Archive for June, 2005

CODEX Hearing: Was Anybody Listening?

Monday, June 13th, 2005

The Natural Solutions Foundation made an 11 hour round trip (by car) from New York to Washington, DC, to present 5 minutes of comments to the US CODEX Office Public Hearing on CODEX June 9, 2005.

It was an amazing experience!

In DC, we met Dr. Ed Scarbrough, US Manager for CODEX ALIMENTARIUS.

Dr. Scarbrough, a seemingly pleasant silver-haired gentleman, who has obviously been doing this sort of thing for a very long time, recognized me when I introduced myself before the meeting and mentioned our Citizen’s Petition.

I asked whether we should make our remarks at the end of the meeting, devoted to the dietary supplements issue, or the beginning, the public policy section since our Citizen’s Petition deals with global US CODEX policy, not just nutrients. He and his assistant felt that since the CODEX ALIMENTARIUS Vitamin and Mineral Standard is coming up for ratification in July, we should speak at the end of the meeting.

Delegate after delegate reported on the work that the Committees they attend does and what the US Policy toward each measure in July will be.

When we got to the topic of dietary supplements, Dr. Scarbrough announced that the US Policy was to endorse the Vitamin and Mineral Standard in July and opened the floor for discussion. I was the first speaker. And, as it turned out, I had the opportunity to speak a number of times as did General Stubblebine. We have a transcript of my presentation at the CODEX public hearing, in PDF format. Click on the link to read my prepared comments for the meeting.

I pointed out to the hearing and to the record, that the US Policy on this measure (CODEX Vitamin and Mineral Standard) violated US Law and would result in vast harm both here and abroad. Dr. Scarbrough listened with apparent calm and began a very useful process: he asked us to put our questions in writing and acknowledged that he was intending to answer our petition.

Over and over again, whether the speaker was General Stubblebine referring to his 32 years of service to this country in defense of its freedoms and his unwillingness to lose them to corporate special interests, or the pleas from folks who spoke of their urgent personal requirements for high potency supplements to maintain themselves out of hospitals, or my questions about law, Dr. Scarbrough asked us to put our comments in writing.

When Dr. S. stated that there was no scientific literature showing that nutrients were safe, I told him that was simply not true. He said that he was not unaware of any such literature. His lack of awareness of such literature is not in alignment with the reality that such scientific literature does indeed exist. Thus, US policy to support the Vitamin and Mineral Standard is based on the (false) belief that nutrients are not proven safe! This is severe disconnect from the science of nutrition, plain and simple.

So I asked him publicly if the US policy on the CODEX Vitamin and Mineral Standard, officially determined on June 16, was subject to change in the face of information such as a dossier of scientific literature proving nutrients to be safe…

… and he answered that there was a possibility of changing that policy. I pressed him (still publicly) to find out if the possibility was a practical reality or just a theoretical one. His answer?

“Theoretical.”

Dr. Scarbrough has actually done us a favor by asking for questions and comments in writing. We will be putting all our questions and objections on the record.

If you care about health freedom, I advise you to do the following (your support is critical):

1. Join in the Citizen’s Petition via our 6 Easy Steps to Protecting America from CODEX.

2. Send your comments and questions to F. Edward Scarbrough, Ph.D., U.S. CODEX Manager by email at USCodex@fsis.usda.gov. Remind Dr. Scarbrough that you are aware that US Policy on the Vitamin and Mineral Standard violates US law as indicated in the Natural Solutions Foundation Citizen’s Petition and request a written response from him. Include your personal reason for not wanting the US to support this (deadly) standard. Tell Dr. Scarbrough that it is the legal and moral obligation of the US to support our own DSHEA law as the national standard, not the dangerous Vitamin and Mineral Standard of CODEX backed by the undemocratic World Trade Organization.

3. Email us a copy of your letter telling us if we may publish it on the web site to share with others.

4. Write a letter to the editor of your local paper (or national one, for that matter) and make it clear that the US Policy on the CODEX Vitamin and Mineral Standard, as indicated by Dr. Scarbrough, violates US law. But still, in spite of its deadly impact nationally and globally, the CODEX Vitamin and Mineral Standard is being pushed for (you can show the editor our Citizen’s Petition to explain the case for US CODEX Policy being in violation of US law).

5. Spread the word to everyone you know to do the same. If you have a mailing list, please distribute information about HealthFreedomUSA.org, our Citizen’s Petition, and our 6 Easy Steps to Protecting America from CODEX.

Put our questions and comments in writing, Dr. Scarbrough? Get written opinions from the US Government on why they are violating US law and supporting a standard which will lead to the death and preventable suffering of nearly uncountable numbers of people? Create a record of our objections to these illegal doings which REQUIRES an answer from the government?

YOU BET!

Thank you, Dr. Scarbrough.

Yours in Health and Freedom,

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation

P.S. And if you haven’t already, make sure to take action yourself on the 6 Easy Steps to Protecting America from CODEX.

BusinessWeek Raises Concerns About CODEX ALIMENTARIUS

Saturday, June 11th, 2005

BusinessWeek, a mainstream publication, has published an article raising serious concern about CODEX. The title of the article is “Complex Diet for Small Business” (full article).

Here’s an interesting excerpt:

“Certain other vitamins and minerals now readily available could end up pulled from the shelves. The U.S. could find itself under intense pressure to accept the new regulations — despite opposition from most consumers — or risk being in violation of international trade rules. “

CODEX is real, and the Vitamin and Mineral Standard is heading toward us this July. We must all accept responsibility under democracy (the responsibility to act in the best interest of our nation), and take action to protect health freedom from CODEX ALIMENTARIUS.

You are in the right place because you have at your disposal the power to join other Americans and take action to protect health freedom from CODEX.

We’ve had many people taking action on our web site. If you haven’t already, please take action now. It is easy, convenient, takes only between 5 and 10 minutes, and it is exactly your action that will take us one step closer to warding CODEX off.

– Fox

Good Going at Codex Office Public Hearing!

Saturday, June 11th, 2005

“You must do the thing which you think you cannot do.”
– Eleanor Roosevelt

On Thursday June 9, Rima E. Laibow, M.D., presented for several minutes in front of the Codex Office Public Hearing. It was our Citizen’s Petition that got Dr. Laibow a spot at the hearing. As a result of the hearing, a very promising development has arisen. A press release is being prepared explaining the full details. The press release will be distributed by early next week.

Stay tuned (subscribe to the Codex Action Alert to be updated via email). And keep those keyboards and mice aimed at the action page! Take action now to do your part to protect health freedom from CODEX. All of us have a responsibility to take action so that we can protect health freedom in America from the tyranny of CODEX.

And please keep those donations coming. Donate now. Without your donations, we have no source of funding. Without funding, how can we work to protect health freedom in America from CODEX?

– Fox

Good News: Dr. Laibow Presenting at Codex Office Public Hearing

Thursday, June 9th, 2005

Washington, D.C. (PRWEB) June 8, 2005 — Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.) announced today that the Natural Solutions Foundation has been invited to appear before a Codex Office Public Hearing on CODEX ALIMENTARIUS set for June 9, 2005 at the USDA in Washington. On June 1, 2005, the Natural Solution Foundation submitted a Citizen’s Petition demanding the U.S. CODEX Office (U.S. Department of Agriculture) follow US law and change its policies to limit support for international Dietary Supplement harmonization (and any other international harmonization) only as it conforms to United States law.

(Full text of press release.)

What does this mean for the campaign to protect health freedom and America from CODEX?

Here’s what it means: Dr. Laibow will be presenting two hundred signed letters (with real signatures) as part of the Citizen’s Petition. She will be presenting these letters to the attendees of the meeting.

Two hundred letters each with signatures (with more coming in to the HealthFreedomUSA HQ everyday) will show the bureaucrats in Washington that Americans are not happy about CODEX. Showing Congress that Americans don’t want CODEX is critical to halting the march of CODEX.

Folks: this is just the beginning of what the HealthFreedomUSA campaign is geared up to accomplish. We have the Declaration of Health Independence, we have the 6 Easy Steps to Protecting Health Freedom from CODEX, and we are seeing more and more people taking action on our web site everyday.

