Archive for 2008

Gates: Bird Flu as a Weapon “Nutty”. Indonesian Health Minister Begs to Differ!

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Bird flu as biological weapon “nutty” idea, says Gates

JAKARTA (JP): United States Defense Secretary Robert Gates has denied allegations by Indonesia’s Health Minister Siti Fadilah Supari that his country is developing biological weapons frombird flu strains found in Indonesia.

“I think it’s the nuttiest idea I’ve ever heard,” Gates saidMonday after addressing his speech to the Indonesian Council onWorld Affairs at the Four Seasons Hotel, South Jakarta.

Siti’s book, It’s Time for the World to Change, Divine Hands Behind Bird Flu, alleges the U.S. and the World HealthOrganization are conspiring against developing countries by seizing control of bird flu samples.

The book says virus samples being sent to a laboratory in Los Alamos are under U.S military control.

After meeting with President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Defense Minister Juwono Sudarsono at the State Palace, Gates saidhe did not discuss the issue with the President.

“I respectfully and strongly disagree with the minister, andit is not true that the United States offered military equipmentif the book was withdrawn,” he said in response to allegations that the U.S would provide military aid for Indonesia as long as the English version of the book was withdrawn.

Presidential spokesman Dino Pati Djalal said any claim the U.S designed the virus as a biological weapon was a personal view of the minister and not the President.

U.S State Department spokeswoman Susan Stahl recently denied Siti’s claim.

Recently, Siti said she was pulling the English version of the book from distribution after less than a month, citing inaccuratetranslations as the main reason.

The book was launched on Feb. 6 and is a 182-page memoir recording Siti’s struggle to change the allegedly unfair virus sample sharing.

She claimed the system was not transparent and did not accommodate the needs of developing nations.

The Indonesian government decided to stop sharing virus samples early last year following a perceived leakage in the GISN as vaccine makers in developed countries could obtain samplessent by Indonesia to produce bird flu vaccines.

However, the government resumed sharing last week and sent 12samples to the Center for Disease Control and Protection in Atlanta, Georgia. (anw/dsy/**)

State Taking Custody of Children at Accelerating Rate. Why?

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

“babies are often taken into custody – a couple of times a week at the Royal Alex alone – and judgments are made in each case about necessary security measures.”

Who is your child’s custodian? You or the State? At one hospital in Canada, Royal Alexandra Hospital in Calgary Alberta, several children are taken into custody each week. Why? Are parents so dangerous to their Chidren or have the intrusive policies of the State become so astonishingly invasive that “several children” are taken away from their parents each week?

In the US, at least, what happens to these children is literally harrowing. Forced drugging, sexual abuse, emotional and physical abuse, separation from people who love them, perhaps starting with their parents and then often from foster care givers. What are we doing to our society? And why?

Could this increase have anything to do with the change perpetrated by the FDA to make children in foster care subjects for drug experimentation without the nicety of an informed consent signed by anyone? That means that the state is paid by drug companies for experimentation on the most vulnerable and most defenseless members of our society: children in foster care.

This lack of informed consent extends to prisoners, too. Could that be why the numbers of prisoners are increasing nearly exponentially in every state in the US?

If this is not the reason for these increases, I hope that someone can tell me what the real reason is.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Mom steals own baby
Takes one-day-old child from hospital without legal custody
By NICKI THOMAS AND GLENN KAUTH, SUN MEDIA

A communication breakdown may have allowed a 19-year-old mother to abduct her own child from hospital yesterday – but there are no problems with security measures, says a Capital Health official.

“This was not a random child abduction by a stranger. This is not something that should cause a lot of anxiety to other parents. This is a case that does happen very rarely when social services are involved,” said spokesman Steve Buick.

Just after 10 a.m. yesterday, police were alerted by staff at the Royal Alexandra Hospital that a woman had left the building with her one-day-old child, of whom she did not have legal custody.

Minutes later, the woman – who cannot be named under the Youth and Family Enhancement Act – boarded a bus heading toward Castledowns.

“She didn’t have anything on the baby except a blanket. We thought it was a doll,” said Arlene, who was on the bus with the woman and later called a social worker at the hospital when she became concerned about the mom’s behavior.

“I was thinking that it wasn’t a baby – the way she was holding it. It was almost like a rag doll in her arms,” said Arlene, who didn’t want her last name used.

She added the mom was very fidgety and seemed paranoid.

The mom got off the bus near 122 Avenue and 97 Street and took a cab to her home at the Evergreen Mobile Home Park, where police located her and the baby.

Children’s Services spokesman Heather Massel couldn’t say specifically why the mom had lost custody of the baby, but said an apprehension order is generally carried out when a parent is unable or unwilling to care for the child.

She said the baby is safe and in the care of children’s services. Buick said that babies are often taken into custody – a couple of times a week at the Royal Alex alone – and judgments are made in each case about necessary security measures.

“It’s hard to predict the way a new mom will react to the news that her baby is going to be taken into custody. Everybody involved makes their best judgment about how an individual mom will react and most of the time, that judgment is (that) it will be OK. Once in a blue moon, literally every few years, that judgment won’t work out the way that people had in mind and the mom will just react badly and run off with the baby,” he said, adding the last time this happened was six years ago.

Despite losing custody of her child, the mother was allowed regular access to the baby, said Buick.

“Her being with her baby was exactly as it should have been. The judgment about apprehension does not necessarily mean that the mom shouldn’t have any contact with her newborn baby,” he said.

Buick admitted there may have been a breakdown in communication between staff and social services regarding the apprehension order and Capital Health will be looking into what happened.

“In a busy unit like this with a number of patients going through it, it’s very possible that someone who had just come on shift didn’t know that this order had been made and may have given mom a wrong impression,” he said. “We should have been watching more closely than we were and if there’s any improvement we can make, we’ll look for how.

