Archive for the ‘The Law & CODEX’ Category

Day 28: July 9, 2006

Thursday, July 13th, 2006

July 9, 2006 Off to the airport, on to Mangalore in South India where we were met by Joe, our driver. “Who needs a driver?” we thought. “We’ve driven in Rome, Paris, London…. What’s the bid deal?” WRONG!!!! It’s a very, very big deal, especially in monsoon season. Monsoon is sort of an intermittent, on and off again sort of vertical tsunami. Sometimes it stops and sometimes it simply does not stop but when it rains, there is no moderation in the weather. None. And if it stops, and the semi paved roads are not roiling in red mud and water, the temperature immediately goes up to about a zillion steamy degrees. Come to think of it, before it stops it is pretty much the same, too. Like living inside a super-heated plastic bag with running water. I had never, ever experienced anything like that before. Bert had and he tolerates heat better than I do, anyway. But, I am convinced, the reason that I have survived so far is that our room here at the Mangalore Club, founded by the British in 1876) has air conditioning that works. It is a gracious, historic and well known club and we can see both the British and the Indian print of time and tradition here.

At lunch time, Dr. B. M. Hegde joined us. Exuding light and laughter, intensity and wisdom, Dr. Hegde, a Harvard trained cardiologist (who worked with Nobel Laureate there, is as passionate and knowledgeable an ally as you could wish. Having just written (his latest) book called
What Doctors Don’t Get to Study in Medical School, Dr. Hegde understands the dangers of conventional Western medicine better than most (because he understands conventional Western medicine better than most) and is a fearless, tireless and, here in India, treasured iconoclast and speaker of truth both to power and to the powerless. Bonding does not even begin to describe the phenomenon: there was not enough time to explore all the ways in which we share a world view.

Dinner at the Mangalore Club and then several days of email in their un-air conditioned, mosquito rich office. But I must tell you that the staff at this historic Club is welcoming, interested in our work, helpful and delightful in their warmth and enthusiasm!

Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Labow, MD
Medical Director

Day 25: July 6

Thursday, July 6th, 2006

Day 25: July 6, 2006

Today was another special day for the Natural Solutions Foundation. Dr. Mosha, the Chair of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, apparently violated CAC procedure to go back and revisit a section of the report of the most recent Codex Alimentarius Executive Committee which took place just before the current CAC meeting. Now, ordinarily, procedural rules are absolutely sacrosanct. They are observed scrupulously (unless of course they are inconvenient, as for example, when the Chair of a Committee or the CAC itself tells a member nation which has called for a vote “Codex does not vote anymore” although the procedural manual says “…each member of the Commission shall have one vote.” (CAC Procedural Manual, Rules of procedure, Rule VII, 1., page 12) and “…any Member of the Commission may request a roll-call vote, in which case the vote of each Member shall be recorded” (CAC Procedural Manual, Rules of procedure, Rule VII, 4., page 12).

In Codex, when an agenda item is complete, it is completed. So it was a huge surprise and, in its way, a rather significant honor or sorts when, have finished the entire work of the CAC meeting today, Dr. Claude Mosha, the CAC Chair, made an exception for us, the Natural Solutions Foundation.

Although the adoption of the report of the Codex Executive Committee (June 28-July 1, 2006) had taken place on the very first day of the CAC meeting, Dr. Mosha though that the status of the Natural Solutions Foundation was so important that he asked the CAC Members, as the last item of business, just before the close of this year’s CAC, to turn back to the report of the Executive Committee, Alinorm 06/29/3A, to regard together Item 109. It reads, in full,

109. The Executive Committee recommended to the Directors-General of FAO and WHO to reject the application for observer status from the Natural Solutions Foundation on the ground that the applicant did not meet the requirement of section 3 (e) of the Principles. Moreover one Member pointed out that the organization did not fulfill other criteria set out in section 3 of the Principles, especially with regard to the confidentiality of members.”

How nice of him! Yes, Section 3 (e) says that an organization has to have been functioning internationally for at least 3 years and we have not and yes, we refused to reveal the names of our “members” because we are not a membership organization and the identities of our donors are confidential. But the Procedural Manual also says, “The Directors-General of FAO and WHO may, upon the advice of the Executive Committee, grant observer status to Organizations not meeting this requirement if it is clear from their application that they would make a significant contribution to advancing the purposes of the Codex Alimentarius Commission.” (CAC Procedural Manual, Guidelines of IGO Cooperation, 3., page 36).

We are flattered that Dr. Moshe took such pains to mention us and look forward to developments under his second term of CAC Chairmanship (to which he was elected without opposition yesterday.) I wonder if his special mention of the Natural Solutions Foundation had anything at all to do with the press release we put out yesterday mentioning another special event which he orchestrated by stopping one of our sponsored Delegates from attending the CAC: Codex Chairman Seeks to Thwart Natural Solutions Foundation Pro-Health Codex Initiative (http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/7/prweb406560.htm) .

Perhaps, or perhaps not. We will probably never know.

Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD

Day 20-21: July 1 and 2, 2006

Sunday, July 2nd, 2006

Day 20 and 21: July 1 and 2, 2006

I have combined both days because they are pretty much the same: inside the hotel room on the internet planning our strategy for the upcoming meetings. We have produced a Codex White Paper which we will be making available after the Codex meeting concludes next week because it is a supporting strategic document for our work here during the meeting and it would be premature to release it now. One of our lawyers was willing to take the time to write a mini-brief on international requirements for national choice in electing to adopt modified Guidelines which are different from Codex’s Guidelines by a country which does not wish to see the health and nutritional security of its people degraded for someone else’s benefit.

You can see how this process works when applied to the restrictive and destructive Codex Vitamin and Mineral Guideline by downloading the highly informative Codex eBook which not only contains a pro health Revised Vitamin and Mineral Guideline side by side with the Codex one (pro health on the left hand side, pro death on the right hand side) but a legal summary of the reasons that our “Codex two step” as I call it, is protective against WTO sanctions and a model legislation which is based on the US law that treats nutrients as foods which do not require upper limits, the 1994 Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act, better known as DSHEA.

DSHEA is a unique piece of legislation since it makes the US the only country in the world which allows consumers — you and me — to access nutrients exactly as we want to and as the market allows. We can take as much of whatever nutrient or herb we want as long as we can find it.

What this grand experiment of billions and billions of doses of all kinds of nutrients and herbs means is that we now have documentation of the absence of nutrient dangers. America looses 1,500 or more people EVERY YEAR to aspirin, a supposedly “safe” over the counter (OTC) drug. We loose more than 100,000 people EVERY YEAR to properly prescribed drugs used under doctor’s supervision in hospitals (according to the Journal of the American Medical Association) and who-knows-how-many hundreds of thousands more on an outpatient basis. The estimates range up to 400,000+ or more — and those are the estimates by mainstream doctors, not people like me who do not use drugs in practice because of their dangers and the fact that there are better ways for treating just about anything that is not acute and immediately life-threatening than with drugs.

But the numbers of deaths from these multibillion doses of nutrients? Find me 100 over the past decade. Find me 10. Find me 1. In fact, even the much vaunted “ephedra deaths”, when examined by the United Stated General Accounting Office (GAO) in a 2 volume document looking at more than 160 deaths supposedly caused by that substance found that not one death could be conclusively linked to the maligned herb. Not one.

And if you want to talk about the 8 supposed kava kava liver failure deaths, I believe firmly that you will find the same pattern: any time, ANY TIME, there is a death which could be linked to a nutrient or an herb, despite the fact that other much more deadly factors are involved (like dangerous legal and illegal drugs, extreme illness, dehydration and extreme activity, etc.) the death is linked not to the reasonable risk factors but to the unreasonable one: the nutrient or herb. And the press, of course, has a field day. The same field day they routinely take whenever anyone suggests that there are dangers in nutrients and herbs. The dangers, are, of course, ill considered and unscientific, but that’s not what you hear from the pharma-fed press, of course.

In the Codex eBook you will also find a detailed and highly referenced essay on the safety and importance of nutrients in public policy and health as well as specific well-researched sections showing the excellent scientific basis of nutrition for treating (not just preventing) 3 of the major public health problems of both the developed and the developing world:
1. Wound healing and trauma (including surgical wounds)
2. Cardiovascular disease and lipid control
3. Diabetes and glucose control.

If you are looking for health information for yourself or others, or perhaps looking for scientific documentation with which to educate your allopathic doctor, this essay is a great science-based resource.

It will also give you a look at what the US will loose if the attack on DSHEA is successful and we “HARMonzie” with the disastrous Codex Vitamin and Mineral Guideline.

The Codex eBook is a template for how any Codex Guideline can be changed. The White Paper (soon to be exclusively available on the Natural Solutions Foundation website, www.HealthFreedomUSA.org) lays these principles out in detail and I know that many of you will want to read it for yourselves. Once the Codex Alimentarius Commission meeting has concluded we will mount it and let you know how to access it.

But wait: there’s more! You probably remember that the Chairman of the Codex Commission has directly attacked a part of our Codex strategy of bringing an articulate and experienced Codex Delegate to the CAC meeting under our sponsorship. Well, we got word today that another country we visited and worked with has intensively decided at their Codex Committee meeting (after we left) that they WILL support us and our strategy in the meeting.

It’s sort of like a fencing match: thrust, parry, counterthrust, parry and thrust again. The fencing ground is the planet’s food supply and nutritional security.

For those of you who have responded to our requests for financial support, thank you. For those of you who are thinking about it, right now is a great time to click and give. All support is now tax deductible so you can do well by doing good, as they say!

To those of you who enjoyed our description of our activities here in Geneva (including the menus), glad you liked hearing a bit of the human side of the battle. For those of you who did not want to hear about it, sorry about that. We try to include a bit of everything along with the war reports.

Yours in health and freedom,

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation

Africa Journal, Days 2 and 3

Wednesday, June 14th, 2006

Day 2
June 13, 2006

In this hot, dusty Africa country, the seat of government is not the same city as the seat of commerce. One lands at the city where business is conducted for the whole region. But Parliament meets in the other city. And they are 500 km (415 miles) apart.
That’s 415 miles on an unfinished road, by the way, with unpaved detours, no roadside amenities or service stations during most of the run and huge oil and cargo lorries barreling down upon you in the other of the two lanes (which you are in to pass the barely moving car in front of you).

So there is a good deal of adrenal workout on an ordinary drive.
ital just before that time and walked into a dark, empty set of corridors with heavy padlocks on white painted wrought iron gates over every office door and one open door: the Minister’s.

I won’t tell you about the unbelievable conditions we passed, nor the fact that when we ran out of gas along the way and pulled into a dilapidated and disserted gas station (whose two goats were the only living creatures we could find), nor about stopping by the desolate side of the road and having 4 or 5 men magically appear with a large jerry can and hose and begin to fill up the tank with illegal gas using an illegal and dangerous method: pouring leaking gas into the gas tank while all of them smoked and the engine was running. I won’t tell you how they gathered around us in a frightening demand for money (and more) when suddenly they recognized the NGO Facilitator as the National Beauty Queen and simple smiled to be seen with her. We got back in the car and whizzed off toward the Capital. I also won’t even begin to tell you about the toilets. You really, really do not want to know.

But when we got to the Minister’s office we found a direct, sincere, humble and decent human being, an American trained Gastroenterologist, who had never heard of Codex but listened with deep attention and growing distress as we explained both the past and present, and then added the future of Codex to the discussion. He took our materials (Nutricide, the DVD, which you can have, too, by going to (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/aboutcodex/dvd.shtml) and the hard copy version of the Codex eBook, available at http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/aboutcodex/dvd.shtml). We explained that the eBook demonstrated the application of our International Strategy for correcting every problem raised by Codex and for protecting the health of his people. We explained, too, that we are facing a great opportunity: South Africa’s “Ottawa Beachhead” in which the 11 point guidelines for the implementation of the pro-health “Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health” gave Codex for the first time a potential focus on Optimal Health needs to be supported and adopted at the upcoming Codex Alimentarius Commission meeting, July 3-7, 2006 (Geneva). We asked the Minister of Health to help make sure that his country’s voice was raised loud, clear and firmly in favor of these principles at this meeting.

His answer? “You have caught my attention. I will certainly read your materials but you understand that I am not able to make policy on my own. I will consult with the appropriate people and contact you!” It was a highly successful and positive meeting with a thoughtful and careful policy maker who did not brush us off and took us very seriously. Tomorrow we meet with the Codex Committee of the country to further this effort here.

But wait! There’s more to this adventure! By now it was late and there was no way that it was safe to drive the road back to the commercial center both because of the brigands we did not meet, but were much more likely to meet after dark and because of the sheer physical danger of the road at night. (Shoulders? Don’t be absurd! Road accidents, by the way, are a hugely significant cause of death here.)

But when we started out we were told that there was a very important ceremony in the Political Capital that day and that the one decent hotel in town would be filled with both the Members of Parliament and with the dignitaries gathered for the ceremony. We had clearly seen on the way to the Capital that there was nothing even vaguely resembling a hotel, let alone one that we would consider staying in.

So we left the Minister’s office very pleased for the intermediate term but very concerned for the immediate one. Nonetheless, we drove to the hotel and made inquiries. Yes, there was a double room for the General and the Doctor. Yes, there was a double room for the lovely young lady and yes, the driver and our contact could share a single bed in the last room. “NO!” was the reply from our contact so, magically, although it was unavailable just moments before, the 4th room materialized and we checked in.

During and after dinner, our lovely, capable and well-known NGO facilitator greeted Member of Parliament after Member of Parliament. She introduced us to them and we told them about the reason for our visit. In an hour or so we met a dozen Members of the Parliament of this dynamic nation and introduced them to the Codex issue. Several of them wanted to talk about it more deeply and so we did, leaving our materials with them as well. We lobbied the MP’s to think about Codex and how they could protect their people while preventing trade sanctions from the World Trade Organization while doing so. To say that they were interested is a woeful understatement.

Then, on to our room where we found a triangular frame hanging from the ceiling over the bed with a circle of steel suspended over the bed from which hung a very large mosquito netting which was wound up into a series of knots hanging over the center of the bed and a large table fan attached to the ceiling. Spread the netting out (which did not have fist size holes in it like the netting we encountered in Adama, Ethiopia earlier this year which we stuffed with underwear), turn on the fan because the netting blocks all movement of air which is not very forceful (making sleeping unbearable if the air does not move inside the net) and dropped off to sleep.

And then the phone (which does not work in this country) rang at 4 AM local time. It was a US product manufacturer who wanted me to be a spokesperson for his products. They are not organic. I declined and asked him not to call at 4AM again. After I hung up I realized that he must have been pretty puzzled since where he was calling from (the East Coast), it was 2 in the afternoon!)

Day 3
June 14, 2006

Good news! The Minister of Energy and Mining wants to meet with us about Codex! Be ready at 8 AM because he has a meeting just after that and he can give us only 5 minutes. Right! Ready! Prepared! And frustrated: No car, no driver, nobody but the NGO facilitator and us. About 45 minutes later, a government truck drives up and we are told to get in at once! Off we go to the Minister’s office for a quick cup of coffee and a very quick discussion. Again, the kind and straightforward Minister told us that he had never heard of Codex and it was clearly not his responsibility but he would read our material carefully because when it came to a Cabinet discussion he wanted to be informed to help guide his country to health.

And then back to the hotel, gather our bags up and prepare for the drive back to the seat of commerce for a crucial meeting with the Codex Committee of this country. YES!

No! You have forgotten about the car and the driver, haven’t you? Well, we certainly did. Where were they? Who knows? Certainly not in front of the hotel waiting to drive we back to the commercial city at a reasonable pace (or at any pace, for that matter). MIA: Missing in Action.

So we waited, watching the precious minutes tick away while our crucial meeting began to evaporate. And that is exactly what happened. The bad news is that they could no longer wait for us because we started off so late that no amount of insane speed could make up for the delay (whose cause is still not known to me).

Oh, did I mention that we had air conditioning for about 12 minutes on the trip and then a ball bearing in the air conditioning unit (?) went out on us (don’t you just hate it when good bearings go bad?) and we were back to open windows with no possibility of breathing because of the dust or no possibility of surviving with the windows closed because of the heat. We vacillated back and forth between the two options for that whole long, terrifying drive. Neither option was satisfactory.

So we missed the appointment. Not to worry, though, we will meet with them tomorrow, we are told. We have asked to leave at 9:30 SHARP, SHARP, SHARP. But this is Africa. We will see what time is like tomorrow.

At any rate, we had time (AAAARRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHH!) because of the missed appointment so we went into the only store here that is believed to sell organic food. The company is South African so a good deal is imported from there. But the produce is primarily gown in this country. It is not labeled as either organic or not and when we asked the manager, she told us that pesticide and other chemicals are virtually unknown in this country. Farmers use traditional means of growing their crops and, in the main, cannot afford the chemicals. This is a country, after all, where less than 10% of the population has access to electricity, let alone spare cash to buy chemicals.

I also took a look around beyond the produce area. The meat counter had locally gown and produced meats in the same kind of packaging we are used to. It also had meat for which a premium was charged: South African meat. It was grey. It had been irradiated. The local meat was, of course, satisfyingly red.

When I explained to our companions the fact that irradiation of food creates huge free radical concentrations which are, in the absence of sufficient anti oxidants, significantly toxic to human beings and the animals which are also fed these toxic meats. Without adequate anti-oxidants (made inaccessible by the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline and the extention of it by World Health Organization to all nutrients) there is no way to neutralize these dangerous metabolic fires which will damages pancreases, brains, eyes, lungs and the immune system. I also found myself explaining that the fats in meats can be transformed by the irradiation process itself into cancer-causing compounds like benzene.

Together we asked ourselves how many “excess cancer deaths” do we need to calculate before we look at the biochemical information on the dangers of free radical excess whether or not Codex wants it?

Then back to the hotel for an outstanding, and inexpensive, seafood buffet dinner.

Tomorrow, the missed appointments! I hope!

In the meantime, the General is already asleep and I will finish my report to you and join him.

Yours in health and freedom,

Dr. Laibow
Medical Director

Rolf Grossklaus, the Dr. Strangelove of Nutrition

Monday, November 21st, 2005

The weather here in Bonn, Germany has been cold, wet and damp. But the weather inside the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) turned icy on a couple of fascinating occasions and was so windy on a couple of others that it is hard to understand why the papers did not blow off our desks.

Dr. Grossklaus took his seat rather grandly and presided quietly while the official meet-ers and greet-ers welcomed us to opening session of the 27th session of the CCNFSDU on behalf of this and that group.

The first greeter, from the German government, pointed us toward several interesting items which did not seem to fit completely with the way Dr. Grossklaus saw things. After noting that the next CCNFSDU meeting (2006) next year would be in Thailand, he predicted that, because of our work, Codex will become even more important in the future. Then he said, “As you know, the revision of the standards of the mandates and terms of reference was high on the committee agenda in July.” That refers to the demand by the World Health Organization (WHO) representative on Thursday, July7, 2005 that Codex either redefine the terms of reference (e.g., mandate) of the CCNFSDU and Codex Committee on Food Labeling (CCFL) to include nutrition for health or find another committee, task force or group to do it. No mention was publicly made of these other two options so it looks like “determining whether Codex has relationship to nutrition and, if so, what that relationship is” will be undertaken by the CCNFSDU. General Stubblebine and I are waiting with baited breath to find out if nutrition actually does have a relationship to nutrition and, if so, what it is. Or what Dr. Grossklaus will let it be. You couldn’t tell much about the relationship between Codex and nutrition today except to say that they are having a pretty big spat. WHO appeared to have its hackles up as Dr. G. ignored it repeatedly, but Dr. G. was significantly dismissive and argumentative towards that organization.

During his obviously un-cleared-by-Dr.-Grossklaus speech, the government participant noted that CCNFSDU needed to determine what role the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy for Diet, Physical Exercise and Health was going to play in CCNFSDU and what role CCNFSDU would play in its implementation. You will recall that last July the WHO representative severely chastised Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) for not making a significant contribution to human health in its 42 years of existence and then, the next day, demanded that Codex participate in implementing the WHO Global Strategy. Dr. Slorach, the CAC Chairman, ended the discussion of both issues peremptorily and there was no further consideration of the topics at that time. He also asked for a document from WHO stating what it wanted Codex to do to bring about this implementation.

So after a couple of greetings from a couple of folks, we got down to business. The WHO representative (names to follow tomorrow when the list comes out) told the CCNFSDU that she would convene an electronic forum to allow people from CCNFSDU to work with WHO to develop a meaningful way to implement the WHO Global Strategy. This sounded reasonable enough to me but the course of this matter was not smooth. There were objections from several people who did not like the agenda item. Dr. Grossklaus put the discussion off in a number of different ways, some bureaucratic and some procedural. Ultimately, he assigned the whole discussion to Agenda Item #10, the last substantive item of the meeting. This had the advantage of serving as a double edged sword: forcing people to race through the other items on the agenda so that there would be no time for the detailed discussion earlier agenda items required and then, at the last part of the schedule there would be insufficient time for the apparently unwelcome WHO Global Strategy discussion.

Several delegates objected to this ploy, including the UK, Consumers International (a Non Governmental Organization) and India who demanded that the important topic of the WHO global strategy be given adequate time. Dr. G. was having none of it! Item 10 he said and item 10 it stayed.

The WHO representative seemed to ignore Dr. G. and gave a detailed history of the WHO Global Strategy, Codex’s involvement and the mechanism for decision making process by CCNFSDU. Dr. G. rudely cut her off and sent the discussion careening into a direction much more to his liking.

But there was a mini-mutiny on Dr. G.’s hands at that moment, it would seem. A rapid-fire free-for-all broke loose in which people were calling out their pet projects and issues with no particular rhyme or reason that we could see:
Norway demanded that the addition of sugar to baby cereal was dangerous and wanted to discuss it right away. Postpone the discussion, said Dr. G, until later.
IOCFA (an infant formula GMO) stridently ordered the Codex regulations to do nothing to hurt the babies. Dr. G. ignored her completely.

Then IBFAN (another baby feeding NGO) demanded that the WHO Global Strategy on Infant Feeding be implemented, Not a nod from Dr. G.

Consumer International noted that it supported the points made by the previous speakers but that we must discuss advertising and how food is communicated to consumers and so on. And so it went for a while with a lot of topics brought forward and no productive discussion of any of them.

While that was pretty interesting, things heated up quite a bit during the cereal based infant food and gluten-free discussions. Dr. G made statements like, “Our mandate is to determine nutrition claims, not health claims” and “Nutrition labels are not about labeling for health, they are about labeling for trade purposes.”

The big event of the day, far and away, was agenda item
No. 4: Discussion Paper on the Proposals for Additional or Revised Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) for Labeling Purposes. South Africa had produced a report via an Electronic Working Group which addressed the need to reevaluate the Nutrient Reference Values established by the Helsinki Consultation (September, 1988). The report stated that the “label was a source of nutrition information”, “… based on an amount sufficient to promote optimum health” and “the promotion of better health for the world through optimum nutrient intake, would be in line with the WHO/FAO’s request that Codex, specifically the CCNFSDU and CCFL, implement the WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Exercise and Health”.

Poor Dr. G! He just could not get away from the WHO Global Strategy.
The Discussion Paper segregated people into age, gender and condition groups (e.g., infants, children under 4, pregnant women, etc.) listing a group of 32 vitamins and minerals, noting “initially only vitamins and minerals will be dealt with”.

Dr. Grossklaus was NOT amused. He ripped into the delegate from South Africa viciously. Here is part of what he said before sending the South African delegate back to the drawing board to come up with something he liked better while ranting (verbatim quote:)
“Let’s stick to the basic issues: IT IS ABOUT LABELING, NOT NUTRITION.
The Helsinki paper, the purpose of NRVs as established in the Helsinki paper, was about serving nutrient labeling so that consumers world wide should know about a food containing a significant amount of calcium, not about finding a maximum health value of that nutrient.
….This committee should stick to its original terms of reference. Let us first agree on the general terms for establishing the values for nutrient NRVs.
The [WHO] Global Strategy does not form part of this. Maybe that is not fair, but this is about labeling, not about providing them with optimum food. This is about global trade in products offering vitamins and minerals. That is our mandate. That’s it. This is about trade.”

The South African delegate did not have anything to say.

There were other enlightening moments today, as when Dr. G. (in response to the delegate from Tanzania who called for good listening in the spirit of consensus)
condescendingly made it clear that while it was an African tradition to listen to what everyone had to say he was “not going to take the time to listen to what everyone has to say since I am not wearing my African tie today. I promise I will wear it tomorrow!”

Not a fun day. However, the good news is that we spoke with numerous delegates and discussed with them the fact that our Revised Vitamin and Mineral Guideline can be passed by their countries, leaving them Codex Compliant so that they avoid the wallop of World Trade Organization (WTO) trade sanctions and allow them to serve the real nutritional needs of their people, instead of, as Dr. G. so eloquently put it, “[making decisions which are] about labeling, not about providing them with optimum food!

What can you do? Ride the freedom mouse: take a few minutes to send a few letters AND send a join in letter on the Citizen Petition to provide strong leadership for protecting our health freedom and assuming an international leadership role in protecting it around the world to end world hunger and promote world health. Our Citizen Petition with the Revised Vitamin and Mineral Guideline as part of it does all that.

Oh yes, one other thing: please donate generously. Every penny goes for the freedom fight. Join us. Things are just getting interesting.

Come back tomorrow: I’ll let you know what’s cooking.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Laibow
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation