Archive for the ‘The Law & CODEX’ Category

Weaponized Avian Flu: Current Intelligence Estimate of Situation.3

Monday, September 15th, 2008

In all the smoke and mirrors… shards of truth.

The Natural Solutions Foundation continually updates and expands it coverage of the breaking news, information and disinformation about the forthcoming, supposedly “inevitable pandemic” which is now acknowledged by such luminaries as the head of the CDC to be certain and very rapidly approaching, although whether it will be from Avian Flu or not, what the strain will be if it is, and exactly when and where it will appear are unknowns, at least to the general public. The logical impossibility of these statements is overlooked by frantic members of the public, who are officially advised to avoid complacency (whatever that means) and lay in stocks of food, water and medicines (which insurance companies will not cover if they will supply people for more than 30 days).

Links to the previous Estimates of Situation:
Internet Abuzz over Weaponized Avian Flu – http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=846

Estimate of Situation 2.1 – http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=794
Estimate of Situation 1 – http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=755

The announcement of a new Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA organism across Australia that appears to target healthy adolescents and not only infect, but kill them makes the waffle wording of the CDC’s latest statement particularly ominous. Has MRSA also been weaponized?

Since the causal role of industrial food production practices (including vaccinating birds “against” Avian Flu) is coming under scrutiny as a principle cause of Avian Flu outbreaks, it is relevant to note that antibiotic resistent organisms like Staphylococcus aureus are made that way through the subclinical administration of antibiotics to the animals we eat. The antibiotics they receive, and which we eat, either changed or rendered more toxic, in their eggs, flesh and milk, are given to them to keep them alive in the inhumane and unsanitary conditions in which they live. They are so crowded and poorly nourished that their immune systems collapse from the filth, “food” and stress under which they are reared so that the profit of the “farms” will be increased.

Food and health experts have long warned that the use of sub clinical antibiotics, and the “farming” practices that make them necessary would create plagues of resistant organisms which we had no bullets left to fire at once they made their way into the population. MRSA is only the first of many.

How interesting that MRSA vaccines have been under development for several years. For example, on Feb. 2, 2007, a new company devoted to producing MSRA vaccines was created in the UK. See commercialization items below.

http://bulletin.sciencebusiness.net/ebulletins/showissue.php3?page=/548/2230/7170

In 2007, Dr. Anthony Fiori presented a lecture refrenced by the CDC called “Introductory Session on Influenza Vaccines” presented to its influential Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in which he noted:

Compared to previous 2 seasons [2004-2005 and 2005-2006 – REL]
– Increase in mean age to 7 years (from 4-5 years in 2004-2006)*
– Increase in proportion with invasive MRSA-associated co-infection
from <5% to 27%
-preliminary data L Finelli, R Dhara, CDC- REL]

What he did not note was that the proportion of vaccinated children has been going up along with increased pediatric influenza deaths:

“As of June 22, 2007, CDC has received 67 reports of
influenza-associated pediatric deaths this influenza
season (2006-2007)
– 2005-2006: 45 deaths
– 2004-2005: 46 deaths
– 2003-2004: 153 deaths”.

Dr Fiore did, however, note that MRSA influenza, which presents itself as a bacterial co-infection, is now a significant cause of death in children

Also included in this interesting presentation is the anticipated schedule for revised influenza schedules:

“Potential Time-Frame for Modifying Influenza Vaccination Recommendations
• 2007-2008: Consider expanding recommendations to include school-age children
• 2010-2011: Consider expansion of recommendations to include household contacts and caregivers of school-aged children
• 2012-2013: Consider expansion to universal vaccination”
www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/ACIP/downloads/mtg-slides-jun07/26-influenza1-fiore.pdf

You might find it instructive to review the section of this presentation following the one cited above in which, despite clear evidence of dangers and deaths in young children receiving Flu Mist vaccine, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted to approve it for young children anyway.
If you have no financial interest in vaccines, as the Natural Soluitons Foundation and I do not, you might find the evidcence compelling AWAY from approval. If, on the other hand, you do have a fninanciaql interstes in the sale of vaccines, which is permitted under the FDA/CDC rules, you might have voted as the ACIP members did.

Also, remember that live virus vaccines in general, and inhaled ones like Flu Mist in particular, cause live, infective viruses to be shed for as long as 3 months. Thus, the sibling, friend or relative of a susceptible child, for example, a wheezing baby, can infect, and potentially kill, the child.

The drums beat louder every day and the manipulation of information and statistics continues to build and impel the juggernaut of pandemic panic. You are the primary target of this flood of disinformation. We are here to help you sort through it all; to become prepared in meaningful ways.

Based on our best assessment of information and events, here is our current Intelligence Estimate of Situation, starting with some important notes of interest.

NOTES:

1. It is becoming increasingly clear to us at the Natural Solutions Foundation that whether or not there is a pandemic reality attached to Avian Flu, this opportunity for commercialization and social control has taken on a life of its own in the political establishment. We foresee that the necessity to allow, create or synthesize a pandemic will drive the process in the very near future into a deadly reality. Ask yourself: just how many government and foundation grants to “study” weaponizing the flu, to how many labs around the world, would be necessary before it was certain that one of those engineered bugs would be released, by “accident” or by a disgruntled employee, as with the Anthrax panic of 2001?

2. The inflammatory propaganda designed to panic and intimidate you into accepting whatever comes next once a “Pandemic” is declared consistently fails to differentiate between human cases of Avian Flu and animal cases. That way, the impression is ceaselessly reinforced that the Pandemic is already here, jut not on your block yet. The reality is that no human to human transmission has been demonstrated.

3. Exercises like the one in New Mexico (see below) are taking place in every State. Nearly every State has passed Emergency Medical Powers Acts which make refusing vaccination a felony once the Governor identifies a state of Pandemic. The property of felons, and those who hold strategic assets in a pandemic can be seized/nationalized according to various Homeland Security Directives and Executive Orders cited in our earlier discussions of this issue.

4. Industrial animal rearing practices and genetic engineering are the causes of the Pandemic Avian Flu threat, to whatever extent that threat is real. See Kennedy Shortridge, PhD’s important quote below.

Remembering the distinction between pandemic human Avian Flu and poultry disease would help to bring accuracy and proportion to the reports. Since all headlines uniformly refer to the occurrences by the same term, “Avian Flu”, a casual, hurried or frightened reader will glean the global dangers of this “inevitable pandemic” when, in fact, human cases are still exceedingly rare.

5. Discussions of “Who Lives, Who Dies” and “Necessary Restrictions of liberties” Beginning to Surface. Expect a pounding barrage of items telling you to let others decide your future and restrict your freedoms. Personal freedom and survival will be decided by “Public Health and Emergency organizations” like FEMA. The preparation for this totalitarian culling will begin with articles, meetings and propaganda and then become public policy at the UN level as well as in the US.

See Tucson, AZ Daily Star article below. Becoming aware of the propaganda is important for your survival.

6. 2 Recent Avian Flu Fatalities in Indonesia Reported, First Since July. (For Comparison, 700,000 People Die Annually In US From Cardiac Disease). While we believe that a disseminated, intentional pandemic is highly likely, early alerts devoted to the “Natural Evolution” of this danger are irrational and illogical. However, to the propagandists, making sure that the public stays primed is of importance in softening resistance to control measures and forced vaccination. Two deaths globally in the last 6 weeks is a pretty poor showing for a Pandemic disease which is consistently billed in that fashion. Is this really the next Plague? This indicates to us the careful propaganda push behind these perceptions.

http://www.avianflutalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=21052

7. Powerful and influential forces are at work to both convince you that the Pandemic is inevitable and to set up the situation so that self-fulfilling prophecy is fulfilled. This August 29, 2008 article is worth repeating: “Scientists funded by the Wellcome Trust are to examine what is preventing the H5N1 avian influenza virus from causing a human pandemic and what mutations are required to realise its deadly potential. The research could hold the key to early identification of a potential influenza pandemic…”

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/wt-seb082908.php

8. Drug-Resistant ‘Superbug’ in Australia Fueling Fear of Epidemic
By Jill Stark, Melbourne Age (Australia), September 8, 2008

“Australia is facing an epidemic of a drug-resistant superbug that attacks healthy teenagers and can be fatal, leading scientists have warned. A summit of 350 international microbiologists will converge on Cairns today to discuss the global health threat posed by resistant staphylococcal infections — also known as MRSA superbugs. Of particular concern is a new virulent form of the flesh-eating bug that can lead to a severe form of pneumonia that causes death in up to 50% of cases.

Unlike hospital-acquired MRSA, which affects mostly elderly patients, the community strain of the bug carries far more toxic genes and can be picked up in communal settings. Similar bugs in the U.S. have led to the deaths of several teenagers and schools being shut and disinfected. Experts at the conference say the bug is on the rise in Australia and patients are presenting to emergency departments with infected boils that can lead to abscesses and gaping wounds.

Associate Professor Keryn Christiansen, director of microbiology at Royal Perth Hospital and co-ordinator of the conference, said antibiotics seemed to have no effect. ‘We’re looking at a major epidemic. These are much more virulent strains of these bugs We’re seeing more people coming to our emergency departments, more people admitted with more severe infections and we’re seeing people die. It’s happening right across Australia,’ she said.”
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_14536.cfm

Read on for more details…

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org

Listen to the Music: Pandemic Drum Beats:

The World Health Organization (WHO) notes that the drum beats for Pandemic Panic are not sufficiently arousing “Flu Fatigue’ Poses Public Health Threat, WHO Says.” http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=at0oOdQTLVE0&refer=home. [We can expect an increase in dire stories and more urgent warnings, whether or not they have any basis in reality. -REL]

1. New Bird Flu Strain Detected In Nigeria

A strain of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza previously not recorded in sub-Saharan Africa has been detected in Nigeria for the first time, FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization- REL] said today. Nigeria has recently reported two new Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza outbreaks in the states of Katsina and Kano.

Laboratory results from Nigeria and an FAO reference laboratory in Italy show that the newly discovered virus strain (H5N1, clade 2, EMA3) is genetically different from the strains that circulated in Nigeria during earlier outbreaks in 2006 and 2007. [Note that previous outbreaks represented zero danger to humans – REL] The new strain has never been reported before in Africa; it is more similar to strains previously identified in Europe (Italy), Asia (Afghanistan) and the Middle East (Iran) in 2007.

“It seems to be unlikely that wild birds have carried the strain to Africa, since the last migration of wild birds from Europe and Central Asia to Africa occurred in September 2007 and this year’s southerly migration into Africa has not really started yet,” Newman said. “It could well be that there are other channels for virus introduction: international trade, for example, or illegal and unreported movement of poultry. This increases the risk of avian influenza spread to other countries in Western Africa….

“Uncertainty about virus spread and transmission is a major challenge for control campaigns. [Indeed – REL] …. Since the avian influenza epidemic caused by the H5N1 strain started five years ago in Asia, the disease has affected over 60 countries [with virtually no human deaths despite deceptive statistics and media hype – REL]; the vast majority of countries have succeeded to eliminate the virus from poultry. In Nigeria, the virus was first confirmed in February 2006 and infected poultry in 25 states before being contained.” [Note: industrial poultry operations are paid more than market price for birds slaughtered “because” of Avian Flu, real or imagined. Subsistence farmers are paid nothing at all. WHO wants to eliminate backyard flocks totally despite the fact that Avian Flu infections do not occur in outdoor flocks AND almost always occur in previously vaccinated birds. Globalizing and industrializing the food supply is greatly assisted by these economically disastrous culls for peasant farmers which are, at the same time, highly profitable for industrial food producers. – REL]

Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations – Fri, 08/15/2008
http://www.emaxhealth.com/90/24003.html

2. New Mexico Helps Business Community Prepare For Pandemic Flu
About 130 business and health leaders in New Mexico attended “Economic Consequences of Pandemic Influenza along the United States – Mexico Border” this week as a part of the State’s efforts to help organizations mitigate the effects of a pandemic flu. The New Mexico Department of Health partnered with the New Mexico Economic Development’s Office of Mexican Affairs to explain how companies can prepare for the impact a pandemic flu could have on their business.
http://www.emaxhealth.com/90/23957.html

“We are looking for every opportunity to meet with different sectors of our community to make sure New Mexico is prepared for the disruption to services and businesses during a pandemic flu,” said Health Secretary Dr. Alfredo Vigil. “We appreciate businesses taking the time to learn about how they can develop plans to ensure minimal disruption to trade and commerce in the region….

‘Business leaders have a responsibility to be part of the solution in dealing with a potential pandemic. We must have measures in place that will prevent disruptions in the supply chain and have a plan to deliver goods and services if the workforce gets sick.’” [Perhaps there is another way to interpret this, but we see this as a clear preparatory step for government forces to nationalize supplies and distribution of goods and services when, not if, the pandemic is declared. This possibility is already embodied in various Homeland Security Directives and Executive Orders that allow for the nationalization of assets, resources, transportation and distribution property and systems. REL]

3. American Lung Association Urges Vaccination “Each and Every Year” In Its Influenza Prevention Program
Welcome to Faces of Influenza

[Reading this item, please ask yourself how much of the budget of the American Lung Association derives from the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry. And then ask yourself how the vaccine prevents influenza when the symptoms of the reaction to the vaccine are identical to the flu – a neat “escape hatch for the unpleasant, and unprofitable reality that vaccines frequently cause diseases they are designed to protect against. – REL]
“Welcome to Faces of Influenza—an educational Web site of the American Lung Association. This site is designed to put a face on influenza in the United States and show firsthand the seriousness of this potentially deadly infectious disease.

This site features special portraits of famous and not so famous Americans, who represent each of the influenza high-risk groups—persons health officials recommend receive an influenza vaccination, with its “trace” amount of mercury poison, each and every year.

Along with these dramatic portraits are compelling stories about their experience with influenza and the importance of annual immunization.

You will likely see yourself, family members and others among the many Faces of Influenza. You also will come to realize that influenza is not the common cold. It’s serious. Each year, approximately 226,000 Americans are hospitalized with complications from influenza. An average of 36,000 people, it is alleged, die from the virus and its complications. [As previously discussed by the Natural Solutions Foundation, these statistics are highly deceptive since ALL lung related deaths which could potentially, not actually, be associated with flu of ANY type are listed as deaths CAUSED BY influenza. – REL]

http://www.facesofinfluenza.org/home.php?utm_source=msn&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Philadelphia

4. “Bird Flu – A Virus of Own Hatching” by Michael Greger reinforces Industrial Fowl Production Cause of the Coming Pandemic.

[Note the continuing conflation of human and poultry infection which is described as “rampaging west to Russia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe.” despite the lack of a single human case in any of these areas of pandemic flu. -REL]

Kennedy Shortridge, PhD, DSc(Hon), CBiol, FIBiol has issued a critical statement in the introduction to this book:

“Indeed, molecular and genetic evidence suggests that the chicken is not a natural host for influenza. Rather, the domestic duck is the silent intestinal carrier of avian influenza viruses being raised in close proximity to habitation.”

