Archive for 2008

GM Files: Australian Groups Seek GM Ban Until “Safe Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Rudd faces joint anti-GM campaign (Australia)

theage.com
Katharine Murphy
March 15, 2008

THE Federal Government faces a concerted campaign from a new coalition of health, environment and farm groups to ban genetically modified crops and foods until they are proved safe beyond reasonable doubt.

More than 700 groups and individuals have signed a letter urging Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and senior ministers to meet a group of 20 experts to examine the health risks associated with GM foods.

The fresh attempt to exert political pressure at the national level follows a controversial decision by Victoria and NSW to join Queensland in ending their bans on GM crops.

Agriculture Minister Tony Burke has also decided to endorse more research on GM as part of a strategy to help farmers deal with the challenges of climate change.

Before the election, Labor’s previous agriculture spokesman, Senator Kerry O’Brien, had been lukewarm towards the industry.

The new federal campaign is being led by wealthy Adelaide businessman Peter Fenwick, who has urged Labor to maintain its pre-election stance on genetic engineering.

Yesterday, Mr Fenwick said he believed Mr Burke was “relatively uninformed” about the risks associated with GM, and had been “captured by his department”.

Mr Rudd has been urged to:

â–  Stop the release of any GM crops until he has met scientific experts to hear the latest evidence.

â–  Order an immediate product safety recall on all GM crops, GM foods and GM animal feed, and ban their importation into Australia.

â–  Overhaul the regulatory bodies with responsibility for policing the industry, and override the states that have lifted their GM bans.

Groups involved in the campaign include the Public Health Association of Australia, the Australian Milk Producers of Australia, Biological Farmers of Australia, a think tank associated with the Catholic Church, plus a host of organic and biodynamic food companies including Pureharvest.
postmaster is offline Reply With Quote

GM Files: Roundup Ready SugarBeets Approved in US, Injunction Sought to Prevent Crop

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
ASGA responds to court challenge of Roundup Ready sugarbeets

By DALE HILDEBRANT, Farm & Ranch Guide

GRAND FORKS, N.D. – Once the word was out that the USDA and its Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) had given the green light to Roundup Ready sugarbeets, it didn’t take long for a coalition of organizations to seek a federal court injunction asking for a delay until further studies were completed.

A lawsuit was filed in San Francisco, Calif., asking the USDA and APHIS be required to study the impacts on various segments of society, including business, environmental and consumer rights, before lifting the restrictions on Roundup Ready sugarbeets.

During the International Sugarbeet Institute, which was held in Grand Forks on March 5-6, Institute secretary Don Lilleboe read a statement from the American Sugarbeet Growers Associa-tion in response to the recently filed lawsuit.

In part, the statement said, “The plaintiffs have taken no action to try to impact the planting of Roundup Ready sugarbeets in 2008 and we anticipate that growers will proceed as originally contemplated, for the 2008 growing season.

“At the appropriate time we anticipate the sugarbeet growers and processors, along with the technology and seed companies, will ask the court to allow them to join in the lawsuit in support of USDA and APHIS.

“Barring any action by the plaintiffs in the next few weeks, the current parties to the litigation are scheduled to appear in court on May 10 for a routine scheduling conference.”

Those parties that are bringing the action against USDA and APHIS in-clude the Center for Food Safety, Sierra Club, Organic Seed Alliance and High Mowing Organic Seeds.

Similar action in the same San Francisco court resulted in Roundup Ready alfalfa being taken off the market until further studies are completed, and at this time the product hasn’t been allowed to re-enter the market.

Since many of the sugarbeet acres will have been planted before the initial court date on May 10, sugar industry officials see little impact on the 2008 planting plans.

This is welcome news to the sugarbeet seed companies, since they switched a large portion of their seed production program over to Roundup Ready seed and away from conventional seed production.

If Roundup Ready seeds had been banned, it might have caused a shortage of conventional sugarbeet seed.

