Archive for 2008

Food Crisis Hits Home

Saturday, March 22nd, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, as well as our US-based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Why is the agriculturally blessed US facing rising food costs which make it more and more difficult for more and more people to buy food? What if prices rise for real food which has not been genetically modified and fake food, which has been genetically modified (like the corn now in the food supply which was created to cause male sterility) is cheaper and more widely available? What would people buy and what would people eat?

The fancy breads impacted here are just the snowy frost on the tip of the iceberg. Food prices are rising all over the world at dizzying rates while food stocks are depleted and many parts of the world are just days away from running out of food. These two curves, one up at a tremendous rate and one down even faster, are a graphic representation of disaster. Maybe once upon a time the US would have been busy providing emergency rations to help the masses who will be impacted first and backing off from its policy of encouraging the planting of increasing amounts of food-production land into biofuel crops. Not now. The policy makers want more inefficient and expensive biofuel and fewer people around to use it, despite the failed mathematics of that equation and the increased energy cost of biofuel.

First the croissants and other luxury items become more expensive that people can afford, then their staples, then… what? Obviously, this economy of scarcity and shortage will not impact everyone equally and at the same time. But look down the socioeconomic ladder and see what is coming up towards you. If you do not like it (and I certainly do not), let’s find ways to change it. Growing as much of your own food organically or doing so in a coop is one way to make the changes. Supporting clean agriculture will bring its price down. Look into local Community Supported Agriculture (CSA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community-supported_agriculture) and arrange with local farmers to supply you with what you need. Rationale: it is clean, healthy for you and the environment and supports the kind of agriculture, organic or biodynamic, that we need on this planet.

But make a positive change in your food procurement habits and begin making a difference in your own life and in the life of the economy and the planet.

Now would be a good time to start. And now would also be a good time to support the Natural Solutions Foundation with your generous taqx deductible recurring donation. You know you can depend on the Natural Solutions Foundation. Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to let us know that we can depend on you.

Soaring wheat costs means higher costs at bakeries

By Karen Gaudette
3/21/2008

Seattle Times staff reporter

The way wheat prices are hopping up, Puget Sound bakeries from wee Café Besalu to giant Costco might start wishing for Easter baskets of their own this year — stuffed with sacks of flour.

Bakeries of all sizes around the region are raising prices on loaves of bread, hamburger buns, croissants, doughnuts and pastries, some for the second or third time in the past year, trying to keep pace with the rising cost of flour, sugar, eggs, butter and even packaging made from petroleum products.

But for those who make their dough from dough, the hardest increase to swallow has been flour.

Bakers have cringed as the price of the standard 100-pound sack of flour soared from less than $10 at the start of 2007 to anywhere from $25 to upwards of $40 now.

“We’re all shell shocked right now. Anyone who is dealing with that floury stuff is right now finding out basically that the earth has shifted underneath our feet,” said Gillian Allen-White, general manager of Grand Central Baking Company.

“Everyone I know that’s baking is kind of freaking out right now,” said James Miller of Café Besalu in Seattle’s Ballard neighborhood. “We’ve only raised our prices once in seven years yet everything has just gone up so much more.”

National dilemma

Bakers have taken their concerns all the way to the nation’s capital. Baking trade groups that represent giants like Hostess to supermarket chains to family-owned bakeries lobbied Congress last week to put fields currently lying fallow into wheat production.

Wheat costs so much these days for a sheaf of reasons: Crop failures in Australia and Russia, rising demand among the growing middle class in China and India, and soaring shipping costs along with the price of diesel and gasoline. More wheat farmers here and around the globe are also replacing wheat with corn and other grains that can be processed into biofuels.

Washington farmers have moved about 30,000 additional acres into wheat production, said wheat commission chief executive Tom Mick, but that’s small potatoes compared to the 18.5 million acres devoted to wheat around the state. Wheat prices are at record highs, but so are prices for plenty of other grains they grow, he said.

And it’s not all rainbows for wheat farmers. They may be earning more, but they’re also paying more for everything from fertilizer to diesel.

“They’re paying down their debts, but not going out buying new pickups or Cadillacs or anything like that,” Mick said.