Stay tuned for updates on the public hearing. And please donate to help pay for expenses such as travel, accommodation, and this blog and the HealthFreedomUSA.org web site.

Note: all Americans are welcome to add their name to the petition. If you want your name on the petition, click here.

DSHEA: It’s Not Just a Good Idea, It’s the Law!

Wednesday, June 8th, 2005

One of my favorite tee shirts adorned the sweaty body of a contra dancer at Princeton University some years ago.

It sported a picture of Albert Einstein and his famous mane of hair with a quote that read, “E=mc2: It’s not just a good idea, it’s the law!”

Good point.

Some things are more than just a neat concept. DSHEA is one of them.

The 1994 Dietary Supplements Health Education Act (or DSHEA) is a good idea and it is the law, too. In fact, in my estimation, DSHEA is one of the best laws passed by the US Congress. If you are interested in getting healthy and staying that way in a stressful, toxic world, DSHEA is an important ally in your quest to find natural solutions to your health needs.

Passed because of public outrage at the thought of losing access to dietary supplements, 100 Senators bowed to logic, good sense and political expediency and passed DSHEA unanimously despite the tremendous opposition of the drug companies. DSHEA says that supplements are foods and, as such, they cannot be limited, although they can, like other foods, be regulated and kept safe. Supplements and herbs are food so they can have no upper limits. After all, there are no upper limits on lettuce, rutabagas or lamb, so why should there be any one vitamins, minerals and co factors? There shouldn’t.

DSHEA seemed like a real popular victory in 1994. It had been vigorously opposed by Big Pharma (which was big then, but not nearly as big as it is now) and still the people had prevailed to the extent that no senator dared oppose their will. Once DSHEA was a matter of law, health freedom and the right to choose natural options were secure. Right? Unfortunately, wrong.

Over the intervening decade-plus since 1994, attempts to weaken, circumvent or gut DSHEA keep cropping up. These threats to your health freedom come from lobbyists who are there to help Congress see the gleam of money (last year, according to USA Today, April 26, 2005, Big Pharma spent more than $758 million on Congressional Drug Lobbying). That’s an astonishing $7.48 million per senator!

And what do the people who pay the lobbyists get?

An onslaught of attacks against our right to take as much Vitamin C or Co Q 10 or Echinacea as we want to. In other words, both lawmakers (like Dick Durban who tried to gut DSHEA in the last Congress with S722) and bureaucrats who work for the FDA, continually look for ways to take away your right to determine your own health course. They claim to be seeking to “protect” you (from yourself?) but that is not the real reason these lobbyists are working so hard to restrict your access to nutritional supplements.

During the previous (108th) Congress, a spate of bills were introduced to make the playing ground between drugs (high risk, high profit) and supplements (low risk, low profits) even more uneven. None of them passed. But while that was going on, the FDA was using its regulatory power to attack safe and effective herbs like Echinacea and ephedra (attacked relentlessly in the establishment-obedient press as a dangerous substance with nary a regard for the truth) . In April, a Federal judge reviewed the science (“unscientific and irrelevant”, said the judge) and the premise (“unscientific and irrelevant”, said the judge) for the ephedra ban. Most important, she reaffirmed that the intent of the Congress and the American People in DSHEA was to make available health aids like supplements, nutrients and herbs as foods and let people decide how to use them. The irrational and arbitrary ephedra ban for the low dose herb was reversed by a Federal judge.

A note about ephedra: it is erroneously blamed for a very small number of deaths. Perhaps 8 deaths MIGHT be related to its incorrect overuse in the presence of disease and pharmaceutical drugs, dehydration and kidney failure over the last 15 years (and every one of those is only questionably related to the herb). Aspirin, an unregulated but potent drug, kills 1500 people in the US per year.

You probably remember a lot of poison press about the “dangers” of ephedra and very little about the reversal of the ban two months ago. The press carried the first story to an extreme degree, and the second hardly at all. But where is the outcry to ban aspirin? Probably whispered in the same official corridors as the inaudible FDA outcry to ban Vioxx, I would imagine, wouldn’t you?

Yours in health and freedom,

Rima E. Laibow, M.D.
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/

Make a donation to help the campaign to protect America from CODEX