Earlier this winter, American Crystal Sugar officials had predicted that approximately 50 percent of their acreage in 2008 would be in the form of Roundup Ready beets, and the Minn-Dak Cooperative had set a maximum of 50 percent of the acreage could be planted to the new technology seed.

However, in southern Minnesota, it was estimated only 15 percent of the acreage would be planted to Roundup Ready beets.

The plaintiffs are claiming that Roundup Ready sugarbeets could cause crop contamination, since most of the sugarbeet seeds are produced in Oregon’s Willamette Valley, where organic chard and table beet seeds are also produced.

In addition, the group is claiming that adding another crop to the Roundup Ready group will only add to the glyphosate weed resistance problem and they question genetically-engineered sugar making its way into the nation’s food supply.

“At a time when consumers are facing multiple food safety challenges, we don’t need more corporations messing with our food supply,” said the Sierra Club’s Neil Carman.

However, earlier this winter, American Crystal agronomist Dr. Alan Cattanach told growers attending a meeting in Fargo that the sugar is the same, whether it comes from a Roundup Ready sugarbeet or a conventional beet.

“Nutritionally it’s the same and the chemical composition is the same,” Cattanach said. “The Sugar Industry Biotech Council took 40 samples from around the world; cane sugar samples, beet sugar samples, organic sugar samples, samples from the U.S. and many foreign countries and had them analyzed by an independent laboratory and found that all of these sugar samples have exactly the same analytical profile.

The sugar is the same, regardless of the source. And the pulp and the molasses are the same, whether from a biotech or conventional beet.”
postmaster is offline Reply With Quote
postmaster
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by postmaster
Reply

GM Files: Panel Supports Ban on GM Taro

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Panel Backs GMO Taro Ban

* By ILIMA LOOMIS
Maui News, March 14, 2008
Straight to the Source

WAILUKU – A resolution urging a hold on research involving genetic modification of taro was advanced Wednesday by the County Council Public Works and Facilities Committee.

The resolution supports a bill pending before the state Legislature that would put a 10-year moratorium on developing, testing and growing genetically modified taro plants. Supporters in the audience, many of them taro farmers from East Maui, applauded as the committee voted to recommend the resolution with a 5-0 vote.

“It is time for us to put the brakes on,” said Council Member Mike Victorino, co-chairman of the Public Works Committee.

The moratorium proposal, Senate Bill 958, was approved by the Senate and is pending in the House Agriculture Committee, which has scheduled a hearing at 9 a.m. Wednesday in the State Capitol auditorium.

At the council committee session, taro farmer Steve Hookano said a lack of flowing water and other environmental challenges were the causes of disease and parasites affecting crops.

“It’s not the taro’s fault,” he said.

Waving a petition supporting the ban signed by other East Maui residents, he feared experimentation could threaten the genetic diversity of the plant.

“We don’t know the risks and the benefits,” he said.

“We’re living in Hawaii – not a science lab,” said Kevin Namahoe-Carvalho.

He noted that taro had a cultural and religious significance to Hawaiians in addition to being a staple food.

“We just don’t see why anyone thinks they can make it better,” he said.

Opponents of the ban say there is no evidence genetically altered foods pose a risk to people. They also say genetic modification could help taro survive pests and diseases that have been threatening crops.

Council Member Danny Mateo, who holds the council’s Molokai seat, acknowledged his home island was “divided” over the issue. But ultimately he agreed there should be a “time out” on experiments with taro.

“It’s about the spirituality, it’s about the religion, it’s about the culture that’s being attacked,” he said.

SB 958 would prohibit research involving recombinant DNA technology and specifies that the moratorium would not prevent traditional methods of breeding and hybridization of taro.

The Maui County Council resolution in support of SB 958 is expected to go to the full council for a vote April 4.