The organization that represents smaller bakeries, Virginia-based Retail Bakers of America, is urging its members to raise prices rather than continue trying to absorb the cost. At this point, they say it’s about survival for bakers who have struggled for years to compete against supermarkets.

“It wouldn’t be so bad if it was just the wheat, but we’re dealing with price increases across the board,” said Lynn Schurman, president-elect of Retail Bakers of America and owner of Cold Spring Bakery in Minnesota. “Eggs are up, dairy’s up, some of the shortenings are up … the combination of the different price increases coming is really scary for bakers. I don’t know that it’s ever happened like this.”

The latest consumer price index report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s economic research service bears this out. The cost of a dozen grade A eggs rose by nearly 30 percent during 2007 and was expected to rise an additional percent this year. Dairy (milk, cheese, butter) prices rose by 7.4 percent and were expected to go up another 2 or 3 percent in 2008. Fats and oils are expected to increase by as much as 7 percent this year.

Spokane wheat farmer Fred Fleming calls these the highest prices he can remember in four generations of farming Eastern Washington. Once, $6 a bushel was a price that grabbed headlines. Now it sells for about $12.50 at the Portland Grain Exchange.

“Usually in a baker’s life one product might go up and one goes down, so there’s a balancing act. Right now every thing’s just going up, so there’s no balance,” Fleming said.

Fleming co founded Shepherd’s Grain, a collective of farmers growing wheat in a more environmentally friendly manner. In keeping with the group’s goal of sustainability, he’s tried to keep prices below the national average (Shepherd’s Grain charges $9.70 a bushel, or about $26 per 100-pound sack of flour, which they mill).

Stretching the dough

All these expenses have prompted some new coping behaviors. Bakers say they’re making fewer varieties of bread, not refilling stocks when they run out and mixing different varieties of flour — everything they can think of to avoid big price increases.

Miller of Café Besalu has taken to pondering the weather before he pops his trademark croissants in the oven.

“The idea for us is if it’s sort of sunny in the morning and then raining by 11:30, everyone just decides oh, the heck with it, let’s go get a coffee. If it’s rainy, people sleep in in the morning,” Miller said. “Even though none of it is an exact science, you just have to be really careful not to over bake.”

Grand Central, which raised prices around the holidays, no longer delivers more bread to supermarkets than it expects to sell and is encouraging customers to place orders in advance to ensure those cookies and cakes they want will be available, Allen-White said. And, she feels badly about not having as much day-old bread to pass along to charities like Northwest Harvest.

Raising prices is risky business. For consumers already paying more for groceries and seeing $4-per-gallon gasoline on the horizon, at what price will they simply scrap the scone and coffee as too much?

“At the grocery store if milk goes up they just raise the price and that’s that,” Miller said. “When people have coffee and a pastry, they have a mental price they’re willing to pay.”

“Your customers are used to paying a certain amount,” said William Leaman, owner of West Seattle’s Bakery Nouveau. Open barely a year, Leaman says he’s relieved he was able to take food costs into account when he set his prices so that he could delay increases so far. “I’m going to try to hold off on that as long as I can, but when it really starts to affect the bottom line I may have to make some adjustments.”

QFC supermarkets have seen the cost of flour boost prices in both packaged goods and in ingredients used in their bakeries, said spokeswoman Kristin Maas. At Costco, house-baked bread, muffins and bagels went up 50 cents Monday to offset all the price increases.

“We’d been riding it out, hoping things would change,” said bakery operations vice president Sue McConnaha.

Aside from flour, she’s watched the soybean oil her bakers use rise from $23.66 to $60.20 for a 35-pound container over the past year.

Seattle’s Essential Baking Co. has reluctantly raised its prices across the board, and sales and marketing director Anna Li is dreading talk of wheat going even higher. Essential only uses flour from wheat grown organically, which can be tough to find as wheat buyers snap up whatever they can find to send overseas. Independent bakeries are kicking around the idea of banding together to negotiate better prices, she said.

“This is the staff of life and it’s something that we all in this country kind of take for granted,” Li said. “It makes that whole concept of Marie Antoinette ‘let them eat cake’ have a whole new meaning.”

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/foodwine/2004290947_wheat19.html

Ground Breaking Health Freedom Action: Call in the FTC!

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

Our highly innovative Citizens Petition asks the FTC to use its powers to prevent false and misleading advertising in order to STOP THE VACCINE INDUSTRY FROM SAYING THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE, EFFECTIVE OR PROVEN METHODS OF PREVENTING DISEASE AND PROMOTING HEALTH. Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=507) to read this ground breaking legal approach to stopping the vaccine madness.

A Citizens Petition is a legal assault on the US Government to force it to take the desired action. If the FTC does hold the hearings we ask for and take the desired actions, well and good. If it does not, that means we have “exhausted our administrative remedies” and the case is ripe (as they say) for Federal Court.

Once we have an FTC Docket Number for this Citizens Petition, it’s your turn. “Mouse Warriors” be prepared! Then you can sign it and pour forth a tsunami of grassroots support for changing the terrain on which the battle for vaccination freedom is fought from our bodies to our laws! But that will cost money so when you sign, we will ask you to make a “War Chest” donation (tax deductible, as always, of course) of at least $10.

Our first Citizens Petition on illegal US/Codex “HARMonization” and Dietary Supplements has nearly 200,000 sign-ones! But, to be honest, we made a mistake: since we did not ask for your financial support when you signed it, we do not now have the money to take it to Federal Court. We’ve learned and we are smarter now. With our new Citizens Petition, however, we will build the war chest as we build the number of people who join the Citizens Petition. Can you sign if you do not donate to the War Chest? Sure. Do we need the War Chest filled? You bet! It’s another way to protect and expand health freedom. We think it has great potential to end the vaccine lies since the FTC successfully took on the tobacco industry and other giants in the past in similar situations. Either way, we are building a case for Health Freedom in a novel and powerful way.

We’ll let you know as soon as we’re ready to start that tsunami of netroots support and filling that War Chest. Watch for it.

Thanks for your continuing activism.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Your Free Thank You Gift

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

In the health freedom battle, grass roots size and activity level is crticially important. The New Media grass roots is known as “netroots”.
Right now, Natural Solutions Foundation is the largest and most effective health freedom voice. But we need many more voices in the netroots community and you are our key to finding them!

We need to add more people to our “netroots” mailing list so that our grassroots, netroots voice becomes louder and louder and louder. The grassroots need to roar loud enough to protect our rights so when people receive our emails, they take action! So here is our way of saying “Thank you” for helping us to grow the netroots list: Www.Organics4U.org (www.Organics4U.org) is a fantastic resource of healthy and health producing products. Every purchase helps to support the Natural Solutions Foundation and you get a 40% tax deduction on most purchases. So sign up 10 people for our Health Freedom eAlerts (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=187“>http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=187) and we’ll say “Thank You” with a $10 gift certificate for our Health Freedom store, www.Organics4U.org. (No unwanted sign-ups, of course – ask these people for permission before you sign them up!)

Sign up 100 people and we’ll send you a $100 “Thank you” certificate. And for the person who signs up the most people by March 31, we’ve got a “thank you” certificate of $200 waiting for you!

Your purchases of organic products from www.Organics4U.org are good for you and good for the health freedom movement since the profits from these sales are another way for us to generate the funds that we need! To get these “thank you” certificates:

Just send us an email to dr.laibow@gmail.com telling us how many people you’ve signed up (please include their names and email addresses) and we’ll send out your Thank You certificate by email. Write “Alerts” as the subject and we’ll keep track of how many people you sign up. We’ll track how many new names are being added to our database and you’ll see a gift certificate in your email box!

Remember, though, despite the fantastic forward movement gained from that trip, we still have a very serious shortfall from our last Codex trip (Africa) and still need your generous and continuing financial support (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189).

Thank you for being an active force for change. Thank you, too, for building the netroots community to protect health freedom for all of us.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

GM Files: US Organic Food in Jeopardy Due to GM Crop Contamination

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

U.S. organic food industry fears GMO contamination

Mar 12, 2008
By Carey Gillam

KANSAS CITY, Missouri (Reuters) – Widespread contamination of U.S. corn, soybeans and other crops by genetically engineered varieties is threatening the purity of organic and natural food products and driving purveyors of such specialty products to new efforts to protect their markets, industry leaders said this week.

A range of players, from dairy farmers to natural food retailers, are behind an effort to introduce testing requirements and standards for certification aimed at keeping contamination at bay. That goal is rapidly becoming harder, however, as planting of biotech corn, soybeans, and other crops expands across the United States.

“Now there is a real shortage of organic grain for animal husbandry and dairy operations,” said Organic Consumers Association national director Ronnie Cummins. “People are having to be real careful.”

Proponents of the plan are rolling it out this week at an industry meeting in Anaheim, California, seeking to get the entire organic and natural foods industry to agree on testing and standard certifications. Companies that get certified will be allowed to use a seal designating as much on their products.

“We think we can keep the contamination from getting worse by putting safeguards in place so people who want to choose to eat organic products free of genetic contamination can do so,” said Michael Funk, CEO of United Natural Foods, which is backing the initiative. “The longer we delay … the more challenging it is going to be.”

Biotech crops, primarily corn, soybeans, cotton and canola, have genes that have been manipulated to express specific traits, most commonly a resistance to herbicide, which helps farmers. Biotech developers such as Monsanto Co patent the crop technology and tightly control use of the seed.

But mixing of biotech crops and conventional crops can occur during many phases of harvest, storage and shipment of grain, and drifting pollen and other natural forces can also contaminate crops while they are still in the fields.

Indeed, contamination of conventional crops by biotech crops has been reported around the world. There were 39 cases of crop contamination in 23 countries in 2007, and more than 200 in 57 countries over the last 10 years, according to biotech critic Greenpeace International.

Contamination of corn is the biggest concern for those trying to sell biotech-free food. Corn is not only used in human food but is also used to feed livestock, meaning organic beef and dairy farmers must ensure their animals are fed corn that is free of contamination.

That has become more difficult as biotech corn acres have expanded in the United States. In 2007, an estimated 73 percent of the 92.9 million acres of U.S. corn planted were biotech, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The USDA has a set of national standards for foods labeled “organic” as part of its marketing service, but the industry players seeking independent testing said the USDA has not gone far enough to require organic and natural foods are free from biotech contamination.

Organic dairy farmer Albert Straus, who started testing corn fed to his 300-head dairy herd more than a year ago, and found about one-third had been contaminated, now tests every lot of grain he buys.

“I started to test our products to see if there was an issue or not. It turned out there was an issue,” said Straus. He is now adding a label to his dairy products to alert consumers to the extra level of caution. “There is so much contamination,” he said.

GM Files: Industrial GM Potato Denied EU Approval for 2008

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Amflora potato: not this year

March 12, 2008
GMO Compass

(March 12, 2008) Genetically modified potatoes will not be cultivated commercially in the European Union this season. Voting members of the EU Commission have delayed approval of the “Amflora” variety. Effectively, this results in the prohibition of its planting in 2008.

Intended for industrial uses, e.g., the manufacture of paper and adhesives, the Amflora potato has been genetically modified to produce amylopectin starch exclusively.

The Amflora potato was developed by BASF and an application for its approval for cultivation was submitted in 2003. Subsequently, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) conducted a scientific safety assessment. Upon the conclusion of tests in 2005, the EFSA declared the Amflora line to be identical to conventional potatoes with regard to its effect on the environment.

On the basis of this declaration, the EU Commission recommended the approval of Amflora for cultivation within the Union. However, this recommendation was unable in 2007 to find support from a qualified majority of ministerial representatives of Member States in the European Council. As foreseen by EU law, ultimate responsibility for approval then was conferred to the Commission. This decision now has been delayed.

Spokespeople for BASF had expressed hope for cultivation in 2008. However, due to various factors which include yearly planning of crops and the early registration of the intention to plant genetically modified lines, approval would have been needed in February at the latest.
postmaster is offline Reply With Quote
postmaster
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by postmaster
Reply