“The bottom line is there wasn’t any extra security required, so it wasn’t really a breach of the security measures. There’s no way that it would be good for this family or any other family for us to start putting armed guards outside every door in these units. This is a risk we have to manage and it’s a very, very tiny risk.”

Police will not be laying charges against the mother.
Got a News Tip?

Nutrition and Mental Illness

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

The author of this impassioned plea for nutritional strategies instead of pharmaceutical ones is right on target in my opinion. As a psychiatrist practicing drug free psychiatry and medicine for nearly 40 years, I have skepticism and scorn for psychiatry as a bogus diagnostic system designed to “pathologize” everyone, from as early as possible, for the purpose of making sure that everyone can be drugged. Psychiatrists are not usually aware of this motivation and corruption, but their education, and their mindless acquiescence in the nonsense drummed into them that they follow, regardless of the inherent contradictions in the information they are given make the good that lies within psychiatry – and psychiatrists – close to invisible.

Just say “NO!” to psychiatric drugs, “No, no, no!” and keep on saying “NO!” Find an orthomolecular (literally, correct molecules) physician or psychiatrist at http://www.orthomed.org/ or an organization like The American Academy of Environmental Medicine, hppt://www.AAEM.com, check out a page like http://www.laleva.org/eng/medicine_alternatives/orthomolecular_psychiatry.html, contact the Pfeiffer Treatment Center, http://www.hriptc.org/ or other reputable treatment options for yourself or a loved one.

Mental illness is painful and can distort and disorder lives. I do not agree that it does not exist. But I do agree with the author that one of the key ingredients to solving the problem of mental illness is nutritional therapy. Other highly useful tools include BeuroBioFeedback to literally help the brain learn better patterns of neuronal communication through feedback techniques, detoxification to eliminate neurological and physiologoical poisons, dietary strategies to eliminate foods that precipitate aberrant brain function, neutralization for allergies, herbal and acupuncture treatments. And careful, skilled listening, a much undervalued, much underused tool in effectively dealing with mental health issues.

Psychiatric drugs are a shameful sham, in my opinion, purveyed through corruption and propaganda reaching into virtually every medical journal, most clinical studies and the halls of every medical school. The FDA is, in effect, regulated by the regulated industries and you, the consumer/patient/person impacted by their decisions and deceit are at risk. Children, especially, should never, that is never, in my opinion, be exposed to psychiatric medications. We simply do not know enough about their impact on the developing nervous system to say that these dangerous and toxic substances are even remotely close to “safe” for children. There is no excuse for their use which can possibly justify it and other alternatives always, at least in the course of my long experience, exist which are safer and more effective.
And psychoactive medications carry the risk of suicide and homicide with them. Every, that is every, school shooting, and many tragic disasters outside of schools, involves psychoactive drugs either being taken by the shooter/slayer or being withdrawn from by the shooter/slayer. Psycoactive drugs are a danger to society.

Just Say “NO” and find a better option. They are out there. Maybe that’s the real reason we have the internet!

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

The Truth About Mental Illness…

What I’m about to state may seem incredible and unbelievable. The truth is, there is no such thing as MENTAL illness!!! Mental illness is mostly the manifestation of the human mind going awry due to the assault on it by our empty, polluted and highly toxic food! Note, lest I be misquoted, I said ‘mostly’, you see, the other causative factors like stress, are not anywhere near as important as the polluted, toxic and empty food that we ingest.

BEYOND MADNESS?

Introduction: “He is a schizophrenic, she’s bipolar. She’s on Prozac… her child is on Ritalin…, he has ADHD/ADD…” I’m sure that most of you have heard such whisperings…, and these statements are whispered as if a great plague has descended upon people who are schizophrenic or bipolar or ADHD/ADD. People who suffer from these conditions are looked upon as if they’re mentally ill or insane or mad or all three! The question I want to ask and answer tonight, is this:

Is the condition of being schizophrenic or bipolar or ADHD/ADD or depressed psychological or is it physical in nature, and what kind of protocol if any would heal people who suffer from these conditions?

Each of us has innate biochemical factors which influence mental health, immune function, allergic tendencies, and more. Scientists tell us that the number of different genetic combinations possible in a child from the same two parents exceeds forty-two million. Except for identical twins, each human being has unique biochemistry resulting in quite diverse nutritional needs. Shakespeare was correct when he wrote, “One man’s meat is another man’s poison.” For example, some of us are genetically suited for a vegetable-based diet and others are not. Some people can satisfy their nutritional needs by programme A, whilst others for the same condition must be on programme B to overcome genetic aberrations. This is a big key in healing my friends, what will work for one, will not necessarily work for another. Because of genetic differences in the way our bodies process foods, most of us are quite deficient in certain nutrients and overloaded in others. Even with an ideal diet, which is almost impossible these days, most of us have certain nutrients that are at very low levels causing us to require many times the Recommended Daily Allowance to achieve a healthy balance.

As we progress in the new millennium, the medical and scientific communities agree on the tremendous influence of neurotransmitters like Serotonin on behavior disorders like “ADHD” (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder), depression, and “schizophrenia”, bipolar disorder, etc., etc. People can have a predisposition for these problems due to genetically aberrant levels of specific neurotransmitters. Our mental health is hugely dependent upon having the proper amount of these critical brain chemicals. Some psychiatrists express their scorn for nutrient therapies, claiming that they are too puny to have any real clinical potency. They often say, “You really need a drug to get the job done for a serious condition like depression.”