Polio, the Disease Vaccines Supposedly Eliminated, Actually Caused by DDT, Other Pesticides

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

“Stand for science by all means. That is why you should reject vaccines by the way, instead of accept them.”
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/311032.shtml

Polio “Disappearance” Only Statistical Medical Fraud: depopulation covert op via vaccines

This article deconstructs the politics around creating the so-called ‘polio vaccine success’ which is still widely heralded as a success. However, any simple cursory analysis of its history and the effects of the vaccine show that it was a dismal failure and that any success was based on medical fraud of reclassification of expanded cases of polio (filed away under other diseases) to make it appear that polio “went away.” The World Health Organization does this to the present, despite skyrocketing ‘polio’ everywhere. Widely known by the researchers even at the time, this is the story of the cover-up of the century: within this cover up, can be traced the expansion of using knowingly contaminated vaccines for depopulation everywhere.

POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISTICIAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS AND PESTICIDE VECTORS THAT CAUSED IT. POLIO SYMPTOMS CAN BE MYCOPLASMA AS WELL.

POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY A COVER FOR SPREADING KNOWINGLY CONTAMINATED VACCINES WORLDWIDE–FROM ONLY US/UK LABS THAT KNOWINGLY USED MONKEY VIRUS CONTAMINATED SUPPLIES, AND THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS W.H.O (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION). W.H.O. ‘VACCINES’ TESTED IN INDIA IN 2003 WERE FOUND TO BE LACED WITH INFERTILITY AND STERILITY AGENTS.

Polio Special Parts 1-4:
PART 1: A shot in the dark

Janine Roberts
from the UK Magazine The Ecologist (2004)

POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISTICAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS

Date Published: 01/05/2004
Author: Janine Roberts

“Polio is a devastating disease; the preferred method for fighting it is vaccination. Yet there is a mass of historic evidence that suggests it is not caused by a virus but by industrial and agricultural pollution…”

–AT THE AUTHOR’S REQUEST, THE REPOSTING OF THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS ARCHIVE–

Scientists: They’re Not Always Right. Vaccines and BioWarfare

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based campaigns, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org


Scientists – they’re not always right

Date Published: 22/05/2002
Author: Peter Mansfield

Why do we assume scientists have all the answers? And what do we do if those scientists are the problem?

Last week I was asked by a group of anti-vivisectionists to discuss on radio a WHO report about the use of primates in medical research. I declined, despite strongly held views. Sound bites may be the oxygen of broadcasters, but they make for very unsatisfactory debates.

It always comes down to what you choose to assume. No science is possible without making some assumptions from which questions are framed for the scientist to answer. To start with, we assume that the methods of science are appropriate for answering questions.

That in itself may not be a problem. The trouble is that we let scientists ask the questions as well as answer them. That is unwise, because scientists tend to ignore the big picture in favour of their special interests. Inevitably, they frame questions which they will enjoy tackling. They then invariably find that the answer, at least in part, is the need for more research.

In consequence, we find ourselves endorsing a huge haze of abstract ideas we do not understand. We, our politicians and commentators avoid challenging these ideas, lest we appear foolish. The scientific establishment, meanwhile, seldom admits to the fragility of its ideas – far less its assumptions. It has awarded itself a god-like status, and we tolerate that.

But what if scientists’ undeclared assumptions are in fact false? In that case, any questions and answers that follow from them will merely compound the initial falsehood.

Take research on primates – or any other animals, come to that. The initial assumption goes like this: human rights supersede animal rights. It matters not that the human disease being researched might result from self-abuse – the wrong food, or too little exercise, for instance. No, we conduct research on animals to find cures for our self-inflicted illnesses, instead of looking at what we are doing wrong so as to stop these illnesses from occurring in the first place.

Secondly, we assume that similar genetic codes mean similar animals. Yet the few genes that distinguish us from other mammals cannot possibly account for the striking contrasts in form, function and talent. Genes are the same in all the cells of one individual, yet different cells within the same animal have radically different forms and functions. What makes one cell part of your eye, another your heart and another your brain? Hi-tech gene-speak only camouflages our ignorance.

