature 1991 Oct 10 353:6344 558-60.

10. Bell JM, Whitmore WL, Cowdery T, Slotkin TA, Perinatal dietary supplementation with a soy lecithin preparation: effects on development of central catecholaminergic neurotransmitter systems. Brain Res Bull 1986 Aug;17(2):189-95.

11. Zetterstrom RH, Williams R, Perlmann T, Olson L, Cellular expression of the immediate early transcription factors Nurr1 and NGFI-B suggests a gene regulatory role in several brain regions including the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1996 Sep 5;41(1-2):111-20.

12. Castillo SO, Baffi JS, Palkovits M, Goldstein DS, Kopin IJ, Witta J, Magnuson MA, Nikodem VM, Dopamine biosynthesis is selectively abolished in substantia nigra… Mol Cell Neurosci 1998 May;11(1-2):36-46.

13. Baffi JS, Palkovits M, Castillo SO, Mezey E, Nikodem VM, Differential expression of tyrosine hydroxylase in catecholaminergic neurons of neonatal wild-type and Nurr1-deficient mice. Neuroscience 1999;93(2):631-42.

14. Shepard TH, Soybean goiter. New Eng J Med 1960;262:1099-1103.

15. Divi RL, Chang HC, Doerge DR, Anti-thyroid isoflavones from soybean: isolation, characterization, mechanisms of action. Biochem Pharmacol 1997 Nov 15;54(10):1087-96.

16. Ishizuki Y, Hirooka Y, Murata Y, Togashi K, The effects on the thyroid gland of soybeans administered experimentally in healthy subjects. Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi 1991 May 20;67(5):622-29.

17. Fort P, Moses N, Fasano M, Goldberg T, Lifshitz F, Breast and soy-formula feedings in early infancy and the prevalence of autoimmune thyroid disease in children. J Am Coll Nutr 1990 Apr;9(2):164-67.

18. Fort P, Lanes R, Dahlem S, Recker B, Weyman-Daum M, Pugliese M, Lifshitz FJ, Breast feeding and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in children. Am Coll Nutr 1986;5(5):439-41.

19. Regulatory Guidance in other countries: New Zealand Ministry of Health Position Statement on Soy Formulas (http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/regulat.htm)(Adobe Acrobat PDF file: http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/files/mohsoy.pdf)

20. Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Allan WC, Williams JR, Knight GJ, Gagnon J, O’Heir CE, Mitchell ML, Hermos RJ, Waisbren SE, Faix JD, Klein RZ, Maternal thyroid deficiency during pregnancy and subsequent neuropsychological development of the child. N Engl J Med 1999 Aug 19;341(8):549-55.

21. Hauser P, McMillin JM, Bhatara VS, Resistance to thyroid hormone: implications for neurodevelopmental research on the effects of thyroid hormone disruptors. Toxicol Ind Health 1998 Jan-Apr;14(1-2):85-101.

22. Groth E, Benbrook CM, Lutz K, Update: pesticides in children’s foods, an analysis of 1998 USDA PDP data on pesticide residues, Consumers Union of U.S., Inc., May, 2000 (Adobe Acrobat PDF file).

23. Hayes WJ, The toxicity of dieldrin to man. Bull World Health Organ 1959;20:891-92.

24. Porter WP, Jaeger JW, Carlson IH, Endocrine, immune and behavioral effects of aldicarb (carbamate), atrazine (triazine) and nitrate (fertilizer) mixtures at groundwater concentrations. Toxicol Ind Health 1999 Jan-Mar;15(1-2):133-50.

25. Watson, Traci, Common herbicide likely causes cancer. USA Today, June 29, 2000.

26. Nelson L, American Academy of Neurology’s 52nd annual meeting in San Diego, CA, April 29-May 6, 2000.

27. McGraw M, Bishop N, Jameson R, Robinson MJ, O’Hara M, Hewitt CD, Day JP, Aluminium content of milk formulae and intravenous fluids used in infants.Lancet 1986 Jan 18;1(8473):157.

28. Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD, Lead, cadmium, and fluoride levels in market milk and infant formulas in Canada. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 1987;70(4):754-57.

29. Silva M, Reynolds EC, Fluoride content of infant formulae in Australia. Aust Dent J 1996 Feb;41(1):37-42.

30. Pendrys DG, Katz RV, Morse DE, Risk factors for enamel fluorosis in a fluoridated population. Am J Epidemiol 1994 Sep 1;140(5):461-71.

31. Schettler T, Stein J, Reich F, Valenti M, In Harm’s Way: Toxic Threats to Child Development. (http://www.igc.org/psr/ihw.htm) Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility, May 2000.

32. Studies dealing with fluoride and thyroid. (http://www.bruha.com/fluoride/html/thyroid_studies.htm)See also: Fluoride Controversy in the Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients. (http://www.tldp.com/fluoride.htm)

33. Soy Nutritive Content, United Soybean Board. (http://www.talksoy.com/nutritive1.htm)

34. Pfeiffer CC, Braverman ER, Zinc, the brain and behavior. Biol Psychiatry 1982 Apr;17(4):513-32.

35. Personal communication with Dr. Mary G. Enig

36. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food & Nutrition Research Briefs, July 1997. (http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/usda/fnrb/fnrb797.html)

37. Frederickson CJ, Suh SW, Silva D, Frederickson CJ, Thompson RB, Importance of zinc in the central nervous system: the zinc-containing neuron. J Nutr 2000 May;130(5S Suppl):1471S-83S.

38. Ho LH, Ratnaike RN, Zalewski PD, Involvement of intracellular labile zinc in suppression of DEVD-caspase activity in human neuroblastoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000 Feb 5;268(1):148-54.

Natural Solutions International Peace Research Institute

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

The Trustees of the Foundation take great pleasure in announcing the establishment of a private association, NGO, the International Peace Research Institute. The purpose of the institute is to further the intention expressed through our International Decade of Nutrition, “to discover, develop, demonstrate and disseminate Natural Solutions for achieving and maintaining World Peace…”

The text of the establishing Resolution is reproduced below.

The initial President of the Institute is Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine (USA ret). Dr. Rima E. Laibow is the Director of the Institute and Ralph Fucetola JD is its Secretary.

The first public act of the Institute was to deliver a statement on Health, Peace and Honest Money to the “End the Fed” Rally at the Federal Reserve Building, New York City, on November 22, 2008.

“War is bad for your health. Unstable money systems are the tool of those who generate wars for their own financial health. Health freedom implies the freedom to live free from the threat of engineered wars to enrich the few and kill and subjugate the many. It also implies the right to earn enough real money to support the health and well being of your body, your family, your community and your world.”

You can see the entire message at:
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=1462

And a video of the Rally at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9PSETSdTgw

————————————————
Resolution Establishing
The Private Association of the
Natural Solutions
International Peace Research Institute

This Resolution is adopted under authority of the Natural Solutions Foundation, duly filed as a non-profit private interest entity in the Republic of Panama on December 11, 2007 (Escritura No. 16996) in cooperation with the Natural Solutions Foundation, a not for profit Nevada corporation recognized as exempt in the United States.

1. Establishment. The Trustees of the Foundation do hereby establish a private, international non-governmental Association known as the Natural Solutions Foundation International Peace Research Institute, herein, the Institute. The juridical location of the Institute shall be in Chiriqui Province of the Republic of Panama or wherever the Trustees shall from time to time determine by written Resolution. It is a Foundation integrated auxiliary.

2. Mission. A. The Institute is established exclusively for charitable, educational, literary and scientific research purposes. The Primary Goal of the Institute, as a private international association, is to discover, develop, demonstrate and disseminate Natural Solutions for achieving and maintaining World Peace in conjunction with the overall Mission of the Foundation. In accordance with Escritura No. 16996, the “Foundation is constituted with the purpose to promote, develop and execute projects with charitable purposes in Panama and in other countries around the world.”

3. Participants. Appropriate persons or other entities may be invited by the Trustees to participate in the Institute as Benefactors, Participants, Advisers or Associates under this Resolution (in general, the Associates of the Institute). Voting rights in the Institute are restricted as provided herein.

4. Governance. A. The Governing Structures of the Institute are: (1) the Foundation Trustees to exercise overall oversight over the general programs and policies of the Institute and to appoint and remove the Associates of the Institute, Members of the Council and the Officers thereof, (2) the Officers of the Institute and (3) the Institute Council to advise the Trustees and Officers on Institute matters. The Council shall act by signed, dated, written Resolutions or Rules consistent with this Resolution, by absolute majority, with the consent of the Trustees who retain a veto over Officer and Council actions, and in the event of deadlock, the Trustees are empowered to act on behalf of the Institute.

B. The Foundation, in accordance with the provisions of the Escritura, does not affiliate with any political or religious organization. The Institute shall not restrict non-violent and individually respectful political and religious expression and permits religious organizations whose beliefs are compatible with the Mission of the Institute to associate and participate with the Institute, upon approval of the Trustees.

5. Officers. The Director of the Institute is the Chief Executive Officer and supervisor of the Institute and shall preside over its Officers, Council and activities, under Resolutions or Rules adopted by the Council that are not inconsistent with this Resolution. The Director and such Assistant Directors and Associate Directors as the Council may determine shall be appointed, and are removable by the Trustees.

6. Authority. The Governing Structure, or their duly appointed successors and agents, shall have full and absolute power, control and authority over the activities and property of the Institute, subject only to the limitations expressly stated in this Resolution and the Escritura, including those expressed herein, and to do following:

(1) To purchase, lease or otherwise acquire real or other property, and to conserve or improve, or to sell, exchange, lease, mortgage, grant easements, pledge, or in any manner dispose of, encumber, improve or deal with the property of the Institute or any part thereof or any interest therein, upon such terms and for such consideration as they deem proper (by Resolutions or Rules of the Council, with the consent of the Director and Trustees;

(2) to incur indebtedness, borrow, or lend money with or without security; enter into contracts of all kinds; execute, accept, discount, negotiate and deal in commercial paper, evidence of indebtedness and securities or options of all types whatsoever; to purchase or otherwise acquire gold, silver, precious materials and objects of all types; and execute conveyances, mortgages, security agreements, leases, and any other instruments, all on behalf of the Institute only (by Resolutions or Rules of the Council, with the consent of the Director and Trustees;

(3) to compromise or settle any suits, claims or demands, or waive any rights relating to the property of the Institute (by Resolutions or Rules of the Council with the consent of the Director and Trustees;;

(4) to appoint officers, agents, attorneys, brokers, accountants, ministers, and servants, providing the same (where appropriate) reasonable allowances, fees, commissions, salaries and expenses, as well as paying professional and other proper expenses (and to suspend any appointee, or terminate any appointee for cause) (by the Director under Resolutions or Rules of the Council);

(5) to sue, prosecute and defend any and all actions in Courts of Law or Equity and before Arbitration Tribunals, or elsewhere, affecting the Institute or its property (by the Director with the consent of the Trustees;);

(6) to incorporate the Institute in such jurisdiction(s) as may be convenient and necessary for the proper functioning of the Institute (by Resolutions or Rules of the Council with the consent of the Director and Trustees);

(7) to carry-on the International Peace Research activities of the Institute internationally and to present, as an NGO, its concerns to individuals, groups and organizations throughout the world (by Resolutions or Rules of the Foundation Council with the consent of the Director and Trustees;);

7. Limitations. Insofar as any of the activities of the Foundation is subject to United States jurisdiction, the following limitations, numbered 1 through 5 shall apply to those activities of the Foundation. Insofar as the Foundation or Institute is subject to Panama jurisdiction, the following limitations, numbered 6 through 7 shall apply. Insofar as the laws of other jurisdictions, including international law, provide for similar restrictions to qualify as a non-governmental organization (NGO) under United Nations or other auspices, such similar restrictions, or other requirements, as may be required, may be adopted by Resolution of the Council, approved by the Trustees.

(1) The Foundation shall carry on no activities not permitted to be carried on [1] by a body exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (or the corresponding provision of any future United States internal revenue law) or [2] by a body, contributions to which are deductible under section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (or the corresponding provision of any future United States internal revenue law).

(2) No substantial part of the activities of the Institute shall be carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, or participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf or any candidate for political office or public office.

(3) In the event of dissolution, all of the remaining assets and property of the Institute shall, after necessary expenses, thereof, be distributed to such organizations as shall qualify under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (or the corresponding provision of any future United States internal revenue law), and the purposes of which are compatible with the purposes of the Institute.

(4) No part of the income of the Institute shall inure to the private benefit of any member, advisor, or official, or any private individual (except reasonable compensation for services to or for the Institute) and no adviser or official of the Institute, or any private individual, shall be entitled to share in the distribution of the assets on dissolution.

(5) In determining compensation, if any, for officers and trustees, the Institute shall approve compensation arrangements, follow a conflict of interest policy, approve compensation arrangements in advance of paying compensation and document in writing the date and terms of approved compensation arrangements, record in writing the decision made by each individual who decided or voted on compensation arrangements, approve compensation arrangements based on information about compensation paid by similarly situated taxable or tax-exempt organizations for similar services, current compensation surveys compiled by independent firms, or actual written offers from similarly situated organizations, and record in writing both the information on which you relied to base your decision and its source. Furthermore, the Board shall adopt a standard Conflict of Interest Policy.

(6) “The Foundation is a nonprofit private interest entity, without any affiliation [“adscripcion” = “ascription”] to any political or religious organization. Nevertheless, it may carry out mercantile activities in a non-customary manner, or exercise the rights coming from the titles representing the capital of mercantile corporations that are from the foundation’s patrimony as far of the results of such economic activities are exclusively done for the purposes of the foundation.”

(7) This Resolution is subject to all other limitations and provisions of Escriura No. 16996.

8. Amendment. This Resolution may be amended only upon a written Resolution proposed by any Officer, adopted by the Council, with the consent of all the Trustees.

9. Arbitration and Mediation; Law. All disputes arising under, or involving the meaning of this Resolution and Resolutions or Rules of the Council, or among the Associates of the Institute, including the trustees, benefactors, participants, associates, directors, council members, officers, advisors, homestead heirs, the Institute and its agencies, shall be settled by mediation and binding arbitration. Any such dispute may be referred by any party for binding arbitration pursuant to the Rules then in effect, and under the auspices of the International Chambers of Commerce (as near the location of the occurrence as possible), or such other arbitrator to which the parties may agree.

C. Any arbitration decision may be enforced in any tribunal of competent jurisdiction.

D. In general, the Directors, Officers, Council and agents of the Institute shall seek advice and consult with the Trustees and Participants, Advisors or Associates about matters affecting them, seeking to reach consensus wherever possible.

E. General principles of right and justice, with this Resolution, are the primary source of the law of this private contract among the persons mentioned herein. The law of the Republic of Panama or other competent jurisdiction, where not inconsistent, shall also govern.

F. All Associates of the Institute pledge to act honestly, honorably and in good faith toward the Institute and the other Associates of the Institute, without unreasonably withholding required consents and without unreasonable delay. The autonomy, human rights and property (including Intellectual Property) of each participant is inviolate.

Unanimously adopted by the Trustees as of the 22nd day of November, 2008.

“End the Fed” Comments by Gen. Stubblebine links Food Freedom and Economic System

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

The End the Fed Rallies took place on November 22, 2008 in front of every Federal Reserve Building in the United States.

Natural Solutions Foundation and Natural Solutions Peace Research Institute were there, represented by Foundation Trustee Ralph Fucetola. He presented the message General Stubblebine prepared for this important occassion. This message follows.

Click here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9PSETSdTgw) to watch the video of this important speech.

Natural Solutions Foundation
Peace Research Institute

Statement at End the Fed Rally, NYC – November 22, 2008
Ralph Fucetola JD, NSF Trustee

Good afternoon. I am speaking today on behalf of the Natural Solutions Foundation Peace Research Institute and have a message for you from our President, Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine, US Army, retired: “War is bad for your health. Unstable money systems are the tool of those who generate wars for their own financial health. Health freedom implies the freedom to live free from the threat of engineered wars to enrich the few and kill and subjugate the many. It also implies the right to earn enough real money to suport the health and well being of your body, your family, your community and your world.”

Without a stable and sensible, non-fiat currency to direct and drive both our foreign and domestic policy, we have no hope of health, of peace or of freedom. I urge you to become active in the twin campiagns to secure your health freedom from the forces which are destroying it as we speak and your fiancial liberation from the same forces which are enslaving you through fiat currency and the diabolical Fed system, again, even as we speak and rally.

Natural Solutions Foundation and the Natural Solutions Foundation Peace Research Institute offer natural solutions to these complex, intertwined and devastatingly dangerous problems.
We urge you to link minds and efforts with us to lead the successful battle against these twin dangers.

Recall for a moment the chilling and famous statement of Meyer Rothschild who said, “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws ….” and the history of the fiat money managers who have engineered and financed every war since the American Revolution by creating bellicose causes on both side, financing both sides and creating the fiat funds to purchase the resulting devastation… and doing it over and over again.

And make no mistake. This greed and inhumanity has no religion. It has no economic or political theory or creed, but its own well being… and it has neither mercy nor compassion.

The Federal Reserve, like Codex Alimentarius, is a complex, globalized and globalizing system of domination designed to enslave and/or kill you, either rapidly or slowly.

But we are not slaves. We are free men and women who must choose our own destiny and reject the nefarious plans of those who would control us through inauthentic means and through gile.

Now is the time. The system of central state control of the value of our money has been exposed as corrupted and as a failure. Through peaceful, intelligent and persuasive means, we must wage a war of peace and health for ourselves and our future. We call for a true return to a real commodity money standard set by markets, not politicians. As the Constitution teaches, no state shall make anything but gold and silver a legal tender for debt.

We reject the usurpation of Constitutional right which the Federal Reserve represents. That usurpation, over a century old, known as the “Legal Tender Cases” abrogated to the US Government the unconstitutional power to declare legal tender and led directly to the crisis of the moment. This usurpation must end: End the Fed! Return to Constitutional money!

During the hundred years before the Fed, twenty dollars was one ounce of fine gold. At the end of that hundred years, the gold dollar bought more than at the start. Today, after nearly a hundred years of the Federal Reserve fiat money fraud, the dollar has lost 99% of its value! Today, if you can find it, a one ounce gold coin will cost about one thousand Federal Reserve Fraud Notes.

The Natural Solutions Foundation welcomes you and your creativity and capacities. You can reach us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and join our community of strength by signing up for our eAlerts and letting everyone, and I do mean EVERYONE, you know understand that this is a major issue and you are an activated citizen urging them to become the same – an activated citizen.

Again, www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and the Health Freedom eAlerts.

This IS our country. It IS our monetary system. It IS our Health and, ultimately, it IS our freedom which is at stake. Thank you.

Maj. Gen Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.)

Natural Solutions Foundation
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
Natural Solutions Foundation Peace Research Institute