My favorite response begins by asking the question, “Where do our neurotransmitters come from?” The brain is a chemical factory that produces serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and other brain chemicals 24 hours a day. The only raw materials for their syntheses are nutrients, namely, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, etc. If the brain receives improper amounts of these nutrient building blocks, we can expect serious problems with our neurotransmitters.

For example, some depression patients have a genetic pyrrole disorder which render them grossly depleted in vitamin B-6. A pyrrole is a basic chemical structure that is used in the formation of heme, which makes blood red. Pyrroles bind with vitamin B6 and then with zinc, thus depleting these nutrients. These individuals cannot efficiently create serotonin (a neurotransmitter) since B-6 is an important factor in the last step of its synthesis. Do you understand this my friends? If you want to understand the reason for mental illness, you have to understand this, that:

The brain is a chemical factory that produces serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and other brain chemicals 24 hours a day. The only raw materials for their syntheses are nutrients, namely, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, etc. If the brain receives improper amounts of these nutrient building blocks, we can expect serious problems with our neurotransmitters.

Many people who suffer from depression appear to benefit from Prozac (c), Paxil (c), Zoloft (c), or other serotonin-enhancing medications. However, as with all mind-altering drugs, horrendous side effects occur and the true cause of the mental difficulties remains uncorrected. Similar – and more healthful – benefits can be achieved by simply giving these people sufficient amounts of B-6 along with supporting nutrients.

“Most neurotransmitter problems appear to be genetic in nature and involve abnormal absorption, metabolism, or storage of key nutrients. As neuroscience advances, biochemical treatments to correct brain chemistry become better defined. Nutrient therapy can be very potent and does not involve side effects, since no molecules foreign to the body are needed. This therapeutic approach may eventually eliminate the need for most psychiatric medications. The Pfeiffer Treatment Center has amassed a large database of biochemical information from more than 10,000 patients with mental health problems. Examination of this data shows that most of these persons have striking abnormalities in specific nutrients required for neurotransmitter production.” Extracted from: ‘The Critical Role of Nutrients in Severe Mental Symptoms’ by William Walsh, Ph.D. Senior Scientist, Health Research Institute and Pfeiffer Treatment Center, 1804 Centre Point Circle, Suite 102. Naperville, IL 60563

The Pfeiffer Treatment Center, in Naperville, IL. is world famous for it’s outstanding contribution to curing mental illness, my friends, and the message fro that center, as I just read to you is loud and clear, when our brain has the necessary nutrients, mental illness disappears, so, we see that so-called ‘mental’ illness is not mental at all but physical in nature.

Now, what I’m about to expose to you next, is not for the weak of heart, so get ready for some horrible facts.

As ClinicalTrials.gov reveals, in 2005, Massachusetts General Hospital conducted an 8-week trial study that recruited children as young as four years old to be drugged and monitored, including having their blood drawn, to see if their tiny four-year-old bodies would tolerate a powerful psychotropic drug called Seroquel.

The following quote is extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov:

[This is an 8-week open-label study aimed at assessing the effectiveness and tolerability of Quetiapine (c), in the treatment of preschool children aged 4 to 6 years with bipolar and bipolar spectrum disorder. This is an exploratory, pilot study, seeking to determine whether Quetiapine (c) is efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of preschoolers with pediatric bipolar and bipolar spectrum disorder in this age group.

Ages Eligible for Study:4 Years – 6 Years, Genders Eligible for Study: Both

Subject must be able to participate in mandatory blood draws.

Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, United States; Recruiting

Joseph Biederman, MD, Principal Investigator ]

In my view, this exploitation of young children for drug testing amounts to nothing less than crimes against humanity, these people should be tried as international criminals of the worst kind and as demented child abusers. What possible medical justification could these doctors, hospital staff and drug pushers have for prescribing mind-altering drugs to four-year-olds? Even the “disease” being treated here is entirely fictional. So-called “bi-polar disorder” was wholly invented by psychiatrists with strong financial ties to drug companies. The purpose of this disease is not to help children, but to sell drugs to anyone and everyone, including toddlers. I often wonder when the world will wake up and notice that the mass-drugging of our children has gone too way, way too far. Why isn’t the mainstream media giving this front-page coverage? Why aren’t lawmakers demanding an end to the chemical abuse of our children? Why isn’t the FDA halting these trials on toddlers out of plain decency?

You already know the answer: Because they’re all making money from this chemical assault on our children. The doctors, hospitals, drug companies, psychiatrists and mainstream media all profit handsomely from the sales of mind-altering drugs to children. Ethics will never get in the way of old-fashioned greed, even when we’re talking about the health and lives of four-year-olds. Modern psychiatry, with all its false authority, drugging of children and rampant disease mongering, is an affront to all people who believe in honest medical science and basic human decency. Armed with the DSM-IV, on-the-take psychiatrists invent diseases out of thin air (like “bi-polar disorder”), then vote official treatment protocols into the reference books. Yet a recent review of such decision panels reveals that one hundred percent of the psychiatrists and doctors involved in such decisions have financial ties to the drug companies that coincidentally happen to manufacture the recommended drugs.

Now, let me remind you of the facts about so-called ‘mental illness’ as outlined by Natural medicine clinics like the Pfeiffer Treatment Center, in Naperville, IL. Clinics like these with databases exceeding 10,000 clients have irrefutably proven that NATURAL MEDICINE WITH NO SIDE EFFECTS ROUTINELY HEALS MENTAL ILLNESS, HOW COME, THEN, THESE CRIMINAL EXPERIMENTS, SANCTIONED BY GOVERNMENTS AND SO-CALLED MEN OF SCIENCE? This is a life-threatening scandal of such proportion that it deserves a World Court investigation, complete with criminal charges being brought against many of these so-called “doctors.” To characterize this as a crime against humanity is not an exaggeration.