OSTRICH MENTALITY
In September 1997 The Lancet – an internationally-respected journal of medical science – published an analysis of the findings of a series of scientific trials of homoeopathic medicine. It set out to check whether the apparent benefits of homoeopathic medicine were actually just examples of the placebo effect – in plain language, self-delusion.

The result was positive. The studies found that homoeopathic remedies did indeed have a net positive effect after self-delusion, bias and all other confounding factors had been carefully ruled out. The paper then survived review by at least two other experts before The Lancet agreed to publish.

Even then, in the same edition The Lancet published not one but two leading articles by placebo sceptics. One simply refused to accept the result at face value – ultimately, because ‘the “infinite dilutions” of the agents used cannot possibly produce any effect’. The other conceded that ‘there is enough in the study to [ask] for good controlled trials’, but doubted whether ‘resources [for] these trials can be justified when a rational basis for… homoeopathy… is lacking’.

In other words, even though a system of medicine has effectively been acquitted of quackery in the highest available scientific court, it remains in the dock because the scientists don’t know how it works.

That’s as philosophical as it gets. Fixed mind-sets and vested interests are the usual obstacles. The UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) is, for example, about to publish its thoughts on how to fill the embarrassing black hole in research on the fluoridation of water.

A fabric of dogma, constructed through 70 years of tendentious research, hailed water fluoridation as the best way to correct inequalities in dental health. That dogma began [you can guess where!] in the US with the then reasonable assumption that people only obtained fluoride from water. But Americans don’t drink much tea, which is a rich source. And then toothpaste became fluoridated anyway, and food items began to be processed and manufactured with fluoridated water.

Now, the facts are that many people in non-fluoridated areas consume as much fluoride as those with fluoridated water supplies. Sometimes they consume a lot more flouride than could ever possibly be good for them. This effectively rubbishes all the studies that compared populations simply on the basis of the fluoride content of their water supply.

Yet it took a systematic scientific review and about five years to force dental academics – their banners long nailed to fluoridation – to take into account personal consumption of fluoride from all sources. We have yet to see if this concession finally makes it into the MRC report.

I can’t help noting the parallels between the fluoridation saga and the way the MMR story is unfolding. Creating MMR was little more than an act of technical cleverness. But it also exceeded nature, and was, therefore, wrong in principle. But so little do its protagonists care for public opinion that they intend to compound the error by adding chicken pox vaccine to MMR. It will then become a quadruple hit. A pathologist friend of mine reacted to this proposal with dismay: ‘Two immuno-suppressant viruses in the same vaccine? Whose bright idea was that?’ Were he a Pharmaceutical industry employee instead of a private practitioner, he wouldn’t have to ask.

This sort of ‘science’ abuses both the resources and trust of the public. As Richard Asher said: ‘If you can’t explain a complex technicality to your landlady’s daughter, you don’t understand it yourself.’ Nor are you earning your corn.

MORE DETAIL ON BIOWARFARE VECTOR OF VACCINES AND CANCER VIRUSES KNOWLEDGE

Frankly I think all the data says it very clearly. Merely from above: [ http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/311032.shtml]

First, From 1911, US military vaccines made manditory. Psychopathic USA elites (you know, the people who brought you German eugenics and the USSR funding simultaneously*) think that with all the information they got about their own ‘quarantine experiments’ in the late 1800s in the USA (see below***), they were ready to spread the disease?

Second, it states in comments that the flu pandemic started in the USA among troops ready to be sent into Europe, and thus, ready to be sent (intentionally? likely) to infect the entire world like an overglorified bunch of tainted mosquitoes. It further states that this was ignored at the time, for some “unknown” purpose, though they were sent overseas anyway. The U.S. in later wars has experimented on its troops with unknown vaccines, likely for “perfecting” various debilitations by design–since all these vaccines that were used both in Bush I’s Gulf War and Bush II’s Gulf War Ongoing were entirely unauthorized and untested by the way. The military operation makes a nice social environment of command and control to test out illegal human experimentation.