“It is the siting of large-scale chicken production units, particularly in southern China where avian influenza viruses abound, that is the crux of the problem. There, domestic ducks have been raised on rivers, waterways, and, more recently, with the flooded rice crops cultivated each year. The importation of industrial poultry farming into that same region introduced millions of chickens—highly stressed due to intensive production practices and unsanitary conditions—into this avian influenza virus milieu. The result? An influenza accident waiting to happen. The H5N1 virus signaled its appearance in Hong Kong in 1997, and has since made its way into dozens of countries, infected millions of birds, and threatens to trigger a human catastrophe.”

“Michael Greger has taken on the formidable task of reviewing and synthesizing the many factors contingent upon chicken production that have brought us to the influenza threat the world now faces. Drawing upon scientific literature and media reports at large, Dr. Greger explores the hole we have dug for ourselves with our own unsavory practices.”

“Indeed, while governments and the poultry industry are quick to blame migratory birds as the source of the current H5N1 avian influenza virus, and to view pandemics as natural phenomena analogous to, say, sunspots and earthquakes, in reality, human choices and actions may have had—and may continue to have—a pivotal role in the changing ecology. Now that anthropogenic behavior has reached unprecedented levels with a concomitant pronounced zoonotic skew in emerging infectious diseases of humans, H5N1 seems like a cautionary tale of how attempts to exploit nature may backfire. The use of antibiotics as farm meal growth promoters leading to antibiotic-resistance in humans or the feeding of meat or bone meal to cattle leading to mad cow disease are cases in point: profitable in the short term for animal agriculture, but with the potential for unforeseen and disastrous consequences. Intensified, industrial poultry production has given us inexpensive chicken, but at what cost to the animals and at what heightened risk to public health?”

“We have reached a critical point. We must dramatically change animal farming practices for all animals.”

http://birdflubook.com/a.php?id=115

An excerpt from Dr. Greger’s introductory comments: “H5N1 took its first human life in Hong Kong in 1997 and has since rampaged west to Russia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. It remains almost exclusively a disease of birds, [Emphasis added – REL] but as the virus has spread, it has continued to mutate. It has developed greater lethality and enhanced environmental stability, and has begun taking more species under its wing. Influenza viruses don’t typically kill mammals like rodents, but experiments have shown that the latest H5N1 mutants can kill 100% of infected mice, practically dissolving their lungs. The scientific world has never seen anything like it. [This supports the bio-engineered origin of this virus – REL] We’re facing an unprecedented outbreak of an unpredictable virus….”

“Currently in humans, H5N1 is good at killing, but not at spreading. There are three essential conditions necessary to produce a pandemic. First, a new virus must arise from an animal reservoir, such that humans have no natural immunity to it. Second, the virus must evolve to be capable of killing human beings efficiently. Third, the virus must succeed in jumping efficiently from one human to the next. For the virus, it’s one small step to man, but one giant leap to mankind. So far, conditions one and two have been met in spades. Three strikes and we’re out. If the virus triggers a human pandemic, it will not be peasant farmers in Vietnam dying after handling dead birds or raw poultry—it will be New Yorkers, Parisians, Londoners, and people in every city, township, and village in the world dying after shaking someone’s hand, touching a doorknob, or simply inhaling in the wrong place at the wrong time….”

[While Dr. Greger does an admirable job of pulling information together, he does not critically analyze the statistical slight of hand which creates the panic perception of a disease which apparently has a very low mortality, despite what appear to be the best efforts of sophisticated scientists. -REL]

http://birdflubook.com/a.php?id=114

5. Lead In To Surrender of Choice for Personal Safety and Liberty Re: Pandemic Flu Beginning.

Arizona Daily Star, Tucson, AZ, September 14, 2008

“In global flu outbreak, who gets saved? “In the event of a global flu outbreak, some government leaders could have higher priority to receive vaccines than infants and toddlers…..The department, which has been preparing for the possibility of a massive pandemic flu outbreak for more than four years now, is adding a new component to its plan — input from the public… [What a novel departure! -REL]

If people understand what’s going on, there’s a bigger chance of buy-in, if and when if happens,” said Dr. Michelle McDonald, the department’s chief medical officer.

“There will be three major ethical issues — short supplies of critical things, restrictions of freedom (as) places will be closed [including your home as you are “detained” for quarantine or other purposes? – REL], and there will be personal and community interests to balance.” [Early justification for marshal law – REL]…. ‘Many people will be asked to make choices,’ McDonald said.

The worst pandemic flu in the last century was the 1918 “Spanish flu,” which infected between 30 and 40 percent of the population and resulted in more than a half-million deaths in the United States and between 20 million and 100 million deaths worldwide. [Which makes its intentional recreation highly puzzling -REL]

“Is there going to be another pandemic? Yeah, there is absolutely, no question,” said Dr. Bob England, director of the Maricopa County Health Department…. If it gets going, it’s going to go very fast. … But panic does not have to happen if you communicate well, tell the truth and give people something rational to do.”
http://www.azstarnet.com/me
tro/257459

6. Avian Flu Found in Togo, West Africa [Note that this item refers to the virus in birds, not in people, but it is written to sound like Avian Flu is among us humans now. Note the misuse of the word “deadly’ in the following headline. – REL]

Togo: Recent bird flu outbreak is deadly H5N1

LOME, Togo (AP) — Tests performed after the first ever outbreak of bird flu in the West African nation of Togo have confirmed the presence of the virulent H5N1 strain of the virus, state media said Monday.

The virus was detected at a poultry farm housing more than 4,500 birds in the village of Agbata outside the capital, Lome, according to the government.

The presence of the deadly strain raises special concern because it has the potential to infect humans. At least 235 people have died of bird flu worldwide since 2003, according to the World Health Organization.

However, the disease remains hard for humans to catch, with most cases linked to contact with infected birds. But scientists worry the virus could mutate to a form that spreads more easily among people.

Togo state television reported the lab tests were carried out by experts in Ghana and Italy after the outbreak was discovered last week.

The Health Ministry says “precautionary measures have been taken to contain the situation.” [Whatever that means -probably slaughtering backyard flocks and paying nothing, as in Nigeria, but paying above market value for industrial flocks which are killed. – REL]
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ijHXcssRTwpilkrwuURZECPGZ_bgD937G5500

Commercializing the Pandemic Opportunity [This is but a small sampling of the rush for profit by pharmaceutical companies and others to profit from the predicted, but not yet real, Pandeic Flu (or Pandemic anything else) hysteria.

The gold rush is on!

1. IntefleCSâ„¢ Bio Surveillance

A Pandemic Surveillance program called “IntefleCSâ„¢ Bio Surveillance has been designed for the early detection and effective management of an epidemic or pandemic outbreak of infectious disease. The solution steers consumers and clinicians successfully through the complex healthcare delivery process to ensure that patients are referred to the most appropriate level of care. [Whatever that might mean -REL]” Their website banner repeats the now-familiar harrangue, “No one knows what or when the next pandemic outbreak will be but healthcare services need to be fully prepared.” [The logical absurdity of this does not seem to bother either this company or those who repeat this illogical statement over and over. – REL]

http://www.csdss.com/solutions/bioSurveillance/index.aspx?gclid=COi_yq_p25UCFQGVGgodYlEyYw

2. Novavax Today Reported that it’s VLP Pandemic Influenza Vaccine, Joined With Innovative Vaccine Preparation, Pas the Potential to Address Aaps in Global Flu Pandemic Preparedness.

Novavax, Inc. (NASDAQ: NVAX) announced today favorable results from the second stage of the Phase I/IIa human clinical trial of its pandemic influenza virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine candidate. The vaccine, [produced in insect cell culture – REL] which does not contain an adjuvant, induced robust neutralizing antibody responses. Novavax’s VLP candidate is directed against the H5N1 A/Indonesia/05/2005 avian influenza strain. Avian influenza emerged in humans in Indonesia in 2005 and has caused 135 documented human cases, 81% of which have been fatal. [As previously discussed, the number of cases mentioned is the number of SYMPTOMATIC cases. Asymptomatic cases, those without any symptoms or mild ones, are totally ignored although there may be thousands of such cases for every one reported, altering the statistics profoundly. This precision would undermine the frantic, and profitable, “media reality” being created. -REL]….

[The point of this commercialization is presented at the end of this article – REL] “These data are also supportive for moving forward with development of another Novavax vaccine candidate: against seasonal influenza. Seasonal influenza causes over 500,000 deaths worldwide and over 36,000 deaths in the U.S. each year, most of which occur in adults 65 years of age and older, a population in which currently licensed vaccines have only modest efficacy.

Novavax has developed a vaccine candidate against seasonal (human) influenza strains. While current seasonal vaccines consist almost entirely of HA, the Novavax VLP contains HA, NA, and M1 with the potential of inducing neutralizing antibody to prevent infection and reduce the severity of influenza illnesses.”

http://www.emaxhealth.com/90/1/24265.html

3. New Drugs in the Offing – H5N1 Already Resistant to Current Ones
New drugs to fight bird flu, other influenza epidemics

Researchers at Rutgers University and The University of Texas at Austin have reported a discovery that could help scientists develop drugs to fight the much-feared bird flu and other virulent strains of influenza.

The researchers have determined the three-dimensional structure of a site on an influenza A virus protein that binds to one of its human protein targets, thereby suppressing a person’s natural defenses to the infection and paving the way for the virus to replicate efficiently. This so-called NS1 virus protein is shared by all influenza A viruses isolated from humans – including avian influenza, or bird flu, and the 1918 pandemic influenza virus….

“Our work uncovers an Achilles heel of influenza A viruses that cause human epidemics and high mortality pandemics,” said Montelione, professor of molecular biology and biochemistry. “We have identified the structure of a key target site for drugs that could be developed to effectively combat this disease.”

http://www.emaxhealth.com/90/1/24222.html

4. Self Immunize to Find Out if Avian Flu Vaccine Works [Or Might Kill You -REL], Suggests Anonymous Blogger,

“The newly introduced way to prevent avian infection is the bird flu vaccine. [This is factually incorrect – REL] Through years of experimentation, health experts have finally put a solution to our problems [This is factually incorrect. One of the largest studies of an Avian Flu vaccine ever reported is now in progress. St. Louis University has enrolled just 167 people in the trial. -REL]. Although it has been released with great certainty, how are we going to know if the vaccine works? How will we know if the new influenza virus vaccine promises immunity from avian flu contamination? Well, there can only be one way to find out and that is through self-immunization.” [This is bizarre reasoning -REL]

Is The Influenza Virus Vaccine Effective Against Bird Flu

“Among the many tests [What tests? -REL] conducted by several health agencies from all over the globe, the efficacy of the flu vaccine is said to be very successful. About eighty percent of the group tested showed positive results [Antibody production is NOT disease protection – REL]. Although it still needs to be tried and tested by many people, the influenza virus vaccine can probably be our great defense against the killer disease. [It is not a killer disease. It is billed as a killer disease. No one who is talking knows the real statistics: people infected vs. kill rate. All we have is the oft-repeated statistic of people seriously ill vs. kill rate. The difference is massively important. REL] Through this newly crafted ounce of fluid, we can remove our fears of getting infected with the deadly virus. [There is no way to create a vaccine against a virus that does not yet exist. IF the Pandemic Flu virus does not exist, there is no assurance whatsoever that these vaccines provide any measure of protection. Vaccines often cause the diseases they are supposed to protect against. What would the implications of such a chain of events be with the Pandemic Avian Flu? REL] Perhaps in a year’s time, we can know even more about the effectiveness of the vaccine.” [And perhaps not, perhaps with tragic consequences – REL]

5. Vaxin Gets Funding for Bird Flu Vaccine Experiments
Birmingham News, Birmingham Alabama 09/12/2008

Alabama-based biotech firm Vaxin has received a $995,000 grant from the NIH to conduct experiments on its genetically engineered bird-flu vaccine designed to inoculate in-ovo poultry populations. [This means that eggs used for human consumption would be vaccinated before they are consumed and that chickens hatched from these eggs would already be vaccinated. The health hazards of these process are not characterized or understood. A large percentage of the poultry consumed is already being inoculated with untested vaccines against various diseases including the supposedly dangerous Avian Flu. Please note that only vaccinated flocks develop Avian Flu. -REL] The company’s CEO says it could be possible to vaccinate “70,000 to 80,000 eggs an hour,” because the process can be automated. He also noted that the company is separately developing a human vaccine, and they’re preparing for human trials. Birmingham News (Ala.),
http://birdflubreakingnews.com/templates/birdflu/window.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smartbrief.com%2Fnews%2Faabb%2FstoryDetails.jsp%3Fissueid%3D59CD5B23-32D2-42EA-851D-E9E95F579F5B%26copyid%3D12DF01FC-0BBD-453C-ADC7-080F2649CD3D

And on it goes… But remember, we at Natural Solutions Foundation are here for you, to help you sort the hype from the threat. To continue to do so, we need your generous, tax-deductible support.

6. MRSA Vaccines under development for several years.

Nabi Biopharmaceuticals and NIAID to Advance PentaStaph Vaccine Research
Collaboration to Focus On Protecting Against Life-Threatening Staphylococcus aureus Infections

ROCKVILLE, Md., Sept. 9, 2008 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nabi Biopharmaceuticals (Nasdaq:NABI) announced today that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), one of the National Institutes of Health, has entered into a collaboration with Nabi to advance the Company’s promising PentaStaph(tm) vaccine candidate for the prevention and treatment of S. aureus infections in the community and hospital settings. The focus of the collaboration is to conduct pre-clinical toxicology evaluations of two new S. aureus antigens as components of the first-in-class, multivalent vaccine, targeting S. aureus infections. NIAID will fund the pre-clinical toxicology evaluations of the vaccine components manufactured and provided by Nabi. The two novel antigens are designed to protect against two of the most virulent and debilitating toxins produced by the bacteria: Panton-Valentine Leukocidin, found predominantly in community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and alpha toxin, produced by almost all S. aureus isolates. Pre-clinical toxicology testing of these components will help enable the initiation of Phase 1 clinical trials for these new antigens in early 2009 which is one of the Company’s three development milestones for 2008.

http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/nabi-biopharmaceuticals-and-niaid-advance-pentastaph-vaccine-research

Please give at: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189

Thank you!

Vaccine Failures Library: Selected References

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

Economic interests require strong confidence in vaccination since getting toxic jabs, as the British call them, is a hugely successful business which is justified only if vaccines are safe and work as advertised to prevent disease.

The belief system which most of us are raised with make such conclusions obvious and difficult to question. The reality, however, is grimly distinct from that comfortable set of assumptions.
Presented below is a very partial compendium of litaerature substantiating the conclusion that putting vaccines, whether inhaled or injected, into your body or that of a child is a grave matter which should be seriously considered before any such act is undertaken.

In fact, to my astonishment, since I started out believing that vaccines were both safe and effective, I now have concluded on the basis of information like that below that all vaccinations are so questionable and unnecessary as to prohibit their use in any circumstances I can think of.

Since there is a great deal of pro vaccine information circulating, I feel it is the responsibility of the Natural Solutions Foundation to make information like this available so that consumers, parents, physicians, nurses and other health-related decision makers can come to reasonable decisions.
This information may be freely circulated and copied provided that full citations are included.

My special thanks to http://www.whale.to/vaccines/failures.html.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org

Vaccine Failures: Having an antibody does not guarantee protection from infection.

NOTE: The medical journal, Vaccine, states, “It is known that, in many instances, antigen-specific antibody titers do not correlate with protection.” PMID: 11587808

NOTE: “The findings of efficacy studies have not demonstrated a direct correlation between antibody response and protection against pertussis disease. Antibody studies are useful to compare amount of response elicited by different vaccines under different conditions or in different groups. Thus, efficacy studies are required to measure clinical protection conferred by each pertussis vaccine. MMWR March 28, 1997/Vol.46/No. RR-7

Australia, July 28, 2007: Two of the five cases of bacterial meningitis were within the same family, the other three seem unrelated. Dr. Margot McLean, the Medical Officer of Health, reports that two of the children were completely immunized against meningococci while others ere partially vaccinated.

2007: Connecticut: State health experts are investigating an outbreak of chicken pox in Colchester. Sixty-five students at the Jack Jackter Elementary School got chicken pox last year. It was one of the largest outbreaks in the state. The chicken pox vaccine has a known 20-percent failure rate.

Oklahoma: February 20, 2006: Elgin ISD Experiencing Chicken Pox Outbreak. More than 40 kids were out of school today in Elgin after an outbreak of chicken pox. School officials at Elgin Independent School District say on Friday they had 61 cases of chicken pox and strangely, school records show most of the kids have already been immunized.

Wisconsin: Jan. 20, 2006: Health officials are looking into an outbreak of chickenpox in the Gale-Ettrick-Trempealeau School District in which all except two of the 44 affected children had been vaccinated against the illness.

Alabama: Dec. 15, 2005: Chickenpox outbreak zeroes in on school. Hazel Green kids discover vaccine is no guarantee.

Multistate Outbreak of Mumps — United States, January 1–May 2, 2006: In Iowa, preliminary vaccination data were reported through May 3, 2006. Among 1,192 patients, 94% were vaccinated, 141 (12%) had received 1 dose of MMR vaccine, and 607 (51%) had received 2 doses. The vaccination status of 375 (31%) patients, the majority of whom were adults who did not have vaccination records, was unknown.

Mumps outbreak, 2006: Report from Julie Gerberding: “In addition, although this is a very good vaccine, it is not perfect. About 10 percent of people who get both doses of the vaccine still remain [susceptible] to mumps. So if you are in a community of 10,000 people and 10 percent of the people who got both doses of the vaccine are susceptible, once you get a little outbreak going in that community, that means that up to 1,000 people in the community would actually come down with mumps even though they were properly immunized with what we know is a very good vaccine.”

Oregon: October 2001. Chickenpox Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated School Population. A chickenpox outbreak occurred in a school in which 97% of students without a prior history of chickenpox were vaccinated. Students vaccinated >5 years before the outbreak were at risk for breakthrough disease. PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 3 March 2004, pp. 455-459

1995: Between October 3 and November 23, 1990, clinical mumps developed in 54 students; 53 had been vaccinated. Cheek et al. “Mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated school population”. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 149: 774-778

1991 Tennessee: mumps outbreak, 99.6 percent of schoolchildren in Maury County, Tennessee met vaccination requirements for mumps.

1987: An outbreak of measles in secondary school with more than 99 percent vaccination rate and more than 95 percent of students have measles antibody (vaccine immunity.) Gustafson et al. “Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population”, NEJM; 3216: 771-774

1987: Nknowane BM et al. Measles outbreak in a vaccinated (70%) school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failure”: Am J Pub Health;77:434-438.1987

1972: Twenty-four cases of measles occurred in a school in which 89% of children were immunized or had had natural disease; 19 of these cases were vaccine failures. Cherry JD et al. “Urban measles in the vaccine era: a clinical, epidemiologic, and serologic study”. J Pediatrics; 81(2): 217- 230

Pertussis Infection in Fully Vaccinated Children in Day-Care Centers, Israel. (REF: Emerging Infectious Diseases Vol. 6, No. 5; Sep-Oct 2000)

Pertussis in the Highly Vaccinated Population, The Netherlands (REF: Emerging Infectious Diseases Vol. 6, No. 4 Jul-Aug 2000)

Pertussis in North-West Western Australia in 1999; All vaccinated. (REF: Communicable Diseases Intelligence 2000 Vol 24 No 12)

Measles epidemic occurred in Hungary during 1988-1989 despite over 93% of people born during 1970-1973 and over 98% born since 1973 had been vaccinated. Agocs et al.”The 1988-1999 measles epidemic in Hungary: assessment of vaccine failure”. International J Epidemiology; 21(5): 1007- 1013. 1992.

Mumps outbreak occurred in a group of vaccinated children aged 3-4 years in San Sebastian (Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain) in 2000

March 2006 Iowa mumps epidemic puzzles officials ‘Of the 245 patients this year, at least 66 percent had had the recommended two-shot vaccination, while 14 percent had received one dose, the Public Health Department said.

2002 Outbreak of Varicella at a Day-Care Center despite Vaccination
Quian JW.An outbreak of varicella despite vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1405-7;
author reply 1405-7. No abstract available. PMID: 12678027 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE

Wack RP. An outbreak of varicella despite vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1405-7; author reply 1405-7. No abstract available. PMID: 12678025 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE

Giusti RJ.An outbreak of varicella despite vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1405-7; author reply 1405-7. No abstract available. PMID: 12672872 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE

Manghani DK, et al. Pleomorphism of fine structure of rabies virus in human and experimental brain. J Neurol Sci. 1986 Sep;75(2):181-93. PMID: 3760910; UI: 87010723.
Identification of the Negri bodies in the brain of an 8-year-old boy who died 8 days after a paralytic illness and 20 days after a dog bite, and who had received 9 injections of Semple’s anti-rabies vaccine, provided evidence that he died of acute rabies encephalitis and not of post-vaccinal allergic encephalomyelitis. The Negri bodies in the human subject and those seen in the inoculated mouse differed in their morphological structure: the former consisted of a matrix of very fine granular material bearing larger granules or strands of higher electron-density resembling nucleic acids and representing products of host cell-virus interaction; and the latter showed better defined areas of granular matrix containing tubular, bullet-shaped and elongated forms of viral structures, and nucleocapsids or capsule-deficient cores, representing the virions, emerging from them. Fine structural examination of the patient’s brain and of the inoculated mouse has provided evidence of the pleomorphism of the Negri bodies and the various stages of formation of viral material and virions in them, the animal alone showing the mature virions of rabies, and proving the infectivity of the Negri bodies of the human brain.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=3760910&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b

“Reemergence of invasive haemophilus influenzae type b disease in a well-vaccinated population on remote Alaska” (Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 179, no. 1, January 1999, pp. 101-106, reported via Vaccine Weekly, NewsEdge Corporation news release, February 12, 1999):

In 1996, after administration of Hib conjugate vaccine (DTP whole-cell vaccine + Hib), cases ofinvasive Hib disease, as well as “silent” Hib infections, increased.

“High incidence of breakthrough varicella observed in healthy Japanese children immunized with live attenuated varicella vaccine (Oka strain),” Acta Paediatrica Japonica, vol. 39, no. 6, December 1997, pp. 663-8: the rate of varicella [chicken pox] occurrence among vaccinees was found to be much higher than rates reported previously by other authors. “Varicella vaccine seems to be effective in modifying the symptoms of varicella, but not potent enough in protecting from VZV infection.”

“The characteristics of poliovirus strains circulating in Ukraine in 1982-1994” (Mikrobiol[ogie] Z. vol. 60, no. 2, March-April 1998, pp. 44-49 [article in Russian]): “The long-term use of the live poliomyelitis vaccine has not stopped circulation of virulent polioviruses.”

“Is smallpox history?” (The Lancet, vol. 353, no. 9164, May 8, 1999): “A pilgrim returned home to Yugoslavia from Mecca in February, 1972, with a fever… In the 4 weeks since the pilgrim first had his fever, 150 people were infected across the country. It took 4 weeks before doctors, nurses, and health authorities knew they were dealing with smallpox… 175 people contracted smallpox [thereafter] and 35 died… these events occurred in a well-vaccinated population.”

“Five cases of measles secondary vaccine failure with confirmed seroconversion after live measles vaccination” (Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Disease vol. 29, no. 2, 1997, pp.187-90): Two, five, seven and twelve years after vaccination with further attenuated live measles vaccine, three of five patients experienced modified measles infection, and the remaining two had typical measles. “This may be the first SVF case report that confirms the existence of completely waning immunity in recipients of the further attenuated live measles vaccines.”

“H[epatitis] B V[irus] prevalence is unchanged by hepatitis B [vaccine],” report by Michael Belkin, statistician, based on nationwide sampling of the prevalence of hepatitis B by the Centers for Disease Control, 1988, to 1994, for comparison with figures from 1976 to 1980 [American Journal of Public Health, vol. 89, no. 14, 1999]: “There was an age-adjusted prevalence of 5.5% in the first study and 4.9% in the second; these differences are not statistically significant. The authors concluded that the widespread use of HBV vaccine in the 1980s has not had a major impact on the overall prevalence of this infection (communication posted on the Vaccine Information and Awareness (VIA) listserv [via@access1.net], March 11, 1999,.
Statistics:
The efficacy of common vaccines may be greatly exaggerated. In a 1998 study, it was stated that “investigator bias probably has overestimated the efficacy of most vaccines.” Clinicians’ compliance levels in monitoring illness in vaccine recipients varied widely in trial protocols. “Less compliant investigators were far more likely to report data making vaccines appear more effective against mild or moderate disease. Our data suggest that observer compliance (observer bias) can significantly inflate calculated vaccine efficacy…it is likely that all recently completed efficacy trials have been affected by this type of observer bias and all vaccines have considerably less efficacy against mild disease than published data suggest” (Pediatrics, vol. 102, no. 4, part 1, October 1998, pp. 909-912, reported as news release, “Clinical Trials; Vaccine Efficacy Overestimated…,” posted December 2 to Vaccine Information and Awareness electronic mail discussion list [via@access1.net], 9:42 a.m.).
Laskey AL, Johnson TR, Dagartzikas MI, Tobias JD. Endocarditis Attributable to Group A beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus After Uncomplicated Varicella in a Vaccinated Child.
Pediatrics. 2000 Sep;106(3):E40. [Record as supplied by publisher] PMID: 10969124

Roberts RJ, et al. Reasons for non-uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella catch up immunisation in a measles epidemic and side effects of the vaccine. BMJ. 1995 Jun 24;310(6995):1629-32. PMID: 7795447; UI: 95315783.
Many of the objections raised by parents could be overcome by emphasising that primary immunisation does not necessarily confer immunity and that diagnosis of measles is unreliable.
The Lancet, vol. 353, January 9, 1999, pp. 98-102—“Effect of subclinical infection on maintaining immunity against measles in vaccinated children in West Africa” : Subclinical measles occurred in 45 percent of vaccinated children exposed to natural measles. “new epidemics, albeit milder in form, may occur in vaccinated areas[, a fact] which should be recognised in campaigns to eradicate measles.” [Note: if sustained as chronic infections, subclinical measles infections can result in numerous other diseases.]

Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop., vol. 28, no. 4, Oct-Dec 1995, pp. 339-43 “Clinical and epidemiological findings during a measles outbreak occurring in a population with a high vaccination coverage” : “The history of previous vaccination [in very early childhood] did not diminish thenumber of complications of the cases studied. The results of this work show changes in age distribution of measles leading to sizeable outbreaks among teenagers and young adults.”

Clin. Invest. Med., vol. 11, no. 4, August 1988, pp. 304-9: “Measles serodiagnosis during an outbreak in a vaccinated community” ( from a group of 30 measles-sufferers displaying IgM antibodies during the acute phase of illness, 17 had been vaccinated for measles. All 17 experienced measles again, showing IgM antibodies indicating acute infection. “A history of prior vaccination is not always associated with immunity nor with the presence of specific antibodies.”

Aaby P, et al. (1990) Measles incidence, vaccine efficacy, and mortality in two urban African areas with high vaccination coverage. J Infect Dis. 1990 Nov;162(5):1043-8. PMID: 2230232; UI: 91037153.
Measles incidence, vaccine efficacy, and mortality were examined prospectively in two districts in Bissau where vaccine coverage for children aged 12-23 months was 81% (Bandim 1) and 61% (Bandim 2). There was little difference in cumulative measles incidence before 9 months of age (6.1% and 7.6%, respectively). Between 9 months and 2 years of age, however, 6.1% contracted measles in Bandim 1 and 13.7% in Bandim 2. Even adjusting for vaccination status, incidence was significantly higher in Bandim 2 (relative risk 1.6, P = .04). Even though 95% of the children had measles antibodies after vaccination, vaccine efficacy was not more than 68% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39%-84%) and was unrelated to age at vaccination. Unvaccinated children had a mortality hazard ratio of 3.0 compared with vaccinated children (P = .002), indicating a protective efficacy against death of 66% (CI 32%-83%) of measles vaccination. These data suggest that it will be necessary to vaccinate before age 9 months to control measles in hyperendemic urban African areas. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=2230232&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b

Boulianne N, et al.(1991) [Major measles epidemic in the region of Quebec despite a 99% vaccine coverage]. Can J Public Health. 1991 May-Jun;82(3):189-90. French. PMID: 1884314; UI: 91356447.
The 1989 measles outbreak in the province of Quebec has been largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage. In the Quebec City area (pop. 600,000) 1,363 confirmed cases of measles did occur. A case-control study conducted to evaluate risk factors for measles allowed us to estimate vaccination coverage. It was measured in classes where cases did occur during the outbreak. This population included 8,931 students aged 5 to 19 years old. The 563 cases and a random sample of two controls per case selected in the case’s class were kept for analysis. The vaccination coverage among cases was at least 84.5%. Vaccination coverage for the total population was 99.0%. Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=1884314&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b

Ceyhan M, et al. (1992) The evaluation of vaccination against measles at nine months of age (report of an epidemic). Turk J Pediatr. 1992 Jul-Sep;34(3):127-33. PMID: 1485379; UI: 93134677.
Sixteen measles cases were studied during an epidemic that broke out in Etimesgut district of Ankara. Eight of these children had never been vaccinated against measles while the remainder had been vaccinated at nine months of age. In the sera obtained during the course of the illness, anti-measles antibody was not detectable in six vaccinated children and in four unvaccinated children. Upon observing the siblings of the subjects, it was determined that one out of three who had not been vaccinated against measles and three out of seven who had been vaccinated at nine months of age contracted the disease within a month. However none of the siblings who had been vaccinated against measles at 15 months contracted the disease. In our cases, although vaccination at nine months of age could not prevent measles, it resulted in a milder form of the disease. It seems that measles vaccine administered to infants at around nine months of age does not prevent the occurrence of the disease in many children. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=1485379&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b

Cherry JD, (1973) Feigin RD, Shackelford PG, Hinthorn DR, Schmidt RR. A clinical and serologic study of 103 children with measles vaccine failure. J Pediatr 1973 May;82(5):802-8
Cherry et al. (1972) described an epidemic in St Loius Cityand County during 1970 & 1971, during which 130 children were hospitalised and 6 died. The attack rate was much higher in vaccinated than unvaccinated children.

“In the measles epidemic of 1984-1985 in Aukland, New Zealand (Hardy et al. 1986) 35% of all measles cases were vaccinated, 9% were unsure and 67% were unvaccinated. However the largest number of cases were in children one year old or less, below the age at which they would be vaccinated.”–Scheibner.

Coetzee N, et al. (1994) The 1992 measles epidemic in Cape Town–a changing epidemiological pattern. S Afr Med J. 1994 Mar;84(3):145-9. PMID: 7740350; UI: 95258851
Over the last 6 years there has been a decline in the incidence of measles in Cape Town. However, during August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised. The objectives of this study were to characterise the epidemic in Cape Town and to determine possible reasons for the outbreak. The investigation consisted of two components–a description of the epidemic and an investigation of an outbreak at one primary school. Results indicate that during the last 4 months of the year, 757 cases were notified in Cape Town, compared with 144 in the first 8 months. The epidemic affected mainly white and coloured children over 5 years of age (P < 0.001). In contrast, during the period before the epidemic most cases occurred in black children and in those aged less than 1 year (P < 0.001). There was no significant increase in hospitalised cases. Investigation of the outbreak at one school revealed that the attack rate was 7.6% (25/329 children). Immunisation coverage (at least one dose of any measles vaccine) was 91% and vaccine efficacy was estimated to be 79% (95% CI 55-90); it was highest for monovalent measles (100%) and lowest for measles-mumps-rubella (74%). The epidemiology of measles in Cape Town has thus changed as evinced in this epidemic, with an increase in the number of cases occurring in older, previously vaccinated children. The possible reasons for this include both primary and secondary vaccine failure. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=7740350&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Currier RW 2d, et al. (1972) Measles in previously vaccinated children. Evaluation of an outbreak. Am J Dis Child. 1972 Dec;124(6):854-7. No abstract available.PMID: 4639221; UI: 73055262. Davis RM, et al.(1987) A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep;126(3):438-49. PMID: 3618578; UI: 87295970. From January 4 to May 13, 1985, an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana and persisted for 12 generations of spread. A total of 114 cases occurred on the Blackfeet Indian reservation in northwest Montana. Of the 137 cases, 82 (59.9%) were in school-aged children (aged 5-19 years). Of the 114 cases on the reservation, 108 (94.7%) were classified as programmatically nonpreventable. A total of 64 (82.1%) of the 78 patients on the reservation who were born after 1956 and were above the recommended age at vaccination had a history of adequate measles vaccination. Additionally, an audit of immunization records at the schools in Browning, Montana, where most of the cases occurred, showed that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated. A retrospective cohort study in the Browning schools failed to identify age at vaccination or time since vaccination as significant risk factors for vaccine failure. Overall vaccine efficacy was 96.9% (95% confidence interval =89.5-98.2%). None of 80 Browning students who were vaccinated at less than 12 months of age and revaccinated at 15 months of age or older became infected. A case-control study showed a significant association between attendance at Browning basketball games and infection early in the outbreak. This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=3618578&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Edmonson MB, et al.(1990) Mild measles and secondary vaccine failure during a sustained outbreak in a highly vaccinated population. JAMA. 1990 May 9;263(18):2467-71. PMID: 2278542; UI: 90230400. A prolonged school-based outbreak of measles provided an opportunity to study "vaccine-modified" mild measles and secondary vaccine failure. Thirty-six (97%) of 37 unvaccinated patients had rash illnesses that met the Centers for Disease Control clinical case definition of measles, but 29 (15%) of 198 vaccinated patients did not, primarily because of low-grade or absent fever. Of 122 patients with seroconfirmed measles, 10 patients (all previously vaccinated) had no detectable measles-specific IgM and significantly milder illness than either vaccinated or unvaccinated patients with IgM-positive serum. Of 108 vaccinated patients with seroconfirmed measles, 17 patients (16%) had IgM-negative serology or rash illnesses that failed to meet the clinical case definition; their mean age (13 years), age at the time of vaccination, and time since vaccination did not differ from those of other vaccinated patients. The occurrence of secondary vaccine failure and vaccine-modified measles does not appear to be a major impediment to measles control in the United States but may lead to underreporting of measles cases and result in overestimation of vaccine efficacy in highly vaccinated populations. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=2278542&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Gustafson TL, (1987) Lievens AW, Brunell PA, Moellenberg RG, Buttery CM, Sehulster LM. Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population. N Engl J Med 1987 Mar 26;316(13):771-4 An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced. Serum samples from 1806 students at two secondary schools were obtained eight days after the onset of the first case. Only 4.1 percent of these students (74 of 1806) lacked detectable antibody to measles according to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and more than 99 percent had records of vaccination with live measles vaccine. Stratified analysis showed that the number of doses of vaccine received was the most important predictor of antibody response. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals of seronegative rates were 0 to 3.3 percent for students who had received two prior doses of vaccine, as compared with 3.6 to 6.8 percent for students who had received only a single dose. After the survey, none of the 1732 seropositive students contracted measles. Fourteen of 74 seronegative students, all of whom had been vaccinated, contracted measles. In addition, three seronegative students seroconverted without experiencing any symptoms. We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune. Rauth and Schmidt (1965). The authors followed 386 children who had received 3 doses of killed measles virus vaccine in 1961. Of these 386, 125 had been exposed to measles and 54 of them developed the disease. Barratta et al. (1970) investigated an outbreak of measles in Florida from Dec 1968-1969 and found there was little difference in the incidence of measles in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Herceg A, et al. An outbreak of measles in a highly immunised population: immunisation status and vaccine efficacy. Aust J Public Health. 1994 Sep;18(3):249-52. PMID: 7841251; UI: 95143332. All of the immunised cases had received measles-mumps vaccine. There was no increased risk of measles infection in those who had been immunised at under 15 months of age compared with those immunised at 15 months or older, or in those who could not provide a date of immunisation compared with those who could. None of the children who had received two doses of vaccine caught measles. Hersh BS, et al. 1991 A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement. Am J Public Health. 1991 Mar;81(3):360-4. PMID: 1994745; UI: 91135797. BACKGROUND. In early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity (physician diagnosed measles, receipt of live measles vaccine on or after the first birthday, or serologic evidence of immunity) due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. METHODS. To examine potential risk factors for measles vaccine failure, we conducted a retrospective cohort study among students living in campus dormitories using student health service vaccination records. RESULTS. Overall, 70 (83 percent) cases had been vaccinated at greater than or equal to 12 months of age. Students living in campus dormitories were at increased risk for measles compared to students living off-campus (RR = 3.0, 95% CI = 2.0, 4.7). Students vaccinated at 12-14 months of age were at increased risk compared to those vaccinated at greater than or equal to 15 months (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.7, 5.7). Time since vaccination was not a risk factor for vaccine failure. Measles vaccine effectiveness was calculated to be 94% (95% CI = 86, 98) for vaccination at greater than or equal to 15 months. CONCLUSIONS. As in secondary schools, measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations. Implementation of recent recommendations to require two doses of measles vaccinefor college entrants should help reduce measles outbreaks in college populations. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=1994745&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Hull HF, et al. (1985) Risk factors for measles vaccine failure among immunized students. Pediatrics. 1985 Oct;76(4):518-23. PMID: 4047794; UI: 86015842. An outbreak of measles occurred in a municipal school system which had reported 98% of students immunized against measles. A case-control study was conducted to determine reasons for vaccine failure. Vaccine failure was associated with immunizations that could not be documented in the provider's records. Among children with provider-documented immunization, vaccine failure was associated with vaccination at 12 to 14 months of age with an odds ratio of 4.73. Among children vaccinated at 15 months or older, vaccine failure was not associated with time elapsed since vaccination. Studies should be conducted to determine whether unreliable immunization records are a more widespread problem. Further consideration should be given to routine revaccination of children previously vaccinated at 12 to 14 months of age. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=4047794&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Judelsohn RG, et al. (1980) School-based measles outbreaks: correlation of age at immunization with risk of disease. Am J Public Health. 1980 Nov;70(11):1162-5. PMID: 7425187; UI: 81037187. During the Spring of 1978, students with a history of previous measles vaccination accounted for over three-forths of 203 cases of measles in a metropolitan county. Seventy cases occurred in two schools where 99% of the students were vaccinated. We analyzed countywide data to determine past patterns of measles vaccination, including outbreak control and vaccination update clinics. We also examined records of children from the two schools to assess the relationship between disease incidence and age at vaccination. When susceptibility was determined by trained health workers rather than by parents, fewer doses of measles vaccine were estimated to be needed. The majority of cases occurred among children 5 to 9 years old. Attack rates were higher for children vaccinated at 12 months of age or younger than for those vaccinated at 13 months of age or older. There were no significant differences in attack rates among children vaccinated at 13 months of age or older. These findings support recommendations for delaying routine measles vaccination until after 12 months of age and suggest that, during outbreaks, all children vaccinated prior to 13 months of age be revaccinated. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=7425187&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Kawamoto A, et al. (1995) Two independent outbreaks of measles in partially vaccinated junior high schools in Tottori, Japan. Arch Virol. 1995;140(2):349-54. PMID: 7710360; UI: 95225752. We analyzed retrospectively a relative risk of measles attacks in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated students using two independent outbreaks in Japan. The first involved 33/328 (10%) students where 64% students and 30% measles cases had been vaccinated. The second involved 27/241 (11%) students where 81% students and 48% measles cases had been vaccinated. The attack rates of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated students were significantly low (p < 0.001), but they accounted 25% in both episodes. The statistically significant clinical features among vaccinated and unvaccinated cases included the average duration of fever, 5.16 +/- 1.71 vs. 6.67 +/- 2.19 days (p = 0.01) and the incidence of complications, 0 vs. 25%, respectively. These results suggested that the measles in vaccinated cases were mostly due to secondary failures. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=7710360&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Krause PJ, et al (1979) . Epidemic measles in young adults. Clinical, epidemiologic, and serologic studies. Ann Intern Med. 1979 Jun;90(6):873-6. PMID: 443682; UI: 79185850. An outbreak of measles at the University of California at Los Angeles provided the opportunity to study clinical, epidemiologic, and serologic characteristics of the disease in young adults in the present vaccine era. Of the 34 cases studied, 18 occurred in persons who thought they were immune. Fifteen of 19 seronegative students vaccinated during the epidemic responded with a secondary (IgG) antibody response. Antibody prevalence studies indicated that 91% of the student population had measles antibody at the onset of the outbreak, and history relating to measles correlated poorly with antibody prevalence. Of 212 adults vaccinated, 58% complained of one or more symptoms. Seventeen percent were confined to bed, and in three women vaccine-associated illness was notably severe. That measles will continue to be a problem in adults with our present national approach to immunization is predicted. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=443682&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Landrigan PJ (1973) , Griesbach PH. IMJ Ill Med J 1973 Apr;141(4):367-72. Measles in previously vaccinated children in Illinois. PMID: 4148345, UI: 74041503 Leeb A. Measles vaccination failure--cause for concern? Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Mar;21(3):297-301, 304. PMID: 1605769; UI: 92296993. The author describes a propagated epidemic of measles virus infection on the north-west coast of Tasmania. Almost 20 per cent of children between the ages of 1 year and 15 years contracted the illness, 45 per cent of whom were previously vaccinated. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the incidence of infection and the vaccination status of the community and to investigate the apparent measles vaccine failure. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=1605769&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Markvart K, et al. [Explosive occurrence of measles in a vaccinated population]. Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 1977 Jan;26(1):15-24. Czech. No abstract available.PMID: 140009; UI: 77160099. Maulitz RM, et al. (1997) A measles outbreak in a New England community. Perspectives. Am J Dis Child. 1977 Jan;131(1):57-9. PMID: 835522; UI: 77108959. Between May 30 and June 29, 1974, 28 cases of measles occurred in schoolchildren in a residential New England community. The index patient probably contracted the disease on a school field trip 11 days before the onset of her illness. Of the other 27 cases, 15 had received live measles vaccine before age 1, and ten had no history of vaccination or disease. Four documented vaccine failures did occur in children vaccinated after age 1, but this was not an unusual number compared with the total number of vaccinees evaluated during the investigation. Control measures for susceptible persons including vaccination or modifying doses of immune serum globulin for exposure occurring more than 24 hours earlier. No additional cases of measles were reported for one month after the epidemic. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=835522&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Nkowane BM, et al (1987) . Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures. Am J Public Health. 1987 Apr;77(4):434-8. PMID: 3826461; UI: 87154064. An outbreak of measles occurred in a high school with a documented vaccination level of 98 per cent. Nineteen (70 per cent) of the cases were students who had histories of measles vaccination at 12 months of age or older and are therefore considered vaccine failures. Persons who were unimmunized or immunized at less than 12 months of age had substantially higher attack rates compared to those immunized on or after 12 months of age. Vaccine failures among apparently adequately vaccinated individuals were sources of infection for at least 48 per cent of the cases in the outbreak. There was no evidence to suggest that waning immunity was a contributing factor among the vaccine failures. Close contact with cases of measles in the high school, source or provider of vaccine, sharing common activities or classes with cases, and verification of the vaccination history were not significant risk factors in the outbreak. The outbreak subsided spontaneously after four generations of illness in the school and demonstrates that when measles is introduced in a highly vaccinated population, vaccine failures may play some role in transmission but that such transmission is not usually sustained. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=3826461&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Oguz F, et al. (1995) Analysis of measles cases in a university pediatric hospital during 1988 and 1993 outbreaks. Turk J Pediatr. 1995 Apr-Jun;37(2):83-92. PMID: 7597773; UI: 95320940. In Turkey, a mass measles immunization campaign was initiated in 1985, and the decision was made to administer the first of the measles vaccinations at nine months of age instead of 12-15 months. Following the campaign there was a decrease in the number of measles cases seen in the Outpatient Department of Istanbul University Children's Hospital in 1986 and 1987; however, after 1987 an increase was observed in measles cases, which continued until 1993. In order to investigate the current measles epidemics, we reevaluated the measles cases seen in our Outpatient Department from 1986 to 1993. We also investigated the vaccination status and the hospitalization and mortality rates of measles cases in the epidemics of 1988 and 1993. Since 1988 (except 1989) a significant increase (412-1375 percent) has been observed in measles cases, and between 1986 and 1993 more than half of all measles cases were in children older than four years of age. In 1988 and 1993 we found that most vaccinated measles cases were also in this age group, but the rate of complications and hospitalization among the vaccinated cases was lower compared to those who were not vaccinated. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=7597773&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Paunio M (1998) , Peltola H, Valle M, Davidkin I, Virtanen M, Heinonen OP. Am J Epidemiol 1998 Dec 1;148(11):1103-10 Explosive school-based measles outbreak: intense exposure may have resulted in high risk, even among revaccinees. Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Finland. Even high levels of measles vaccination coverage have not always prevented outbreaks of measles spread by airborne transmission. It has been suggested that a large inoculum might increase vaccine failure risk. Airbome transmission might occasionally entail a large measles inoculum. The epidemiologic relevance of measles among properly vaccinated persons (i.e., those vaccinated after 15 months of age and with live attenuated virus) is increased when they become contagious. The authors studied inoculum intensities as measured by proxy variables and the contagiousness of properly vaccinated persons who contracted measles among 51 measles patients infected in one school, at home, or elsewhere, utilizing preexisting records of measles cases and 214 healthy controls from an explosive school outbreak that occurred in a rural Finnish municipality in 1989. One "super-spreader" infected 22 others in one day, including eight once-vaccinated students and one twice-vaccinated student, probably during an assembly of 144 students in a poorly ventilated hallway with no sunlight. Those infected later athome had high measles risk, even if they were revaccinees. When siblings shared a bedroom with a measles case, a 78 percent risk (seven out of nine children) was observed among vaccinees. Vaccinees had approximately 2 days' shorter incubation timethan unvaccinated persons. Vaccinated and unvaccinated students were equally able to infect their siblings. Total protectionagainst measles might not be achievable, even among revaccinees, when children are confronted with intense exposure to measles virus. Rawls WE, et al. (1975) Analysis of a measles epidemic; possible role of vaccine failures. Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Nov 22;113(10):941-4. PMID: 1192310; UI: 76063956. A measles epidemic occurred in the Greensville (Ont.) Unit schools during January and February 1975. There were 47 cases of measles in 403 students: 26 (55%) of the children had a history of being vaccinated and 18 (38%) had not been vaccinated. Among children known to have been vaccinated at less than 1 year of age 7 of 13 contracted measles, while among the 48 children who had not been vaccinated 18 contracted measles. The attack rate among vaccinees increased with increasing time since vaccination. The observations of this study as well as those of similar studies suggest that vaccine failures contributed to the genesis of the epidemic. It is recommended that all children initially vaccinated at less than 1 year of age should be revaccinated with live attenuated measles virus vaccine. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=1192310&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Shasby DM, et al. (1977) Epidemic measles in a highly vaccinated population. N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 17;296(11):585-9. PMID: 65732; UI: 77123672. During November, 1975, to May, 1976, measles occurred at a rate of 20.3 cases per 1000 in a purported immunized population, of whom historical and serologic survey revealed that 9 per cent had no history of either measles illness or vaccination and 18 per cent did not have detectable measles antibody. Antibody was detectable in 92 per cent of those vaccinated at greater than or equal to 13 months, 80 per cent at 12 months and 67 per cent of those vaccinated when less than one year old (P less than 0.001), but no significant differences existed with increasing years since vaccination (P greater than 0.1). A second vaccination increased detectable antibody prevalence only in those originally vaccinated when less than nine months old (42 to 80 per cent, P less than 0.02). During a measles outbreak, more cases occurred in those receiving vaccine when less than 12 months old than in those vaccinated at greater than or equal to 12 months (37 per cent vs. 9 per cent, P less than 0.001). A second vaccination protected those originally vaccinated at less than 12 months (35 per cent ill without a second vaccination vs. 2 per cent with, P less than 0.001). Thus, a single measles vaccination of children less than 12 months old does not protect; a second vaccination will protect this group. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=65732&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Sutcliffe PA, et al. (1996) Outbreak of measles in a highly vaccinated secondary school population. CMAJ. 1996 Nov 15;155(10):1407-13. PMID: 8943928; UI: 97099351. OBJECTIVE: To examine the factors associated with measles vaccine effectiveness and the effect of two doses of vaccine on measles susceptibility during an outbreak. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A secondary school in the City of Toronto. SUBJECTS: The entire school population (1135 students 14 to 21 years of age). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of measles during an outbreak associated with age at first measles vaccination, length of time since vaccination, vaccination before 1980 and whether date of vaccination was estimated; vaccine efficacy of one dose versus two doses. RESULTS: Eighty-seven laboratory-confirmed or clinically confirmed cases of measles were identified (for an attack rate of 7.7%). The measles vaccination rate was 94.2%, and 10% of the students had received two doses of measles vaccine before the outbreak. Among those who had received only one dose of vaccine, vaccination at less than 15 months of age was associated with vaccine failure (relative risk 3.62, 95% confidence interval 2.32 to 5.66). There was no increased risk of vaccine failure associated with length of time since vaccination once the relative risk was adjusted for age at vaccination in a stratified analysis. Vaccination before 1980 and an estimated date of vaccination were not associated with increased risk of vaccine failure. Administration of a second dose of vaccine during the outbreak was not protective. Two doses of vaccine given before the outbreak conferred significant protection, and the relative risk of failure after one dose versus two doses was 5.0 (95% confidence interval 1.25 to 20.15). Of the 87 cases, 76 (87%) could have been prevented had all the students received two doses of measles vaccine before the outbreak, with the first at 12 months of age or later. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed primary measles vaccination (at 15 months of age or later) significantly reduced measles risk at later ages. However, revising the timing of the current 12-month dose would leave children vulnerable during a period in which there is increased risk of complications. The findings support a population-based two-dose measles vaccination strategy for optimal measles control and eventual disease elimination. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=8943928&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Slater PE, et al. (1992-3) The 1991 measles epidemic in Israel. Public Health Rev. 1992-93;20(1-2):41-51. PMID: 1305976; UI: 93303282. INTRODUCTION AND METHODS. Prior to the institution of universal childhood vaccination against measles in Israel in 1967, large outbreaks occurred in epidemic cycles at intervals of 2-4 years. The mean annual incidence in the pre-vaccination period, 1950-66, was 470/100,000 per year. With the institution of routine measles vaccination, incidence rates fell, and since 1970 measles incidence has averaged less than one-tenth the pre-vaccination incidence rate, although epidemics occurred in 1975, 1982, 1984-85, and 1991. In this report, based upon cases of measles reported to and investigated by the Ministry of Health, we present an analysis of the 1991 measles epidemic, the measures taken to contain it, and an overview of the prospects for measles control in Israel in the future. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS. The 1991 measles epidemic, 1036 reported cases (incidence: 20.0/100,000), began in the south of the country among underimmunized Beduin children and spread to the Jewish population in the south and then to the rest of the country. The highest incidence was in children aged 12-23 months, followed by children less than 12 months of age and children aged 2-4 years. In the main, cases occurred in persons never immunized in the past, but in 37% of cases vaccine failure seems to have occurred. Control measures included mass vaccination of children in the south and lowering the age for routine measles vaccination nationwide to 12 months. Despite very substantial gains towards measles control in Israel, elimination of the disease is not a realistic goal, mainly because the transmission potential of the disease is too high and vaccine coverage and efficacy are not high enough. Trends in measles incidence over the last four decades allow a cautious optimism that measles containment can be achieved. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=1305976&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Srirajalingam M, et al (1998). Estimation of measles vaccination coverage and longer-term vaccine efficacy in a Queensland State High School during the 1993-94 measles epidemic. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Dec;22(7):792-5. PMID: 9889445; UI: 99106119. The parents of 470 students randomly selected from 1321 students attending a state high school were surveyed during the 1993-94 measles epidemic, by means of a take-home questionnaire. The response rate was 87%. Thirty stated that their child had measles during this epidemic; nine of these 30 gave a history of previous vaccination. Overall, 312 of the 470 (76%) stated that their child had been vaccinated, but only 34% indicated that they had vaccination records. There were no measles cases during this epidemic in the group with records. Those not vaccinated were at 10 times increased risk of contracting measles compared to those who had been vaccinated with or without records. Vaccine efficacy estimated in general a decade after vaccination based on parental recall of vaccination status regardless of whether they had vaccination records or not was 91% (95% CI 80%-96%). This calculation excluded 123 who claimed to have had measles prior to 1993 and 30 uncertain of their vaccination status. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=9889445&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Shelton JD, et al. (1978) Measles vaccine efficacy: influence of age at vaccination vs. duration of time since vaccination. Pediatrics. 1978 Dec;62(6):961-4. PMID: 733424; UI: 79095275. To evaluate the recent decision of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice to increase the recommended age for initial measles vaccination from 12 to 15 months, we carried out a case control study of vaccine failure in a recent measles epidemic. Compared to children vaccinated at ages 15 months or older, we found an increased risk of vaccine failure among those vaccinated at 12 to 14 months (relative risk = 19.2, 95% confidence interval = 4.6 to 80.1). In order to sort out the influence of age at vaccination from elapsed time since vaccination, we subjected the data to discriminant analysis. Age at vaccination subsumed all of the effect of duration of time since vaccination. Thus, we find no evidence of waning immunity over time. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=733424&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Sekla L, et al. (1988) An evaluation of measles serodiagnosis during an outbreak in a vaccinated community. Clin Invest Med. 1988 Aug;11(4):304-9. PMID: 3168353; UI: 89003844. During an epidemic of measles in a vaccinated community, five serodiagnostic tests were performed on 67 persons on whom clinical and epidemiological data were available. The test found most suitable for a rapid diagnosis of measles infection was an Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay for the detection of specific IgM antibodies. Only one false negative IgM was recorded. In a group of 45 persons who fulfilled the clinical definition of measles, specific IgM antibodies were detected in the acute phase serum of only 30 (66.6%), of whom 17 were vaccinated. When the convalescent sera were tested, specific IgM antibodies were detected in 25 of the 28 (89.2%) vaccinated, and in 17 of the 17 (100%) non vaccinated clinical cases. A convalescent blood should be tested in persons with a rash illness and no IgM antibodies in the acute phase serum. There were individual variations in the time of appearance of IgM. On the day of onset of rash, IgM antibodies were detected in 7 of the 12 (58.3%). A history of prior vaccination is not always associated with immunity nor with the presence of specific antibodies. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=3168353&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Sanchez Y, et al. (1977) [What is wrong with the measles vaccine in Mexico? Study of an epidemic outbrake of measles]. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1977 Mar-Apr;34(2):291-7. Spanish. PMID: 843401; UI: 77134326. The study included 205 children with measles seen after an epidemic outbreak in Distrito Federal during the first six months of 1976. 65.8% of the cases had not been given specific immunization and out of the 70 vaccinated cases (34.2%), one half of them were under one year old and were not given re-enforcement afterwards. The clinical picture suffered no changes in vaccinated children, 40% of infants showed initial exanthema on chest and abdomen with centrifugal distribution and in 41.5% of them, diarrhea appeared during the prodromal period. The most outstanding elements of this epidemic outbreak were the high number of sensible cases and the high percentage of children vaccinated before the age of one year and who were not later given re-vaccination. Indequate handling of the vaccine or combination of vaccine withe gammaglobulin used in 1969 and 1970, are also mentioned as a possibility to explain failures of the vaccine in ths group of well vaccinated children. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=843401&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Serra I, et al. (1990) [Measles in Chile]. Rev Med Chil. 1990 Feb;118(2):214-24. Spanish. PMID: 2152725; UI: 93303425. Outbreaks of measles have occurred in Chile in 1979, 1985 and 1988. A greater proportion of cases affected babies under 1 year of age and patients above age 14. However, the increase in mortality was small. Low quality of the vaccine and deficiencies in the vaccination programs may be implicated in these epidemics. Use of high quality vaccines, vaccination programs based on serological information and better epidemiologic surveillance are proposed to prevent new outbreaks of the disease http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=2152725&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Tayil SE, et al. (1998) Sero-epidemiological study of measles after 15 years of compulsory vaccination in Alexandria, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 1998 Dec;4(3):437-47. [MEDLINE record in process] PMID: 10415952; UI: 99344441. Cases of measles among 165 vaccinated and unvaccinated children were studied and the level of measles antibody in 230 previously vaccinated children was determined. Associations between demographic factors and immunological response to vaccination were also investigated. Approximately 80% of the children with measles had been vaccinated; their cases had significantly lower rates of complication. Rural areas accounted for significantly higher numbers of unvaccinated cases. Vaccination status did not correspond to place of exposure, duration of prodrome or accuracy of preliminary diagnosis. The seropositivity rate among vaccinated children was 86.1% with no significant variation with age. We recommend a second dose of measles vaccine and maintaining high vaccine coverage. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=10415952&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Tohani VK, et al. (1992) Vaccine efficacy in a measles immunisation programme. Bur. 1992 Apr 24;2(5):R59-60. PMID: 1285105; UI: 94035478. During a measles outbreak in Northern Ireland (between October 1988 and March 1989) it was noted that a proportion of cases had occurred in children who had previously been vaccinated against measles. A study was, therefore, set up to provide a rapid estimate of vaccine efficacy. Vaccine efficacy was calculated to be 94% (95% confidence limits, 91% to 96%). Investigation of the computerised records at 31 December 1991 revealed that 94% of children in the study cohort had received measles vaccine. As vaccination coverage increases, a higher proportion of cases of measles will, inevitably, have a history of vaccination. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=1285105&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b Trier H, et al. [Duration of immunity and occurrence of secondary vaccine failure following vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1992 Jul 13;154(29):2008-13. Review. Danish. PMID: 1509566; UI: 92376936. van Eijndhoven MJ, et al. (1994) [A measles epidemic in an adequately vaccinated middle school population]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Nov 26;138(48):2396-400. Dutch. PMID: 7990987; UI: 95082975. OBJECTIVE. To assess the extent of a measles epidemic in a secondary school. DESIGN. Retrospective and questionnaire investigation. SETTING. Secondary school, Bilthoven. METHOD. Questionnaire followed by laboratory testing for measles and other infectious diseases with exanthema. RESULTS. The response rate was 99% (935/949 pupils, aged 12-21 years, vaccination rate 92%). Seventy-seven students underwent laboratory investigations. Measles virus was isolated in 2 suspected patients. Thirty-three of 37 patients with clinical or laboratory criteria of measles had been vaccinated. Complications of measles were not detected. Infection was also detected in patients with relatively few or atypical symptoms. The protective efficacy of measles vaccine could be determined because the attack rate of the school population was less than 5%. CONCLUSION. Primary failure of the measles vaccine might be the cause of the minor epidemic but the results do not cast doubt on the efficacy of the current measles vaccination programme. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=7990987&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b MMWR Measles -- Hawaii Vol 33, No 50;702 12/21/1984 Of the 106 cases, 48 (45%) were considered preventable. Thirty-two of these patients had no record of measles vaccination or prior physician-diagnosed natural disease, and 16 had been vaccinated at under 12 months of age. Thirty-six of the 58 nonpreventable cases (62%) occurred among children 15 months of age or younger, most of whom were too young for routine vaccination. Eighteen (31%) of the nonpreventable cases had been immunized appropriately. The remaining four measles patients were 28 years of age or older--too old for routine vaccination. Of the 45 school-aged patients, 16 (35%) were vaccinated at 12 months of age or under; 12 (27%) were unvaccinated. Thus, non-immune schoolchildren accounted for 58% (28/48) of all preventable measles cases. http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000455.htm MMWR Measles in an Immunized School-Aged Population -- New Mexico Vol 34, No 04;052 02/01/1985. The school system reported that 98% of students were vaccinated against measles before the outbreak began.. http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000476.htm MMWR Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students -- Illinois Vol 33, No 24;349 06/22/1984 The outbreak involved 16 high school students, all of whom had histories of measles vaccination after 15 months of age documented in their school health records http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm Hess U. [Mumps vaccines: vaccination failures from an immunological viewpoint]. Soz Praventivmed. 1995;40(2):110-5. German. PMID: 7747520; UI: 95266359. Strehle A; (1997) Eggenberger K; Steiner CA; Matter L; Germann D. Mumps epidemic in vaccinated children in West Switzerland. Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 1997 Jun, 127:26, 1124-33 Since 1991, 6 years after the recommendation of universal childhood vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR triple vaccine), Switzerland is confronted with a large number of mumps cases affecting both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Up to 80% of the children suffering from mumps between 1991 and 1995 had previously been vaccinated, the majority with the Rubini vaccine strain. K T Goh. Lancet Volume 354, Number 9187 16 October 1999. Resurgence of mumps in Singapore caused by the Rubini mumps virus vaccine strain The measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine containing the highly attenuated Rubini mumps virus strain conferred no protection against acute parotitis in vaccinated children in Singapore. Its introduction into the national childhood immunisation programme has resulted in a reduction in the seroprevalence of mumps to prevaccination levels. Vaccination of 12-month-old children against mumps with the trivalent measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine was introduced into the national childhood immunisation programme in Singapore in January, 1990. The vaccination coverage for children younger than 2 years ranged from 84�4% in 1990 to 92% in 1998. A "catch-up" measles vaccination programme for children aged 12-18 years used the MMR vaccine from July to November, 1997, to curb the resurgence of measles, and a second dose of MMR vaccine was routinely given to all primary school leavers (11 years) from January, 1998. Since January, 1990, three mumps-virus vaccine strains have been used in the MMR vaccine. These are the Urabe strain, the Jeryl-Lynn strain, and the Rubini strain. The Urabe strain was withdrawn in 1992 after an association with increased risk of aseptic meningitis was reported in other countries.1 The Urabe strain was substituted by the Rubini strain during 1993-95. Disease surveillance showed that although the incidence of measles and rubella has declined, that of mumps has increased, from 674 cases in 1997 to 1183 cases in 1998, and to 2586 cases for the first 7 months of 1999. At the current rate of increase, the incidence is likely to reach 200 per 100 000 population by the end of the year. The increase in the incidence of mumps was mainly seen in children younger than 15 years, which constituted 61% of the cases. Of 592 cases investigated for vaccination history during the last 4 months of 1998, 258 (43, 6%) had documented evidence of immunisation with the MMR vaccine. All the vaccinated cases received one dose--the majority (85, 3%) at government polyclinics. Of 195 cases who were known to have received mumps-virus vaccine strains, 144 (73, 8%) were vaccinated with the Rubini strain, 42 (21, 5%) with the Jeryl-Lynn strain, and nine (4, 6%) with the Urabe strain. About three-quarters of the cases received their MMR vaccine 1-4 years before onset of illness. Epidemiological investigations pointed to primary vaccine failure as the most likely cause for the resurgence of mumps. The short interval between vaccination and onset of illness indicated that secondary vaccine failure due to waning immunity is unlikely. Misdiagnosis by physicians could not have contributed to the sharp increase, since the clinical signs and symptoms of mumps are quite typical, and acute parotitis caused by other infections is uncommon. To calculate the vaccine efficacy of the Rubini strain vaccine, epidemiological investigations were carried out in five child-care centres in which mumps outbreaks had occurred. Of 2418 children, 2107 had documented evidence of mumps vaccination, and 197 had no documented evidence. The vaccination status of 114 children was unknown. There were 184 cases of mumps in these five child-care centres; 166 in the vaccinated group and 24 in the unvaccinated group. The attack rate was 166 of 2107 (7, 9%) in the vaccinated group, and 18 of 197 (9, 1%) in the unvaccinated group. Of those with documented evidence of vaccination, 140 of 1546 children vaccinated with the Rubini strain vaccine developed mumps, giving an attack rate of 9, 1%. Thus the Rubini strain vaccine conferred no protection. Further confirmation of the low efficacy of the Rubini strain was obtained from the results of periodic national seroepidemiological surveys on vaccine-preventable diseases. Serum samples were tested by ELISA for mumps virus IgG antibody with a commercial test kit (Mumps ELISA II, BioWhittaker, USA) at the Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital. The seroprevalence of mumps in children less than 5 years of age was 22% in 1989, before the introduction of the MMR vaccine. It increased to 72, 4% in 1993 after mumps vaccination (with the Urabe strain and Jeryl-Lynn strain) was introduced. In 1998, the seroprevalence of mumps again fell to 25, 6%. In view of the low protection conferred by the Rubini strain vaccine, the Ministry of Health deregistered the MMR vaccine containing this particular strain in May 1999. The low clinical protection provided by the highly attenuated Rubini strain was first noted in Switzerland, Italy, and Portugal.2-4 Sharp increases in mumps incidence in the 1990s prompted the Swiss Federal Office for Public Health to recommend the use of MMR vaccines containing other mumps virus strains.2 Countries currently using the Rubini strain should monitor the incidence of mumps closely. If the incidence has not declined despite high immunisation coverage, the possibility of primary vaccine failure should be investigated. 1 Furesz J, Contreras G. Vaccine-related mumps meningitis--Canada. Can Dis Wkly Rep 1990; 16: 253-54. 2 Galazka AM, Robertson SE, Kraigher A. Mumps and mumps vaccine: a global review. Bull World Health Organ 1999; 77: 3-14. 3 Toscani L, Batou M, Bouvier P, Schlanepfer A. Comparison of the efficacy of various strains of mumps vaccine: a school survey. Soz Praventivmed 1996; 41: 341-47. 4 Germann D, Strohle A, Eggenberger K, Steiner CA, Matter I. An outbreak of mumps in a population partially vaccinated with the Rubini strain. Scand J Infect Dis 1996; 28: 235-38. Institute of Environmental Epidemiology, Ministry of the Environment, Environment Building 40, Singapore 228231, Singapore (K T Goh MD) (e-mail: goh_kee_tai@env.gov.sg) Rubella "The incidence of rubella virus infections in Switzerland after the introduction of the MMR mass vaccination programme" (European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 11, no. 3, June 1995, pp. 305-10): In evaluating the impact of the MMR mass vaccination program begun in Switzerland in 1985, "we conclude that MMR mass vaccination has not interrupted the circulation of rubella virus in Switzerland, and that improvements in the implementation and surveillance of the MMR vaccinationcampaign are necessary in order to avoid [the] untoward effects of it."

Weaponized Avian Flu: Current Intelligence Estimate of Situation.2.1

Sunday, August 17th, 2008

Weaponized Avian Flu Intelligence Update
As of August 15, 2008
(Revised 08.24.08)

Index:
Current Updates
Disclaimer
Many More Dots…
Resources

August 21, 2008: Internet Abuzz Media Release: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/08/prweb1227944.htm
Previous Update: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=755
Original WAF Warning: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=742

Current Update Summary:

1. Even when the news is non existent or nonsensical, the drum beat continues to keep Avian Flu in front of everyone who reads, watches or listens to the news.

2. Multiple strains of Avian Flu are being created and “identified”

3. Avian Flu vaccines are being readied in the US even though, assuming that such a vaccine would, in fact, be protective and effective, they would be ineffective against any Avian Flu strains except the one they were prepared from

4. Avian Flu vaccines might well be used to spread, rather than to prevent against the disease.

5. The full contents of Avian Flu vaccines is unknown to us at this time but we do know that the Sanofi-Pasteur version, due in the US in August, 2008, was produced using human kidney cells allowing the hemagglutinin receptors to become “educated” on how to invade human cells.

6. UK health official note that although they have purchased 3.3 million vaccine doses, the protection they offer is unknown at best since until the pandemic flu has been identified, there can be no vaccine and that creating it after that point will take 4-6 months at the least. Therefore, the entire US story about being able to vaccinate “every man, woman and child against the pandemic Avian Flu” is shown to be totally flawed and nonsensical.

7. If the currently predicted “inevitable Avian Flu Pandemic” were not a weaponized version of the recently resurrected 1918 pandemic flu, why would the media suddenly start touting the idea that survivors of the 1918 pandemic are still producing antibodies which Dr. James Crowe, Professor of Pediatrics, Microbiology and immunology at Vanderbilt University, says “might provide a key to a good interim treatment while a vaccine is being produced.” Note also that, like the spokes person in the UK, Dr. Crowe believes that until a virus is identified, no vaccine is possible. Compare this with the repeated US assertion that a pandemic vaccine has already been produced in the absence of any pandemic virus mutation, a scientific impossibility.
http://www.injuryboard.com/national-news/immune-system-still-fighting-the-1918-flu-pandemic.aspx?googleid=245818

We see no indication that the Avian Flu engineered pandemic events are “off the table” and believe that news outlets and journals indicate an escalating threat of an induced pandemic.

Index

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

The Natural Solutions Foundation provides frequent updates on the “Pandemic” potential of Avian Flu and other pandemic situations. Please forward this information widely with full citation: this information is provided by Natural Solutions Foundation, www.HealthFreedomUSA.org. Please sign up for free Health Freedom eAlerts (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=187)

Your donations help the Natural Solutions Foundation to provide updates like these. Please click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) make your generous recurring tax deductible donation.

Disclaimer: No one knows if the pandemic will be unleashed. Let us pray that it will not. However, we note with alarm that there are an increasing number of indicators suggesting that this Pandemic is being prepared to be used against us all using a variety of weaponized viruses. If our ringing of the alarm bells is successful, we will be spared – and we will have been wrong. Let us all devoutly hope that the Natural Solutions Foundation’s urgent and effective information dissemination is that successful.

Index

Please help to make the Pandemic secret so ineffective that the authors of this nightmare are backed off by our shared awareness. Disseminate this information to everyone you know and ask them to do the same.

Our best weapon against the coming Pandemic is truth.

Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org

Index

Many More Dots…

1. May, 2008 Multiple hybrids of Avian Flu created, all “biologically fit”.
The Canadian Press, Toronto, “An experiment mating H5N1 avian flu viruses and a strain of human flu in a laboratory produced a surprising number of hybrid viruses that were biologically fit, a new study reveals. And while none of the offspring viruses was as virulent as the original H5N1, about one in five were lethal to mice at low doses, showing they retained at least a portion of the power of their dangerous parent. The work suggests that under the right circumstances – and no one is clear what all of those are – the two types of flu viruses could swap genes in a way that might allow the H5N1 virus to acquire the capacity to trigger a pandemic. That process is called reassortment. ‘This study is just showing exactly that: There is a risk this virus can successfully reassort with a human virus,’ said Richard Webby, director of the World Health Organization’s collaborating center for influenza research at St. Jude Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9833

2. H5N1 DNA found in Vaccines, Rima E. Laibow, MD Video http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=zcniJxck0gI

3. August 16, 2008: April 1, 2005 Amended Bush Executive Order including novel influenza as trigger of Marshal Law appears again in Google Avian Flu Updates/Alerts.

“EXECUTIVE ORDER: AMENDMENT TO E.O. 13295 RELATING TO CERTAIN INFLUENZA VIRUSES AND QUARANTINABLE COMMUNICABLE DISEASES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264(b)), it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Based upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Surgeon General, and for the purpose set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003, section 1 of such order is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
“(c) Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.”
Sec. 2. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees or agents, or any other person.

George W. Bush
The White House

4. Public being indoctrinated with “inevitable” flu pandemic/Many strains of potentially pandemic virus exist.

a. May 8, 2008 WHO warns of rising bird flu pandemic risk: http://www.fiercebioresearcher.com/vaccines/story/who-warns-of-rising-bird-flu-pandemic-risk/2008-05-08

b. August 16, 2008 “Influenza experts agree that a deadly pandemic of some kind of flu is inevitable….More humans could be infected with bird flu, specifically the H9N2 strain, and that could lead to a worldwide pandemic, according to a Hong Kong expert.”: http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1523201/avian_flu_threat/

c. August 13, 2008 “Our results suggest that the establishment and prevalence of H9N2 viruses in poultry pose a significant threat for humans.” http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080813210710.1u3dk61t&show_article=1

d. August 13, 2008 Multiple strains of Avian Flu may cause Pandemic, US Scientists warn: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080813210710.1u3dk61t&show_article=1

e. August 16, 2008 Avian Flu Threat New strain of potentially pandemic flu becoming established. “More humans could be infected with bird flu, specifically the H9N2 strain, and that could lead to a worldwide pandemic, according to a Hong Kong expert.
“It’s quite possible … H9N2 is infecting humans quite a lot, much (more) than we appreciate merely because it is beyond the radar,” said Malik Peiris, a Hong Kong-based microbiologist.
“In humans, it is very mild, so most of the time it’s probably not even recognized or biologically tested,” said Peiris, who has co-authored several papers on the strain in recent years.”

f. Ohio spends millions to convince public of pandemic reality with “It…will…happen….again!” propaganda campaign: http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1218789179323820.xml&coll=2&thispage=1

g. “Pandemic”, a movie about the coming plague, released: http://www.moviestrailer.org/pandemic-movie-trailer.html

Index

h. August 17, 2008 Despite a total lack of “New News”, articles like this one are front page news all over the world: Uganda: New Strain of Bird Flu Poses a Major Threat, Jane Nafula, The Monitor, Kampla, Uganda, http://allafrica.com/stories/200808170059.html

i. Pandemic II, computer game, launched, “Do It Yourself Pandemic As a biology major in undergrad, you can imagine my glee when I found a fantastic infectious disease game at Kongregate called Pandemic II.

Basically you get to play an infectious disease, with the goal of strategically plotting infection, transmission and death across the entire globe. Chose Virus, Bacteria, or Parasite and do your best to ensure that you take special care to get Madagascar, that pesky island nation has a habit of shutting down its shipyards and ruining your chances of global domination.
Is it wrong when you’re trying to beat your own record for wiping out the whole of humanity?“:http://www.play-girlz.com/do-it-yourself-pandemic/

j. Pandemic leads list of worries in UK, beats terrorism. NOTE: UK says that no pandemic vaccine will give much protection and no vaccine will be available until the virus has been identified and then it will take 4-6 months to create it, thus giving anyone accepting the US’ story about having an effective Avian Flu vaccine available great pause: “…a flu pandemic still tops the bill in the register of risks because of the greater impact it could have across Britain and the overwhelming damage it would do to the economy because of the huge casualty rate. The assessment is that the number of deaths would be between 50,000 and 750,000, and that more than a million could need hospital care.
Experts cannot predict when it will happen but say when it does it will come in several waves of three to six months over a two-year period. A Ministry of Defense document recently released under the Freedom of Information Act said that a pandemic would generate ‘unprecedented levels of public fear, stress and panic’

The Department of Health has purchased 3.3 million doses of vaccine for the H5N1 strain of bird flu that could give a degree of protection. But the Cabinet Office gives warning that no pandemic vaccine will be available until the virus has been identified and that it will take, it is estimated, four to six months for it to be developed and manufactured.”: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4481505.ece

k. Absurd comparisons to real pandemics make the threat seem immense. Nigeria, Lagos, 9 August 2008 Segun Awofadeji, Gombe – The Gombe State Public enlightenment committee on Avian Influenza has described the disease as more dangerous and deadlier then HIV/AIDS.

This, according to the Desk Officer, communication on Avian Influenza in the state, Mr. Kassim Toro, is because it kills many people at once if it is allowed to transmit and infect human beings. He noted that although there are no confirmed cases of Avian Influenza in the State, the committee will not rest on its responsibilities of enlightening people about the dangers of the disease. According to him, over 26 states have confirmed cases of the disease including those States that are bordering Gombe State. …. [and] he vowed that the deadly disease would not be allowed to surface in Gombe State. http://allafrica.com/stories/200808200568.html

l. Inevitable is spelled “New Hampshire”. Pandemic preparation: Planning, partnerships By JOHN KOZIOL Wednesday, August 20, 2008

“Somewhere out in the world, there’s a potential pandemic with America and the Granite State’s name on it, but the good news, said state Director of Public Health Services, is that New Hampshire and local communities are planning for it….There is then the more “dicey” decision of which employee gets an antiviral drug and how it is administered to them, said Montero.There are no answers yet, Montero admitted, but along with many others, “I’m trying to figure this out.” http://www.citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080820/GJNEWS02/1911/-1/CITNEWS

5. Avian Flu Deadly in Factory Farms, Never in Outdoor Flocks
a. Deadly Avian Flu is a product of industrial poultry farms and never arises in outdoor flocks, Michael Gregor speaks at the Health Sciences Learning Center, Bird Flu: A Virus of Our Own Hatching, http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=aSpv5FmJ5tg&feature=related

b. February 2006 The Poultry Industry’s Central Role in the Bird Flu Crisis, “The transformation of poultry production in Asia in recent decades is staggering. In the Southeast Asian countries where most of the bird flu outbreaks are concentrated—Thailand, Indonesia, and Viet Nam—production jumped eightfold in just 30 years, from around 300,000 metric tonnes (mt) of chicken meat in 1971 to 2,440,000 mt in 2001. China’s production of chicken tripled during the 1990s to over 9 million metric tons per year.” http://www.grain.org/briefings/?id=194

c. Avian Flu detected in US Chickens, June, 2008. Large numbers destroyed.
Ominously, on June 3, Associated Press reported, “Tyson Foods Inc. has begun killing and burying the carcasses of 15,000 hens from a flock that tested positive for exposure to a strain of the bird flu in northwest Arkansas, state officials said.” The strain, H7N3, is a less virulent strain than the better-known H5N1 strain. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-06-03-hens_N.htm

Index

d. The industrialization of chicken-raising and slaughtering in the USA has progressed to the point that by 2003 when the first cases of H5N1 Avian Flu virus were reported from Asia, five giant multinational agribusiness companies dominated the production and processing of chicken meat in the United States. The five companies were Tyson Foods, the largest in the world; Gold Kist Inc; Pilgrim’s Pride; ConAgra Poultry; and Perdue Farms.5 Most outbreaks of Avian Flu in Asia have been traced back to such mass chicken industrial factory centers. F. William Engdahl, Saat der Zerstörung: Die dunkle Seite der Gen-Manipulation, Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg am Neckar,2007, pp. 269-271. http://newresearchfindings.blogspot.com/2008/08/pentagons-alarming-project-avian-flu.html

Tyson Foods is the largest industrialized producer of chickens in the world and has been repeatedly under attack for its unsanitary conditions of breeding and slaughtering. In January 2005, a US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report to the US Senate, “Safety in the Meat and Poultry Industry,” concluded that US meat and poultry processing plants had “one of the highest rates of injury and illness of any industry.” They cited exposure to “dangerous chemicals, blood, faecal matter, exacerbated by poor ventilation and often extreme temperatures. Workers typically faced hazardous conditions, loud noise, must work in narrow confines with sharp tools and dangerous machinery.”
Canadian experiments create new avian flu strains, all of which could become highly pathogenic and pandemic.

“In May this year, The Canadian Press reported from Toronto, “An experiment mating H5N1 avian flu viruses and a strain of human flu in a laboratory produced a surprising number of hybrid viruses that were biologically fit, a new study reveals. And while none of the offspring viruses was as virulent as the original H5N1, about one in five were lethal to mice at low doses, showing they retained at least a portion of the power of their dangerous parent. As well, a report by a Canadian organization, Beyond Factory Farming, described the transmission likely pathways from the giant industrialized chicken centers: ‘In Thailand, China and Vietnam there is a highly developed industrial poultry industry which has expanded dramatically in the past decade. The large poultry companies raise millions of birds, hatch chicks to supply other intensive poultry operations, export live birds and eggs to countries such as Nigeria (where the first Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza outbreak in Africa was recently reported) and produce and export feed which often includes “litter” (i.e., manure) in the ingredients….Manure that may contain live virus is spread on surrounding farmland, or exported as fertilizer, and through run-off may end up in surface waters where wild birds feed and rest.

Chicken manure is even found in fish farm feed formulations where it is introduced directly into the aquatic environment. Wild birds and poultry that have fallen victim to HPAI (Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza) in Asia, Turkey and Nigeria appear to have been directly exposed to HPAI virus originating in the factory farm system. In Asia, a flock of wild ducks died from HPAI—after having come into contact with the disease at a remote lake where a fish farm used feed pellets made from poultry litter from a factory farm. In Turkey a massive cull of backyard flocks—and the deaths of three children—took place after a nearby factory farm sold sick and dying birds to local peasants at cut rate prices. Nigeria has a large and poorly regulated factory poultry production sector which is supplied with chicks from factory farms in China.’” William Engdahl, Saat der Zerstörung: Die dunkle Seite der Gen-Manipulation, Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg am Neckar,2007,p. 289, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9833

4. “Solution to Avian Flu – Genetically Modified Chickens to Replace All Natural Ones” Researchers in the UK are pursuing transgenic bird flu-resistant chickens. “Once we have regulatory approval, we believe it will only take between four and five years to breed enough chickens to replace the entire world population,” said Laurence Tiley, Professor of Molecular Virology at Cambridge University. Mark Henderson, “Scientists aim to beat flu with genetically modified chickens,” The Times, London, 29 October 2005: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25149-1847760,00.html

Index

5. April 2007 Sanofi-Pasteur H5N1 vaccine approved [in US – Dr. Rima] without human trials although its effectiveness is “limited”. FDA approved the Sanofi Pasteur vaccine for H5N1 even though one year before the FDA cited Sanofi Pasteur for producing contaminated Fluzone vaccines.12 The FDA approved H5N1 vaccine is itself apparently not really effective in event of a human-to-human outbreak of Avian Flu. On announcing its approval, the FDA stated, “two injections given 28 days apart may provide ‘limited’ protection if a pandemic occurs. About 45% of people who got the vaccine in a study developed an immune response to the virus. ” This is apparently the same vaccine which causes significant numbers of deaths in Polish vagrants who received it. The doctors and nurses involved are on trial for murder in Poland. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/2235676/Homeless-people-die-after-bird-flu-vaccine-trial-in-Poland.html.

6. August 15, 2008 Armed Forces Set To Control Pandemic in Malaysia.
“The armed forces will emerge as a major player in giving assistance in case of pandemic influenza, as it has done in times of national disasters and outbreaks. Armed forces health service director-general Lt-Gen Datuk Dr Sulaiman Abdullah said it was well prepared to assist, be it in terms of human resources, transportation, handling and containing the spread of disease.”
http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1522551/armed_forces_ready_to_handle_pandemic/

7. Rapid Detection of Avian Flu Being Automated. “Scientists at Nottingham Trent University in Britain said they are developing a machine that can rapidly diagnose different types of bird flu, including the extremely infectious H5N1 bird flu virus, also known as Avian influenza.”:http://www.themedguru.com/articles/avian_flu_breakthrough_virus_detection_in_two_hours-8617572.html [Note: Avian influenza is NOT “extremely infectious”- Dr. Rima]

Index

8. Dissident Opinion.

a. Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, who has been questioning the very existence of “HIV” since 1994. In the past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of the (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is no proof of their existence. says isolated particles identified as viruses are artifacts, HIV and others do not exist. tp://www.neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm

b. Many viruses being weaponized. Viruses do not evolve without assistance into something new, “I had never thought about this aspect of their agenda. If you can get people to believe a virus can evolve into something that didn’t exist before, you can mask your genetic manipulation as natural, and it will be easily accepted by the ‘masses’.” M. Borg

c. A. True Ott, PhD says Avian Flu Misnamed: Really 1918 Flu Pandemic Repackaged.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLT0_xMeLjI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW11wZOmdSA&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2a1fPIjFDI&feature=related

9. Vaccine Dangers abound. 14 Argentine children die after experimental SKG vaccine: http://news.yahoo.com/story//ap/20080815/ap_on_he_me/argentina_children_s_deaths

10. July 10, 2008, Poultry Avian Flu Vaccine Looses Effectiveness, mutates in Hong Kong over the past 7 years of use.

dYuen Kwok-yung, who heads the microbiology department at the University of Hong Kong, said the virus is shifting away from the Fujian strain that it was developed for, according to a Jul 8 Deutsche Presse-Argentur (DPA) report.

He told city officials that they must ban all live chickens from markets before the vaccine becomes completely ineffective. Tests on birds in 2005 suggested that the vaccine generated only a quarter of the antibody response it did in 2001.

In early June, animal health workers detected the virus in poultry feces at several market stalls. They did not say if the testing was done in response to sick or dead birds, and the source of the virus has not been determined.

Since then, officials have banned poultry from overnight stays in the market and have proposed a total ban on live poultry in Hong Kong markets. They have offered traders and farmers compensation packages in return for surrendering their sales licenses, but the offer has angered the poultry merchants, who have said the government’s offer was too low.http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/avianflu/news/jul1008avian-br.html

11. July 7, 2008, Avian Flu now officially endemic in Egypt. Officials in Egypt told the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) that several H5N1 outbreaks that have occurred since February and formally declared that the disease is endemic in Egyptian poultry flocks. The report said Egypt will now file updates on its H5N1 outbreaks only every 6 months.

News about poultry outbreaks in Egypt has been sparse this year, though the country reported a handful of human cases in February, March, and April.

According to the latest OIE report, covering the months February though mid June, Egypt has had 19 new outbreaks since the last update. Seven of them occurred after May 1. The most recent one was a small outbreak in Luxor that affected backyard chickens, geese, and ducks.
About half of the most recent outbreaks occurred in backyard flocks; five occurred at live bird markets and four struck commercial farms, three of which housed layer chickens. Most of the outbreaks were along the Nile River delta. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/avianflu/news/jul1008avian-br.html

12. Natural Solutions Foundation data on weaponized Avian Flu goes viral. The first 24 pages of 13,300 Google search results for “Weaponized Avian Flu” are Foundation information. Foundation data sighted by noted researcher F. William Engdahl:http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/2352 among many, many others. http://newresearchfindings.blogspot.com/2008/08/pentagons-alarming-project-avian-flu.html

Index

Resources and Previous Related Information

Weaponized Avian Flu Update, Videos: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=742
Weaponized Avian Flu – Assault on the Body Politic: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=746
Avian Flu: Well Designed Fear: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=747
Weaponized Avian Flu Press Release Stiffled: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=750
Protecting Yourself in a Pandemic: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=752
Weaponized Avian Flu: Current Intelligence Estimate.1: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=755

Index

Consumer Voices Ring Loud, Even to Monsanto! rBGH to be Sold

Wednesday, August 13th, 2008

Natural Solutions Foundation repeats and repeats that our voices, together, are among the most powerful forces in the world when it comes to making things right.
Here is a potent example of that power:
Monsanto, the Biotech giant responsible for a huge percentage of all genetically modified organisms, as well as “wonder chemicals” (i.e., it’s a wonder they are legal) like aspartame and Agent Orange, has finally realized that the recombinent bovine growth hormone it has been selling in the US and elsewhere as “Prosilac” (TM) is a liability, no matter how much FDA and USDA support it has been able to purchase.

Those agencies may say that it is safe, but consumers do not want milk, milk products, meat or other products which are contaminated with rBGH. And it is the voice of the consumer, like the voice of the turtle, which is heard in the land.

Below you will find an article which outlines the decision by Monsanto to sell off the product which has become a liability, despite its profitability.

Good for us! Good for our children. And good for our planet!

Thanks for buying non-rBGH products and making noise about it.

And thanks for supporting the Natural Solutions Foundation so it could attend Codex, bring information to countries and delegates, write Health Freedom eAlerts and generally be the leading voice of health freedom around the world. All donations are tax deductible and represent our only means of support since we have no corporate or other sponsorship besides your generosity and conviction that you need us. We certainly need you! Please make your recurring donation here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189). Thanks!

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv

A Decade of Consumer Pressure Is Driving Monsanto’s Bovine Growth Hormone off the Market

* Monsanto Dairy Hormone Division For Sale Amid Consumer Concerns
By Jane Akre
Injury Board, August 6, 2008
Straight to the Source

Monsanto announces its selling its posilac division that makes bovine growth hormone.

St. Louis-based Monsanto announced today it is selling the division that produces bovine growth hormone, also known as rBGH or rBST.

There’s no problem with the product, insists the company. During a conference call today, Monsanto’s Chrissie Chavis told reporters that Posilac, as it’s known commercially, is a “solid successful product of significant value to dairy farmers.”

But nationwide a growing number of consumers and dairy processors feel otherwise. “No artificial growth hormones used” is now commonly displayed on store shelves from Florida to California.

The proposed sale, she said, allows the company to focus on genetically engineered seed. “Our long term growth platform is focused on corn, soybeans, cotton and vegetables. Repositioning the business would ensure that loyal dairy farmers could continue to receive the value of Posilac in their operations.”

Posilac, is sold in an injectable form to an unknown number of dairy farmers in the U.S. and internationally. Monsanto refused to divulge sales figures, but insists that one-third of the nation’s cows receive injections. The USDA estimate that number to be more in the range of 15 percent.

The dairy drug is now made at the company’s Augusta, Georgia plant after production problems at its Austrian facility forced it to close earlier this year.

The sale would include the Augusta, Georgia plant facility. In the meantime it’s “business as usual,” said Chavis about whether operations there would cease.

Monsanto has no timeline for the sale and would not comment to *IB News* on any prospective buyers, though Chavis says the product could complement animal production or pharmaceutical companies.

Consumer surveys show that over the last decade, consumers have rejected buying milk from artificial hormone treated cows.

In the last several years, major retailers such as Safeway, Publix and Kroger have decided to ban the artificial hormone in their store-brand milk. Starbucks has refused to purchase dairy from treated cows at its 6,793 company-operated stores. Chipotle Mexican Grill, a McDonalds spinoff, has banned rBST in its company stores.

In January, Kraft Foods announced it would offer a line of cheese made with rBGH-free milk, despite assurances from the FDA that it is safe. Glanbia, a high-volume cheese production company in Idaho and New Mexico, will phase out the use of Posilac by next year. Dean Foods, the largest U.S. dairy company now offers a line of rBST-free products.

Recently agriculture officials around the country moved to limit labels on dairy products that disclosed whether they came from treated or untreated cows. In February, consumer pressure led to a reversal of a labeling prohibition in Pennsylvania.

Has pressure from consumers led to Monsanto’s decision? Chavis denies it. “Our core focus is in the seeds and trace business. Since 1994 it’s (Posilac) been a very strong product for us. We’ve sold more doses this year than we sold last year. We see significant opportunity in the future in the U.S. as well as the international markets.”

The company plans to continue sales outside of the country, particularly Mexico and Brazil.

rBGH is approved for use in 20 countries, says the Monsanto spokesperson, although it is banned in all of Europe, Japan, Australia and other industrialized countries, with the exception of the U.S.

rBGH was approved by the FDA in November 1993 and marketed in February 1994. Studies show that milk from treated cows has an increased level of a spinoff hormone, IGF-1, which causes the cow to produce more milk. IGF-1 is identical in cows and humans, and studies show that it causes cells to proliferate, including cancerous cells.

The Cancer Prevention Coalition’s Dr. Sam Epstein says that the IGF-1 from rBGH treated milk is “supercharged” and can lead to an increased number of cancers in humans. Consumers Union cites that elevated mastitis rates among treated cows leads to additional antibiotic treatment in the animal. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics “may pass into humans through milk, air, water or soil, or through ground meat”, says Michael Hansen, a senior scientist with CU.

Terry Etherton, at Penn State University, says the growth of rBGH-free products is “part of a smoke-and-mirrors campaign” that means consumers are paying more for products of questionable value.

Chavis positioned the new face of Posilac as a “green” alternative for farmers. Studies at Cornell University, where Monsanto has funded dairy scientist Dale Bauman and his studies since the 1990s, show that the drug allows big savings in terms of feed and land.

“As the environmental pressure on agriculture gets greater, this allows dairy producers to produce more milk with less (sic) cows thereby reducing the overall carbon footprint of milk production,” said Chavis.

Posilac was the first in a long line of genetically engineered products to be introduced by Monsanto, a former chemical company. Monsanto is increasingly focusing on buying seed companies and converting the industry to its own brand of genetically engineered seeds, where qualities of foreign plants or plants and animals are merged to create seeds that can be patented. The company then charges a premium for the seeds and requires farmers internationally to sign user contracts.

More than half of the U.S. soybeans and corn that make up roughly 70 percent of pre-packages grocery store items come from genetically engineered ingredients.

Recently, rBGH has been tested on catfish and tilapia to increase growth.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_14008.cfm

Making the HIV/AIDS Virus Mistake – Doctors First

Sunday, August 10th, 2008

Disclaimer: No one knows if the pandemic will be unleashed. Let us pray that it will not. However, we note with alarm that there are an increasing number of indicators suggesting that this Pandemic is being prepared to be used against us all using a variety of weaponized viruses. If our ringing of the alarm bells is successful, we will be spared – and we will have been wrong. Let us all devoutly hope that the Natural Solutions Foundation’s urgent and effective information dissemination is that successful.

Please help to make the Pandemic secret so ineffective that the authors of this nightmare are backed off by our shared awareness. Disseminate this information to everyone you know and ask them to do the same.

Our best weapon against the coming Pandemic is truth.
Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMedia.tv
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org

HIV is caused by a retrovirus, right? Well, no, not really. In fact, there is no evidence whatsoever for this hypothesis. How could they all be wrong, asks Anthony Brink on Consumercide.com.
His article is so well written that we will use it to begin our series of examinations of the discredited, but still widely believed, idea that there is such a thing as the AIDS or HIV virus and that it causes a disease now knows as HIV/AIDS.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org
www.NaturalSoluitonsMedia.tv

HOW COULD THEY ALL BE WRONG? DOCTORS AND AIDS
Anthony Brink arbrink@iafrica.com

I suppose one has a greater sense of intellectual degradation after an interview with a doctor than from any other human experience. –Alice James

A response sometimes heard to the expression of doubt about the integrity of the HIV-AIDS paradigm as a medical model for understanding disease incidence is, “How could all the doctors in the world be wrong?” There are many possible answers to this question.

One might point out that unanimity has never guaranteed the soundness of medical constructs, and examples of this abound. The history of medicine both ancient and modern is a wrecking-yard full of broken and abandoned ideas. In this century alone innumerable medical theses have collapsed to which nearly all doctors once subscribed, such as bacterial theories of scurvy, beriberi, and pellagra, and more recently, the immuno-surveillance and retroviral theories of cancer aetiology – for which billions of dollars funded thousands of convincing research papers during the “War on Cancer” declared by Nixon in 1971. Then there was swine flu: 1976 saw President Gerald Ford on television, at the behest of the American medical establishment, solemnly urging all Americans to get vaccinated against an imminent deadly influenza epidemic. About 50 million Americans were panicked into being immunised with useless or harmful vaccines rushed onto the market. Adverse reactions resulted in damages claims of $2.7 billion. Not a single case of swine flu appeared subsequent to the death of a sick recruit undergoing basic training in a boot camp in New Jersey (hardly an unusual event) that had ignited all the hysteria. Before HIV-AIDS, and alongside the mad cow craze in Britain and the avian flu folly in Hong Kong, the great swine flu fiasco was perhaps the most telling instance in recent times of how Medicine can lose its head.

Another answer to the question goes to the fact that most doctors have scarcely more than a layman’s grasp of the concepts that populate biology at its molecular horizon. For instance, most would gape dully if asked to define the peculiar characteristics of a retrovirus (like HIV, we’re told) as distinct from other viruses, or distinguish endogenous and exogenous retroviruses, or articulate the rival contentions advanced by molecular biologists about whether the whole of retrovirology might be a mistake, a wrong turn at a scientific road-fork, a bad inference drawn from the evidence of certain metabolic biochemical phenomena which look odd when seen against old-fashioned rules of molecular genetics, and the possibility that retroviruses might not exist as infectious agents at all – that it is rather the classical dogma that needs an overhaul. Taxed about the HIV theory of AIDS, most doctors can do little more than quote the claims of their authorities, like priests citing papal bulls and encyclicals, making obeisance to their cardinals.

A third answer would make the impudent point that it is fallacious to imagine that doctors generally have a superior capacity for reasoning than their patients. The notes given medical students speak to the scant education that doctors receive in this art. To read them is to see how flimsy medical and biological theories are dished up as fact for rote learning, making the kind of call-and-answer instruction one sees in farm schools in this country look like an adventure in lateral-thinking training. Doctors do so well at school because they’re the kind of guys who are the most easily schooled. In myths and legends to outdo the Hare Krishna people. Especially virologists, who occupy the haughtiest medical echelons, but who seem to have the dimmest bulbs in the upper storey. As revealed by what they swallow without a hiccup. And regurgitate to their students. Like the timeless French fancy (“Le Rage”) that a bite from a dog acting wild and crazy can make you go mad and die. (But not the dog; man is the ‘end-host’.) You can go the same way from eating steak. Although nobody can plausibly say why. Or some cancers are caused by viruses and are infectious. Or the most hilarious notion of them all: semen and vaginal secretions can be deadly. Mothers’ milk too. But not spit. All of a sudden. After millions of years. Thanks to a mutated virus from monkeys. Or maybe the moon. And all of this without any evidence. Not a shred. And there’s a funny part to it. You might be feeling fine. But you’re sure to go in six months time from any one of a couple of dozen diseases or malignancies. No, make that two years, well actually five; shall we say eight, or ten, or twelve, maybe fifteen; OK perhaps your life is just shortened a bit. Definitely? Yes, most certainly; no, not necessarily. Look, we don’t know. How, why? We don’t have the faintest idea. Theories zigzag like a drunk at the wheel. (“We are still confused, only we are now confused at a higher level of understanding.”) Excuse me. Is this the circus?

Nor do doctors necessarily proceed from a more rational mindset than Joe Public does. The opposite may be the case. That HIV-AIDS as a medical construct could have taken root so richly among doctors, despite its absurd fundamental tenets (which fly in the face of everything known to virology), illustrates the point. As Harvey Bialy, scholar in residence at the Biotechnology Institute at the University of Mexico and editor at large of the prestigious science journal Nature Biotechnology puts it, the HIV theory of AIDS “turns immunology upside down and inside out.” To begin with, never before was the presence of antibodies taken to be prognostic of future disease. They used to be thought of as good things – evidence, where the patient appears healthy, of a successful immune response to a pathogen defeated. Former molecular biology professor at Johns Hopkins and Harvard Universities, Charles Thomas predicts that after the balloon pops, historians will be studying the flight of common sense in the lunacy of the AIDS age, “for a 100 years, …how America gave AIDS to the world.” But since HIV-AIDS as a diagnostic construct is still hegemonically regnant in our time, the point about the way doctors as a group tend to think needs illustrating with a different example. What better than the turn Medicine took during the Third Reich.

The Nazis’ virulently irrational and barbarous doctrines of racial hygiene found huge appeal for German and Austrian doctors in that era. No other profession was as well represented on Nazi party membership lists. From an ostensibly sober, rational profession functioning as an elite caste in a culture that seemed itself to be the fruit of the Enlightenment, just under half of them were card-carrying Nazis. Of course not all engaged in the sadistic butchery of untermenschen for which the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trials were conducted, but it would be a mistake to imagine that such criminals were aberrant quacks from the fringes, flourishing like vermin on the opportunities created within the Nazi eugenics paradigm. In fact many medical practitioners and academics tried or named in testimony at the trials had enjoyed international eminence in their professional fields. Dr Edwin Katzenellenbogen, for instance, (who got life imprisonment) had served on the faculty of the Harvard Medical School.

Scholars of religious thinking have long known that the more horrible and improbable the founding superstitions of a new faith, the greater its capacity to mobilize the popular imagination and the stronger the force of its revolutionary engine. In Medicine, Religion’s first cousin, the same sometimes applies. Like an infant upstart religion with imperial designs, the HIV-AIDS paradigm calls for a vigorous rebellion against long-established models of understanding. Woe betide any conservative scientists reluctant to become conversos to the rude new creed, who point out that the new theory is absurd on its face, that the link between AIDS and sex is no stronger than its link with sleeping; they become marginalised like Jews defying the demands of medieval Christendom, not racked and burned, but ostracised – scientifically defrocked, blacklisted and delegitimated, stripped of research funding, banned from lecturing podia, kicked out of their laboratories, rendered unemployable in academia or industry, menaced with confinement in psychiatric wards, isolated from graduate students in whom they might instill similar heretic doubts, and barred from publishing in the journals that once craved their papers. But naturally; radical political dissident Noam Chomsky, Professor of Linguistics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology has pointed out that “if you serve power, power rewards you with respectability. If you work to undermine power…you are reviled, imprisoned, driven into the desert.” The AIDS phenomenon at root is a vast pumping aggregation of interests with enormous political and economic power. Doctors and scientists who challenge its sacred tenets risk attracting the wrath of the revolution’s red guards. They won’t be thrown from windows. But their careers will be over. For their reactionary intransigence these critics will be marked always with pejorative epithets, as persistent as tattoos, like ‘discredited’, ‘loony’, ‘maverick’, ‘dangerous’ and ‘irresponsible and pernicious’. Just to make sure we correctly tell the wits from the dunces. And to discourage us from asking, “Well, what are these guys actually saying?”

A fourth explanation lies in the fact that for all their social status and prestige, in truth doctors generally function close to the bottom of the food-chain in the medical-industrial complex, and serve as little more than a thoughtless delivery system for the pharmaceutical corporations – whose wares they peddle makes the medical drug industry one of the most profitable legal enterprises on the planet. Just how little room doctors are allowed for independent judgment founded on their own observations is revealed in the fact that in some places a doctor who declines to follow an approved treatment regimen such as chemotherapy for cancerous tumours, in view of his empirical assessment of its utter uselessness and lethal toxicity, risks sanctions from his controlling guild. Imagine the trouble a doctor would be in were he brazenly to announce his conclusion that having investigated the business, reactive HIV antibody test results are virtually meaningless – pointers to no more than heightened non-specific immunologic activity. And were he to refuse to diagnose negative or positive, selecting for life or death, like a Nazi doctor calling links or rechts. Or marking ‘+’ on the medical files of slow or crippled German children, to mark them for murder during the euthanasia programme.

In sum, one doesn’t have to cast about too far for answers to the question, “How could all the doctors in the world be wrong about AIDS?” Medicine’s penchant for screwing up magnificently, its characteristic intellectual sluggishness, and the appeal of “magical thinking” for its practitioners is plain to anyone who turns back a few pages. http://health.consumercide.com/brink-wrong.html