Let’s face it: Modern psychiatry and its incessant disease mongering amounts to quackery at its worst. This group both invents the diseases, then hawks the ‘snake oil’ that “treats” those diseases. Many so-called ‘mental’ diseases can be diagnosed in children on a whim, based on a mere sixty seconds of casual observation combined with the biased opinion of a drug-pushing psychiatrist being bribed by Big Pharma.

This is not medicine, folks. And it’s certainly not science. It’s just plain medical fraud. Yet the whole of conventional medicine goes along with it, pretending that nothing is amiss. Doctors, hospitals, FDA bureaucrats, teachers and even many parents just pretend that all these mysterious brain chemistry diseases have spontaneously appeared in the world over the last ten years, suddenly afflicting tens of millions of children. And thank goodness the drug companies just happened to have invented all these treatment drugs at the exact same moment in history when these psychiatric diseases became so widespread! Imagine the odds…

Where are the skeptics on this issue? Where are the quack busters on the drugging of our children? The silence is deafening. They have nothing to say about the lack of science behind psychiatric disease mongering. They aren’t skeptical at all. Clear thinking, it seems, isn’t allowed when the conclusions might question the institutions of modern medicine. And thus, the skeptics reveal themselves as little more than purveyors of medical dogma; protectors of a drug-the-children medical cult that demands unquestioning obedience to its profit-minded beliefs.

Good science has long since left psychiatry, my friends. And if you want to know the true, horrifying history of the mental health industry, visit the Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights. Prepare to be shocked.

Psychiatry believes there is no child too young to diagnose as having psychiatric disorders. There’s no end to the evil that psychiatry might do in the years ahead. As long as society continues to give psychiatrists carte blanche to invent fictitious diseases, there is no human behavior, emotion or condition that’s safe from being labeled a pathology. So-called “adult ADHD screening tests” label a whopping 80 percent of participants with the disease. Behavioral disorders screenings for children demonstrate similar numbers. And the things that can get you labeled as “diseased” are all too mundane: Feeling overwhelmed, feeling distracted by modern life, handling too many projects at once, being afraid of public speaking, feeling shy in social situations… gee, is there anyone who doesn’t experience these sooner or later?

A couple of decades ago, psychiatry started drugging teens with antidepressant drugs. Then they attacked younger schoolchildren with Ritalin. Now they’re targeting preschoolers, and the trend is clear: Children will soon be “born psychotic” if psychiatry has anything to do with it.

Years ago, the giant soda companies handed out baby bottles emblazoned with the logos of their flagship soft drink products. The idea was to get mothers to feed their infants soda instead of infant formula, thereby altering the taste of the infant for life, creating a lifelong consumer of soft drinks. When we first uncovered this disturbing report, we thought it was perhaps the most evil thing a corporation could do to the health of infants. But now, psychiatry takes the prize. Using four-year-olds as guinea pigs to test psychotropic drugs is more than merely unethical; it’s predatory. It’s Nazi-esque in its use of human beings for medical experiments, and yet it remains strangely acceptable across society. Child Protective Services does nothing. Hospitals gladly run the trials (they get paid, of course). Psychiatrists and doctors happily drug these children, observe them, then draw their blood, all in the name of corporate profits. And thus, they all join the long and sordid history of human medical experimentation that demonstrates ethics, or human lives, or plain decency will never get in the way of the forward march of medicine.

Now, in life we need balance. There are a handful of doctors, not many, but there are a handful of doctors, authors, organizations and celebrities that dare tell the truth on this issue, and they are singled out for incessant ridicule. Take Tom Cruise, for example. Although he speaks the truth about the drugging of children, he is endlessly dragged through the mud of public opinion simply because he expresses authentic passion for ending this chemical child abuse. Cruise should be applauded for his efforts, not ridiculed.

When it comes to mental health, there is one group of people that truly needs to be drugged: Those who run and own the huge multi-trillion dollar pharmaceutical companies and anyone who peddles their filth. Because to encourage and support the mass drugging of toddlers and schoolchildren, is to demonstrate a deep-rooted madness that definitely justifies chemical restraint. To drug toddlers, or to use them for medical experiments, should be rightly regarded as a crime. And there’s no question whatsoever that the children of our nation would be safer, healthier and happier if the practice of modern psychiatry simply disappeared.

Besides, the real cause of depression, mood swings, emotional disorders or other so-called “diseases” mostly comes down to polluted food. Remove the food additives and refined sugars from a child’s diet, and he returns to normal in about two weeks. Feed children healthy oils, live foods, whole grains and super-foods, along with NATURAL MEDICINE and you automatically create energetic, curious, fast-learning children who need no drugs. Give children some sunshine, play time and some time with nature, and you get balanced, healthy children. It’s no secret, it’s just common sense. But psychiatry has no common sense, and no one in the industry dares mention that most so-called mental disorders are really just caused by nutritional imbalances, AS I HAVE SHOWN YOU TONITE BY QUOTING THE EXPERTS, MY FRIENDS. Because to admit to the truth about the mental health of children would be to render their careers irrelevant. And no psychiatrist is going to commit career suicide by admitting that bi-polar disorder was just made up, or that toddlers need good food and natural medicine, not expensive drugs. Just like conventional doctors, psychiatrists have to protect their egos and revenue streams, and that means convincing parents that little Johnny has a brain chemistry imbalance and he’ll have to take psychotropic drugs for life. The parents, as gullible as ever, naively go along with the scam, usually after being frightened into compliance by a psychiatrist who warns them what might happy to little Johnny if they don’t drug him. “He might commit suicide,” they’re sternly warned. Will the scams of modern medicine never cease? Is there no child too young to be targeted for medical experiments? Will the sinister desire for Big Pharma profits ever be balanced against basic human decency? I don’t know… Big money and governments have indeed, gone mad. And psychiatry is standing by, ready to drug everyone, regardless of their age or mental health status.

Holistic Healing South Africa

Quotes of Note: How Big Pharma Puts Vaccine Profits Before Safety

Friday, February 29th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

This interesting piece is a compendium of quotes, with attributions that will make the concerned person’s hair stand on end. mine is.
Share this information widely.
And don’t forget to give generously to the Natural Solutions Foundation so we can keep bringing important and timely information, and taking strong and effective action, to protect your health and health freedom.
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org

Profits before Safety
Quotes

[You can see how child safety doesn’t feature in the medical cartel’s agenda. Years after they find a vaccine is found to be “unsafe” (that’s just more unsafe than usual) in one country, it may eventually get withdrawn in others. Then they just sell it to a third world country, another weapon in their covert ploy to reduce the world’s population. And naive folk think they make vaccines to save children’s lives, and that they really think MMR is safe!]
1. Use up stock even though proven unsafe or use cheaper less safe vaccines
2. Use flawed or fraudulent methods to get vaccines on market
3. Avoid long term safety studies for obvious reasons
3b No government vaccine testing
4. Change the law to limit liability to government not vaccine companies so removing one of the main drivers for safe vaccines
4b Formulate a vaccine damage law (VICP) so it is very difficult to claim & prove vaccine damage against the government
5. Buy up the vaccine experts so you are less likely to lose vaccine damage cases that prove vaccine dangers
6. Keep safety data secret from government regulators
7. Government vaccine regulators & medical doctors “controlled” by vaccine companies
7b. Industry funds vaccine “Nonprofit” Groups
8. Buy up the media so investigative journalism on vaccine safety & dangers is almost non-existent:
9. Disregard for safety can be seen in the selling of withdrawn vaccines to third world, and unethical vaccine experiments
10. Non vaccine examples

“Clear and certain medical knowledge, namely that the BCG-vaccine is not only ineffective but also harmful, was kept quiet for 27 years (in Germany) while the vaccine continued to be used and children were being harmed by it….almost 500 (estimated) cases of vaccine damage per year.”–The Decline of Tuberculosis despite “protective” Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p119/117.

NAAR should know that I was on the WHO immunology panel for 20 years and continually urged discontinuation of thimersol in vaccines. The only ones who listened were the Scandinavian countries (esp. Finland, where I hold an honorary Ph.D.). Those countries banned thimersol in 1992.—–H. Hugh Fudenberg, M.D.

” Goldman also reports that shortly after communicating on authorship issues with health officials associated with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) concerning the shingles data and analysis, he was threatened with legal action if he published the manuscript in the medical literature. He said, “Whenever research data and information concerning potential adverse effects associated with a vaccine used in a human population are suppressed and/or misrepresented by health authorities, not only is this most disturbing, it goes against all accepted scientific norms and dangerously compromises professional ethics.”” ATA REVEALS THREAT OF SHINGLES EPIDEMIC FROM VACCINE USE Health Officials Threaten Legal Action Against Researcher

1. Use up stock even though proven unsafe or use cheaper less safe vaccines:

“DOCTORS have been told to come clean about Infanrix, the safer whooping cough jab available on the NHS – but only if directly challenged about it by parents. The compromise means that parents who ask no questions will have their children injected with the cheaper DTwP jab laced with ethyl mercury – a substance ordered out of US medicine on health grounds.”–Media Feb 2003

“For decades, American pharmaceutical companies have known how to produce the safer DPT vaccine but decided not to bring it to market because it would increase production costs and lower the drug’s 50% or higher profit margins.”–Money Magazine

“Drug companies keep DTP alive because it is less-expensive to make, offers a bigger profit margin and can be easily dumped on developing countries……Because many pediatricians prefer to reduce office visits by giving the combined DTP-HiB shot and because many HMOs use about 50 percent DTPH, as many as 30 percent of American infants still get reactive whole-cell pertussis.”–NVIC http://www.909shot.com/gnssafet.htm

“The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed thousands of British babies to be inoculated with toxic whooping cough vaccines it knew had not passed crucial safety tests.”–Media July 2001

“MERCURY, one of the most dangerous substances known to man, is being used in a series of infant vaccines – in spite of a warning from NHS advisers that its use as a cheap preservative “may be toxic” to babies aged under six months….. “The very low thiomersal concentrations present in the pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic in adults,” the UKMI report says. “But it may be toxic in utero [in the foetus] and during the first six months of life.” It is the first time any UK health official has admitted to the danger posed by mercury in vaccines…..The list includes four out of the seven flu vaccines issued this year by the government, a pneumonia vaccine and four of the 11 child vaccines. The main source is the triple DTwP jab, for whole-cell diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. “–Media Jan 2003

“They say there is growing concern that a mercury compound in the three-in-one DTP vaccine may cause autism and brain damage. The vaccine, which protects against diphtheria, tetanus and pertusis or whooping cough, is given to infants of eight weeks and older. However, the Department of Health has said there is no cause for concern and that the vaccine is safe for children….”–Media Jan 2003

“Michigan had made too much DPT in its Lansing laboratory and wanted to sell it to other states. That required FDA testing and approval, as with any other manufacturer. However, the FDA denied approval and returned the vaccine, saying It was 300 percent too potent. State health officials disagreed and decided to test the vaccine on children in Ingham County (Lansing). Despite more adverse reactions than usual, health officials released 400,000 doses of the DPT vaccine for use throughout the state a month later.”—Fresno Bee DPT report 1984

“They began using MMR in April 1989 and by July doctors were already warning of side-effects, but the government didn’t take any notice because it was not convenient for them. They kept using it for another 3 years, securing the profits for the manufacturers”.—Shunsuke Fuji

“Congress requires records to be kept of the lot numbers of vaccines for which unusually large number of “adverse events” (side effects) are reported. But the information is then simply ignored. The “hot lots,” as they are called, are not destroyed, but continue to be injected into infants and children. (no use throwing out expensive vaccines–dollars are worth more than lives, just as in the U.K.) “—Dr Rimland

“SENIOR government advisers said as early as 1989 that vaccines could provide a route by which BSE could be transferred to human beings.”–Media report

“Up to 300 cases relate to this brand of vaccine – Pluserix – which was banned by the Department of Health in 1992 after being linked with meningitis. This was two years after an identical vaccine was banned in Canada.”–Media

“THE Department of Health has told doctors they must use stocks of a mercury-based vaccine for infants even though it is being phased out for safety reasons.”–Media Aug 2001

“According to one memo, SV40 was found in three of 15 lots of the oral vaccine seven months after the federal directive was issued in March 1961. Lederle released the contaminated vaccine to the public anyway, the memo shows. The documents also suggest that the company failed to test the monkey- kidney seed strains used to make the bulk polio vaccine for contamination, despite a written warning from Dr. Albert Sabin, who developed the oral vaccine.”–Media

“In 1990, scientists from the Queen’s Medical Centre Nottingham found some children developed a form of meningitis after receiving it. But despite this the Government went on using it for more than two years. The Canadian Government, also using the vaccine, immediately switched to a safer version. It was not until September 1992 that the UK Department of Health issued pharmacists with emergency supplies of a safer brand with instructions to withdraw existing batches.”–Sunday Express

“The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed thousands of British babies to be inoculated (late 60’s-early 70’s) with toxic whooping cough vaccines it knew had not passed crucial safety tests.”–Media July 2001

2. Use flawed or fraudulent methods to get vaccines on market:

“The Prevnar pre-licensure clinical trials, which Wyeth Lederle paid Kaiser Permanente to conduct, compared two experimental vaccines against each other. To compound this basic methodological flaw, Kaiser and Wyeth Lederle, allowed most of the children in the trial to be given the more reactive DPT vaccine rather than use the safer, less reactive DTaP vaccine. This placed the children in that five-year experiment in greater danger and allowed the drug company to write off the seizures that occurred as being caused by DPT and not Prevnar, when in fact, they didn’t know. Even so, the groups of children who got Prevnar suffered more seizures, higher fevers, more irritability and other reactions than did the children who got the other experimental vaccine. It was a no-brainer as far as I was concerned: Kaiser and Wyeth Lederle had proved nothing about Prevnar vaccine safety.”–Barbara Loe Fisher

“The evaluation of safety and efficacy and federal approval of Prevnar is laden with ethical questions. Many of the doctors directly involved in the testing and approval process appear to have significant conflicts of interest. The efficacy of the vaccine is questionable and safety testing has been terribly inadequate. There are no long-term studies (i.e. more than 5 years) of the chronic, debilitating and life threatening diseases that this vaccine may cause. The fact that the vaccine is bio-engineered by combining various types and portions of bacteria should require it to undergo considerable scrutiny. Assuming the vaccine has any efficacy at all, the need for universal vaccination needs to be reexamined in light of the small number of children who might be at risk from serious complications from pneumococcal disease. “—Michael Horwin, MA

3. Avoid long term safety studies for obvious reasons:

JABS has not been able to find any properly conducted trials where the safety of the vaccines has been monitored for more than a few weeks. JABS has not been able to find any studies of the long-term consequences of the use of the MMR vaccines
Why Does The MMR Vaccine Need To Be Suspended? http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/jabs/mmrsuspend.html

“The anthrax vaccine was approved without every doing a controlled clinical study. There is no long term safety data on the anthrax vaccine. The government admitted this in congressional hearings. It is a distortion of the truth to say there is substantial safety data.”–Bart Classen

“Longest safety trial of of the triple vaccine (MMR, all live attenuated viruses) was three weeks.”–Dr Fudenburg MD

“I have minutes from a CDC Study Group Meeting on the Hepatitis B vaccine held in March, 1997. The minutes of the meeting show that it would take at least a 60 day study to show the onset of MS. Clinical studies done by the two manufacturers were four and five days in length, respectively. It should be noted that the afternoon session of this meeting was chaired by Dr. Robert Sharrar of Merck.”–Betty D. Fluck

3b No government vaccine testing:

“FDA virologist Peter Reeve…….. acknowledged that the FDA suspended its own independent tests of vaccine purity 15 years ago, leaving it entirely up to the manufacturers to ensure the vaccine is contaminant free.”–‘The Virus and the Vaccine’: Atlantic Monthly http://www.whale.to/vaccines/sv409.html

“In addition, the U.S. Office of Technology, one of the few semi-reliable agencies of the U.S. government, says there is no current system utilized by the CDC to determine if the vaccines do work or how dangerous they really are.”–Dr Douglass M.D.

4. Change the law so liability is limited to government not vaccine companies which removes one of the main drivers for safe vaccines:

“Vaccine manufacturers and others are sheltered from product liability lawsuits by a special 1986 act of Congress. (See the US Code 42 USC 300aa for details.) This act set up a fund to compensate those who can prove serious injury from vaccines.”–Roger Schlafly

“But instead of selling the safer Japanese (DPT) vaccine, Warchafsky says, U.S. manufacturers asked Congress to limit their liability for adverse reactions to any vaccine mandated by the government, hinting they might stop producing children’s vaccines without it. ” —-Congressional Quarterly Researcher

4b Formulate a vaccine damage law (VICP) so it is very difficult to claim & prove vaccine damage against the government

Vaccine law quotes

5. Buy up the vaccine experts so you are less likely to lose vaccine damage cases that prove vaccine dangers:

“And then the industry started buying up the experts,” he contends, citing the example of James Cherry, a widely recognized pertussis expert who has served on both the ACIP and the AAP’s vaccine advisory committee.”—-Congressional Quarterly Researcher

CASE No. 82-1232, Cossette Krause, vs F.K. Abbousy, MD et al (State of Ohio), transcipt of videotape deposition of Dr Edward Mortimer September 6, 1984.. On page 11 reads the following:

“Several years ago, because of the increasing amount of litigations over DTP, members of the so-called Red Book Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics agreed in a sense that we would sort of divide up the cases to try to help the manufacturers in these lawsuits, and therefore I and a number of my colleagues agreed to serve as expert witnesses.”

6. Keep safety data secret from government regulators:

“FDA virologist Peter Reeve…….. acknowledged that the FDA suspended its own independent tests of vaccine purity 15 years ago, leaving it entirely up to the manufacturers to ensure the vaccine is contaminant free.”–‘The Virus and the Vaccine’: Atlantic Monthly http://www.whale.to/vaccines/sv409.html

“Since the 1920s, virtually all continuing medical and public health education is funded by pharmaceutical companies. In fact, today, the FDA can’t even tell health scientists the truth about vaccine contaminants and their likely effects. The agency is bound and gagged by proprietary laws and non-disclosure agreements forced upon them by the pharmaceutical industry. Let us not forget that the pharmaceutical industry, as a special interest group, is the number one contributor to politicians on Capital Hill.”–Leonard Horowitz

“Since vaccine development information is considered proprietary (protected by nondisclosure policies) government officials and researchers must shield potential safety issues from public scrutiny. This censorship is rationalized by the all too persuasive argument that vaccines cannot be criticized lest the public become non-compliant in taking them. Finally, this silence is buttressed by the small number of people capable of critically evaluating vaccine manufacturing and safety testing procedures. In essence, health care professionals and the general public know little about the possible dangers of live viral vaccines.”–Dr Martin

7. Government vaccine regulators & medical doctors “controlled” by vaccine companies

Vaccine Conflict of Interest Quotes

7b. Industry funds vaccine “Nonprofit” Groups quotes

8. Buy up the media so investigative journalism on vaccine safety & dangers is almost non-existent:

quotes Rare instances: Fresno Bee report Money Magazine William Carlsen

9. Disregard for safety can be seen in the selling of withdrawn vaccines to third world, and unethical vaccine experiments

“Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is every parents’ worst nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente of Southern California and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) jointly conducted a measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made “high titre” Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor, primarily black and Latino, inner city children in Los Angeles. Highly recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), the high-potency experimental vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It was discontinued in these countries when it was discovered that the children were dying in large numbers.”–Dr Alan Cantwell MD

“To determine the effect of different amounts of the vaccines, researchers at the hospital inoculated newborns from mostly lower-income black families with doses ranging up to more than 100 times the dose recommended for adults.”–Media

On september 14, 1992 two measles vaccines (Pluserix & Immravax) were banned in the UK after it was revealed that children had developed meningitis. On Sept 16, 1992 the New Zealand government withdrew Pluserix

1997 Brazil:
OUTBREAK OF ASEPTIC MENINGITIS ASSOCIATED WITH MASS VACCINATION WITH A URABE CONTAINING MMR VACCINE

2002:
“Officers are also investigating how a consignment of potentially dangerous mumps vaccine was sent to one of Direct Health 2000’s suppliers. The vaccine sent by a German distributor turned out to be of the Urabe strain, banned in Britain since 1992 as it can cause viral meningitis in babies. “–Media 2002

10 .Non vaccine examples

“The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency found from information that had been in its possession for more than a decade that high doses of the anti-depressant can lead to aggression and thoughts of suicide. But instead of revealing the truth to the 17,000 people taking high doses and the other half-million Britons on a safer dose, the MHRA sat on its findings. Astonishingly, I was actually threatened with legal action by Professor Kent Woods, chief executive of the MHRA, if I revealed this.”—RICHARD BROOK

In the same year, the Washington Post (3) published the fact that Ritalin which is prescribed to very young children had never been tested on that age group (under 6’s) and yet, between 150,000 – 200,000 children between the ages of 2 and 4 were prescribed Ritalin. Hilary Butler letter to BMJ 2004

Nov 15, 2004 Pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co Inc. had evidence by 2000 that its painkiller Vioxx, which was pulled off the market on Sept. 30, was not safe [Media Nov 2004] Merck Knew Vioxx Was Unsafe by 2000

[Media aug 2001] Drug scientists ‘put profits before lives’
CJD warnings ignored
[Media March 2004 Seroxat] Why I resigned over this disgraceful “happy pill” cover-up

[Home]

Another Must Read Article on Vaccination at Gun Point

Friday, February 29th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Smallpox vaccine at Gunpoint?
By Barbara Flynn
Reprinted from The Idaho Observer , April 15, 2002:

On February 27, 2002, the Wisconsin Legislature passed a Mandated Vaccination/ Emergency Health Powers Act which calls for a $10,000 fine and /or nine months in prison for those who refuse vaccinations. The former Governor of Wisconsin, U.S. Health Secretary Tommy Thompson is now calling for Model Emergency Health Powers Acts (MEHPA) in all states.

In an article in New Jersey’s Daily Record on January 20, 2002, District 21 Assemblyman Dr. Eric Munoz promised to spearhead a Rapid Mass Smallpox Immunization Plan for New Jersey. And in the February 1, 2002 edition of the Star-Ledger we find that the CDC has offered New Jersey $26.8 million to “come up with a plan” by April 15, 2002.

In 1902, Cambridge Massachusetts Board of Health passed an ordinance that required everyone to get smallpox vaccinations every 5 years or pay a $5 fine. Henning Jacobsen and his son who had both suffered severe and prolonged reactions to the vaccine refused both the vaccine and the fine. Both were found guilty by the Massachusetts Supreme Court and Jacobsen vs. Massachusetts became the first and only vaccination case to reach the highest court. The Supreme Court ignored compelling evidence that the vaccines did not work and were dangerous. “While we do not decide and cannot decide that vaccination is a preventative of smallpox, we take judicial notice of the fact that this is the COMMON BELIEF of the people of the State, and with this fact as a foundation we hold that the statute in question is a health law, enacted as a reasonable and proper exercise of POLICE POWER.” [What Every Parent Should Know About Childhood Immunizations, Jamie Murphy, 1990, p.124] In other words, an opinion poll was preferable to hard epidemiological and scientific data regarding vaccination.

What data might Jacobsen hypothetically have presented? Dr. Charles Creighton, professor of Microscopic Anatomy at Cambridge and author of Epidemics of Great Britain said, “The real affinity of cowpox is not to smallpox, but to the great pox (syphilis). The vaccinal ulcer of everyday practice is to all intents and purposes, a chancre (syphilitic ulcer).” Commissioned by Encyclopedia Britannica to assemble information on syphilis (9th Edition, Vol. 24, p23) he reported that “in the first year of compulsory vaccination (1854), deaths from syphilis among infants under one year of age suddenly increased by one-half and the increase has gone on steadily since.”

Edward Jenner who is credited with perpetrating smallpox vaccine on the public in 1796 believed that the syphilitic scar was an indication that the vaccine took or would provide immunity for life. According Dr. Hadwens editorial in “Truth” (1/10/23)

Edward Jenner was a country apothecary who purchased his Medical Degree from St. Andrew s College for the modest sum of £15 ($75). Based on a single experiment with eight-year-old, James Phipps with no clinical trials or follow-up studies, Jenner received £30,000 ($150,000) from the British Government for his great discovery.

The superstitious belief in “scar” production had tragic consequences for Marcella Gruelle, 13, daughter of “Raggedy Ann” book and doll creator, Johnny Gruelle. In 1915, she lost her life at the hands of the New York Public School System because she could not produce the scar. Her parents reluctantly gave permission for one school administrated smallpox shot. A few weeks later, without parental permission, she was inoculated again as it was deemed that the prior did not “take.” Paralysis and death followed quickly. [Johnny Gruelle, Creator of Raggedy Ann and Andy, Patricia Hall, 1993, p. 87-92] Raggedy Ann, as American as apple pie, is really a pervasive symbol of smallpox vaccine injury and death.

If cowpox (vaccinia) more closely resembles syphilis than it does smallpox (variola), how did the vaccination wipe out smallpox? Apparently, it didn’t. On June 5, 1937, Dr. William Howard Hay testified before Congress about the effectiveness of the smallpox vaccine in the Philippines. Dr. Hay describes a vaccination program spanning a six-year period in which 10,000,000 people (95% of the population) were repeatedly vaccinated. In spite of vaccinations a terrible smallpox epidemic ensued. It was four times as fatal as any that had occurred before vaccinationa death rate of 60% as opposed to the usual 10% to 15%. Additionally, Anne Riley Hales 1935 book, The Medical Voodoo recounts the history of Englands smallpox vaccination and resulting epidemics.

Lastly, in 1900, Dr. Charles Campbell of Texas published findings that smallpox was a filth disease, carried by a blood sucking insect, Cimex lectularius (bedbug), that it was neither infectious nor contagious, and that vaccinations do not prevent it. So convinced was he of this that he would move in with and sleep in the same bedroom with those who had contracted smallpox once their homes were fumigated and bedbug free. His reports were ignored. [Bacteria Inc. Cash Asher, 1948,p. 36-37]

The Nuremberg Code (Doctors Trial, 1947) which specified that human beings could not be used as medical experiments without their consent, supercedes Jacobsen vs. Massachusetts (1905). However, Lawrence O. Gostin, the Georgetown University Law Professor who wrote the original 40 page MEHPA invoked the outdated Jacobsen vs. Massachusetts on the second page of his document to justify forcing untested vaccinations on the public at gun point. According to CNSNews.com Editorial Assistant Michael L. Betsch (12/16/01) Professor Gostin was awarded $300,000 per year for a period of up to three years by the CDC to develop his model legislation, among other projects. He also states that the Illinois Legislature has already rejected a proposed MEHPA Bill. On March 6, 2002 the Wyoming House Minerals Committee voted 8-1 to “kill” their MEHPA bill. [Sierra Times.com]

Historically, vaccination policy has been a conflict between the “thought police” who profit financially from this medical fraud and humanitarians who subscribe to the precautionary principle: “First do no harm.”

In the wake of September 11, tyrannous violations of human rights may be expected, but are they really in the interests of the public they are supposed to protect? “I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society. When machines and computers are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism and militarism are incapable of being conquered.”[Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: 1967 Riverside Church Sermon] To Dr. King’s “triplet” we can add the surrender of bodily integrity to the government. Our challenge is to advance the revolution of values that Dr. King advocated, not to reverse it.

Barbara Flynn, MBA, of Summit, NJ, is the founder of CHERUBS (Children Having Everybody Really Upset Bout Shots) A Vaccination Alternatives Network. CHERUBS provides upport for those wishing vaccination exemptions. Barbara Flynn can be contacted by email at: be.cherubs@verizon.net.