Third, it states in other comments about the influenza as well as the treatment frameworks themselves combined being responsible for high mortality since other treatment ideas that are far less destructive and far more naturopathic (and thus no money to be made in them by the pharma-companies that have always been conected to eugenics interests**) led to much better survival rates.

citations:

*

Wall Street and Hitler, by Antony Sutton;
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, by Antony Sutton,
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-bolshevik-rev.html

free copies at a website I have nothing to do with, they are only free here.

**

War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race, by Edwin Black;

State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS, by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.

Home

MORE ON VACCINES AS THE VECTOR IN PLANNED HOLOCAUSTS:

***

The History of the Development of AIDS–AND THE HISTORY OF EUGENICS/MYCOPLASMA ALWAYS CONNECTED, FROM 1889 WHEN MYCOPLASMA FIRST ISOLATED

Chapter Excerpt from “State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS”
by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.

The true history of the origin of AIDS can be traced throughout the 20th Century and back to 1878. On April 29 of that year the United States passed a “FEDERAL QUARANTINE ACT”.

The United States began a significant effort to investigate “causes” of epidemic diseases. In 1887, the effort was enhanced with the mandate of the U.S. “LABORATORY OF HYGIENE”. This lab was run by Dr. Joseph J. Kinyoun, a deep rooted-racist, who served the eugenics movement with dedication.

Two years later, 1889, we were able to identify “mycoplasmas”, a transmissible agent, that is now found at the heart of human diseases, including (AIDS) HIV.

In 1893, we strengthened the Federal Quarantine Act and [LO AND BEHOLD, SUSPICIOUSLY] suddenly there was an explosion of polio. [THAT COULD BE TEST MANAGED AND DATA GATHERED THANKS TO THE LAWS QUICKLY PUT IN PLACE BEFOREHAND.] [This mycoplasma=’polio’ symptom is a vector that The Ecologist’s article fails to go into by the way, even though it was mentioned that the symptoms of polio get thrown around in multiple classifications and are attitubed to many different things. “Polio” merely as the same type of operation as the AIDS’s “grab bag” category of later 20th century?]

In 1898, we knew we could use mycoplasma to cause epidemics, because we were able to do so in cattle, and we saw it in tobacco plants. [Then, we see wider cattle experimentation perhaps, as mentioned in the early 1900s where the US Government killed off all those cattle with vaccine programs…to see if they could….]

In 1899, the U.S. Congress began investigating “leprosy in the United States”.

In 1902, We organized a “Station for Experimental Evolution” and we were able to identify diseases of an ethnic nature.

In 1904, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in horses.

In 1910, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in fowl/birds.

In 1911, Vaccines made mandatory in the US military.

In 1917, we formed the “Federation of the American Society for Experimental Biology” (FASEB).

In 1918, the influenza virus killed millions of unsuspecting. It was a flu virus modified with a bird mycoplasma for which human primates had no “acquired immunity”. It started in the USA military camps in the American Midwest, and was spread to Europe. Caused more deaths as a percentage of population than Europe’s Black Death bubonic plague of 1348-50s.

In 1921, lead eugenics philosopher, Betrand Russell, publicly supported the “necessity for “organized” plagues” against the Black population.

In 1931, we secretly tested African Americans and we tested AIDS in sheep.

In 1935, we learned we could crystallize the tobacco mycoplasma, and it would remain infectious.

In 1943, we officially began our bio-warfare program. Shortly thereafter, we were finding our way to New Guinea to study mycoplasma in humans.

In 1945, before the U.S. dropped bombs dropped on civilians of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Atomic Energy Commission writes a classified report on a covert human test of a “small atomic bomb” on Black Americans at Port Chicago, California. It was intentionally detonated in the middle of the night, when only Black American “dispensible” porters would be in the harbor. The Atomic Energy Commission refuses to say why it was flown there to conduct the investigation and report, of what was publically was discussed as only an “accidental munitions explosion.”

In 1945, we witnessed the greatest influx of foreign scientists in history into the U.S. biological program. Operation Paperclip will live in infamy as one of the darkest programs of a twisted parallel government fixated on genocide.

In 1946, the United States Navy hired Dr. Earl Traub, a notorious racist biologist.
A May appropriations hearing confirms the existence of a “secret” biological weapon.
Same year, future pharmaceutical czar George Merck reported to the US Secretary of War, that he’d managed to weaponise the toxin extracted from the Brucella bacterium and to isolate it into an indestructible crystalline form using only the DNA particles–exactly the same technique of crystallization for the tobacco mycoplasma in 1935. Merck of course was making the first polio vaccines as well…that were knowingly contaminated with the monkey virus.

In 1948, we know that the United States confirmed the endorsement of “devising a scheme” in which to address the issue of overpopulation in certain racial groups. State Department’s George McKennan’s memo will forever illuminate the eugenics mendacity necessary for genocide of millions of innocent people.

In 1949, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson isolates the VISNA virus. Visna is man made and shares some “unique DNA” with HIV. See, Proceedings of the United States, NAS, Vol. 92, pp. 3283 – 7, (April 11, 1995).

In 1950s, aerial spraying of the Brucella crystals via chemtrails was deployed on Chinese and Korean populations during the Korean War (a war actually run as a “police action” from the United Nations, not the United States, and the United Nations person in charge of organizing police action aginst USSR incursions into South Korea was…surprisingly a USSR general.) Many U.S. veterans of the war later developed Multiple Sclerosis. The army recognized that the MS was Brucella-related and paid the veterans compensation. Although the Brucella micoplasma can lay dormant for decades, it was learned that it can be usefully triggered by vaccines. That set some people to thinking…

In 1951, we now know our government conducted its first virus attack on African Americans. Crates in Pennsylvania were tainted to see how many Negro crate handlers in Virginia would acquire the placebo virus.. They were also experimentally infecting sheep and goats. According to author Eva Snead, they also held their first world conference on an AIDS-like virus.

In 1954, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson publishes his first paper on Visna virus and establishes himself as the “Grandfather of the AIDS virus.” He will encounter competition from Dr. Carlton Gajdusek.

In 1955, they were able to artificially assemble the tobacco mosaic virus. Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program.

In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of “Special Operation-X.” (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962.

By 1960, Nikita Kruschev had been let in on the biological weapon. His 1960 statement will long reflect the arrogance of the secret blend of communism and democracy. The two countries would go to a November 1972 agreement to cull the Black Population.

In 1961, scientist Haldor Thomar publishes that viruses cause cancer. In 1995, he and Carlton Gajdusek informed the National Academy of Sciences that “the study of visna in sheep would be the best test for candidate anti-HIV drugs.”

In 1962, under the cover of cancer research, the United States charts a path to commit premeditated murder, the “Special Virus” program begins on February 12th. Dr. Len Hayflick sets up a U.S. mycoplasma laboratory at [Skull and Bones founded] Stanford University. Many believe the “Special Virus” program began in November 1961 with a Phizer contract.

Beginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the “Special Virus” program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. [Hershey, PA, was an entirely privately and corporate run city, run by Mr. Hershey, thus without any public government so it was a politically safe test site for mass experimentation.] The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.

In 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.

In 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.

In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.

In 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the “Population Czar.” Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.

In 1971, Progress Report #8 is issued. The flowchart (pg. 61) will forever resolve the true laboratory birth origin of AIDS. Eventually the Special Virus program will issue 15 reports and over 20,000 scientific papers. The flowchart links every scientific paper, medical experiment and U.S. contract. The flowchart would remain “missing” until 1999. World scientists were stunned. The flowchart will gain in significance throughout the 21st Century. It is also clear the experiments conducted under Phase IV-A of the flowchart are our best route to better therapy and treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. The first sixty pages of progress report #8 of the Special Virus program prove conclusively the specific goal of the program.

By June 1977, the Special Virus program had produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. The AIDS virus was attached as complement to vaccines sent to Africa and Manhattan. However, because of the thoroughness of authors, like Dr. Robert E. Lee, we also learn the Stanford Mycoplasma Laboratory issues one of the first papers with AIDS in the title. “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States.” The primary scientist, Dr. Thomas Merigan, was a “consultant” to the Special Virus program.

Progress Report # 8 at 104 – 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo can not explain why he excluded his role as a “project officer” for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo’s early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The “research logic” is irrefutable evidence of a federal “Manhattan-style project” to develop a “contagious” cancer that “selectively” kills.

Dr. Gallo’s 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement.

Progress Report #8 at 273 – 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild.

Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would “suddenly emerge” from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made.

In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.

In 1973, we find that world scientist, Garth Nicolson reports on his project, “Role of the Cell Surface in Escape From Immunological Surveillance.” His report is accompanied by seven published papers. Dr. Nicolson worked in conjunction with the Special Virus program from 1972 until 1978. Dr. Nicolson is considered by some to be Dr. Gallo’s “West Coast” counterpart. It is strongly held that because of Dr. Nicolson, Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Luc Montagnier would secretly meet in Southern California to coordinate what they would and would not say about the special virus development program.

In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania.  The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.

In 1975, [unelected and entirely appointed] President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200. Dick Cheney is made Ford’s Chief of Staff. Ford’s Secretary of Defense is Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld helps to bring Cheney on board the Ford White House.

In 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population. The background on Carter: the appointed Ford’s appointed VP is Nelson Rockefeller–who almost becomes President in a coup within a year or so after three assassination attempts on Ford’s life. When that didn’t work, the next elected president, Carter, has his whole Administration full of personal appointees of David Rockefeller, called “Trilaterials”. David Rockefeller is the early 1970s organizer of the Trilaterial Commission, an internationalist “global harmonization” policy organization between The U.S. , Japan, and Europe. All Trilaterals are personally picked by David Rockefeller. Carter, along with over 20 of his appointees to his administration, are Trilaterals. George H. W. Bush is appointed as CIA Director by the unelected and strictly appointed Ford White House. Carter removes Bush from this position. George H. W. Bush was a Trilateral. Trilaterial Commission organizer David Rockefeller and Ford appointed VP Nelson Rockefeller (who as Governor of NY State, with his financier brother David Rockefeller, built the WTCs) are both in turn brothers of John D. Rockfeller, III, the “Population Czar.” George H. W. Bush has been connected to the Rockefellers since the early 1900s, through railroad connections via the Harrimans.

In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the “experimental” hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people. This government will never be able to repay the people for the social rape, humiliation and out right prejudice people with HIV/AIDS face on a daily basis. The men in the shadows of the AIDS curtain accurately calculated that you would not care if only Blacks and gays are dying. In fact you don’t care that nearly a half million Gulf War veterans are encumbered with something contagious. Soon there will be no more Black people and a confused military, older White people will start suddenly dying and you still won’t get it. Be here now for us, give us a chance to be there for you.

Suddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On November 4, 1999, the U.S. White House announced,…. “Within a period as short as five years, all new infections of HIV in the United States will be African American….” At some point our experts must be allowed to begin the interface process of allowing the history of this virus program to count. It is ludicrous and preposterous to fail to review the U.S. virus program in which to elucidate the etiology of AIDS.

More of the history of the secret virus program can be found in the archives of Dr. John B. Moloney. A review of the files under Dr. Moloney’s name would further pinpoint additional dates and records consistent with one of the greatest hunts, capture and proliferation of disease in the history of the human race. We have found the missing link. It is the guts of the research logic of a federal program that seeks to kill. We have found a curtain of AIDS. We can identify some of the people who work in the shadows of the curtain. Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Garth Nicolson must lead us in review. In light of the attack mechanisms available in which to inhibit AIDS, it is time that not another person be stricken with this relic, synthetic mycoplasma chimera.

Help those of us who are still here to realize full and contributory lives. We are all one people.

In May of 1987 the austere Times of London reported on its front page that the smallpox vaccine administered by the World Health Organization had triggered AIDS. 100 million vaccinated Africans were at risk. Areas with the largest amount of inoculations showed the greatest concentrations of AIDS cases. Robert Gallo was quoted in the article as endorsing the figures and stating that, “AIDS researchers…will keep their mouths shut because they are paid to do so.”

In 1992 WHO director David Heymann stated that, “The origin of AIDS is of no importance to science today.”

In 1995 the Catholic charitable organization Human Life International accused the WHO of attempting population control in Africa and elsewhere.

On September 28, 1998 Boyd Graves filed suit against the United States for the “creation”, “production” and “proliferation” of AIDS. On November 7, 2000, the appeals court agreed with the lower court and held AIDS bioengineering as “frivolous.” The world continues to wait for the court to rule on the resubmitted issues. The court can not continue to simply brush aside our experts and the government’s flowchart.

In April 2000 the Observer newspaper reported that the pharmaceutical leviathan GlaxoSmithKline sponsored experiments on children at Incarnation Children’s Center in New York City. Children as young as four were given multi-drug cocktails. In other experiments, six-month old babies were injected with double doses of a measles vaccine. More than 100 orphans and babies were used in 36 experiments.

March 2003, Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and dean of a Nigerian university took samples of the latest WHO vaccine to India for analysis. Serious contaminants were found including sterility agents.

2004: This sort of experimentation has occurred with increasing frequency. Last year, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency received $2.1 million from the American Chemistry Council to conduct studies on children from impoverished families in Duval County, Florida. The children will be exposed to a variety of known toxins over a two year period. The study will determine how chemicals are absorbed, ingested and inhaled by children ranging in age from infants to 3 year olds. For taking part in the study, families will receive $970 and a tee-shirt.

December 2004: The Times also reported last December that Gulf War Syndrome had been positively linked to vaccines. More than 100,000 veterans currently suffer from the syndrome contracted in 1991 during Desert Storm. 20,000 veterans have died so far.

Boyd Graves writes: I have been asked to give my perspective with regard to the federal program MK-NAOMI . MK-NAOMI is the code for the development of AIDS. The “MK” portion stands for the two co-authors of the AIDS virus, Robert Manaker and Paul Kotin. The “NAOMI” portion stands for “Negroes are Only Momentary Individuals.” The U.S. government continues to orchestrate silence from the very top echelons of the Congress and military. At present there is no accountability. The good people will ultimately create a tsunami of public outrage. We can not allow the state an autocratic right to govern outside of the Constitution. Our society is structured to hide crimes committed by the state, while punishing citizens for minor indiscretions. Their strategy focuses on the general confusion they can create via manipulation of the media. They are very good at what they do. We must become more focused in our continued presentation of the flowchart. The flowchart is the absolute missing link in proving the existence of a coordinated research program to develop a cancer virus that depletes the immune system. New diseases do not create old illnesses.

This compilation of court documents and correspondence is the true effort of one man’s achievement in solving the mystery of the origin of AIDS. We have found the origin of AIDS, it is us.

http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/

Fortune Presents Gifts Not According To The Book
Luis de Gongora (1561-1627)

Fortune Presents Gifts Not According To The Book
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
What various paths are followed in distributing honours and possessions
She gives awards to some and penitent’s cloaks to others
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
Sometimes she robs the chief goatherd of his cottage and goatpen
And to whomever she fancies the lamest goat has born two kids
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
Because in a village a poor lad has stolen one egg
He swings in the sun and another gets away with a thousand crimes
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles